On 06/03/2016 07:54 AM, Stefan Peter wrote:
Dear Andreas Metzler
On 03.06.2016 19:44, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Stefan Peter wrote:
[...]
IIRC, current enblend/enfuse always use OpenMP. The separation in OpenMP
and not OpenMP enabled binaries has been dropped when support
Hello All,
On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 02:39:41 +1000, T. Modes wrote:
Hi all,
today we are releasing a first beta of Hugin 2016.2.
I have built Fedora 23 packages of Hugin-2016-2.0-beta1.
If any Fedora users would like to contribute to the testing of this beta
release,
Here is a new build:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/files/hugin/hugin-2016.2/Hugin-2016.2.0-beta1-r1.dmg/download
Both the celeste model and the translations should work now.
Niklas
Am Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2016 19:09:55 UTC+2 schrieb Claudio Soprano:
>
> I have 2 errors on the mac
Dear Andreas Metzler
On 03.06.2016 19:44, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Stefan Peter wrote:
> [...]
>> IIRC, current enblend/enfuse always use OpenMP. The separation in OpenMP
>> and not OpenMP enabled binaries has been dropped when support for the
>> image cache (which was not
Stefan Peter wrote:
[...]
> IIRC, current enblend/enfuse always use OpenMP. The separation in OpenMP
> and not OpenMP enabled binaries has been dropped when support for the
> image cache (which was not compatible with OpenMP) was dropped in 4.1.
Right, except that this
Trying the mentioned 2016.2 beta 1 release, everything related to my
use (defishing) seems to work, but I'm getting an issue with Hugin and
PTBatcherGUI in the OS X docker.
after the stitching process is finished and I close the PTBatcherGUI window
/ exit Hugin, the PTBatcherGUI icon *always*
Dear David W. Jones
Am 03.06.2016 um 09:50 schrieb Gnome Nomad:
>>
>> If
>> enblend --show-software-components
>> mentions OpenMP, it is enabled I'd say.
>
> Enblend reports "unknown long option".
>
Then you need tu use enblend-mp.
With kind regards
Stefan Peter
--
A list of frequently
On Jun 2, 2016 21:44, "Stefan Peter" wrote:
>
> Dear David W. Jones
> Am 03.06.2016 um 09:23 schrieb David W. Jones:
> > On 06/02/2016 09:03 PM, Stefan Peter wrote:
> >> Dear David W. Jones,
> >>
> >> Am 03.06.2016 um 07:40 schrieb David W. Jones:
> >>>
> >>> Are enblend
Dear David W. Jones
Am 03.06.2016 um 09:23 schrieb David W. Jones:
> On 06/02/2016 09:03 PM, Stefan Peter wrote:
>> Dear David W. Jones,
>>
>> Am 03.06.2016 um 07:40 schrieb David W. Jones:
>>>
>>> Are enblend and enfuse in those packages OpenMP-enabled?
>>
>
>> IIRC, current enblend/enfuse
On 06/02/2016 09:03 PM, Stefan Peter wrote:
Dear David W. Jones,
Am 03.06.2016 um 07:40 schrieb David W. Jones:
Are enblend and enfuse in those packages OpenMP-enabled?
Enblend/Enfuse are not part of the Hugin packages, they have their own
packaging.
Sorry, I knew that.
IIRC, current
Dear David W. Jones,
Am 03.06.2016 um 07:40 schrieb David W. Jones:
>
> Are enblend and enfuse in those packages OpenMP-enabled?
>
Enblend/Enfuse are not part of the Hugin packages, they have their own
packaging.
IIRC, current enblend/enfuse always use OpenMP. The separation in OpenMP
and not
11 matches
Mail list logo