[hugin-ptx] Re: Final version Hugin 2014.0.0 released

Hi Guys, I have just downloaded the 2014 version and I do not know if it is a random success or not, but what was a problem in 2013: http://www.rozenek.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/hugin-2013-1024x479.jpg is NOT a problem in Hugin 2014: http://www.rozenek.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/hugin-

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

Hi Erik, Thank you for your email. There is nothing (IMO) else to say at this stage, lol :) I have already taken a few panoramas with locked AF and we will see the result soon. I took them whis weekend and if all is oK, it means it was a problem with AF. I will share results. Thank you all aga

RE: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

> So changing focus while shooting a panorama is not a good idea. I did not know about it :) However it means there was nothing wrong with my home made bracket on the ball head and also I was right saying it was something strange because the problem used to appear far away from the nodal point

RE: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

rge opening and have little depth of field, autofocus can definitely mess up a panorama! On 07/12/2014 06:57 AM, Pawel Rozenek wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I know what was wrong with my panorama!!! :) > > Autofocus caused the problem. When it slightly changes the distance, > also

RE: [hugin-ptx] Re: Quiet heRe:(

Thank you. -Original Message- From: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com [mailto:hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Erik Krause Sent: 12 July 2014 23:35 To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Quiet heRe:( Am 11.07.2014 20:22, schrieb Pawel Rozenek: > Because people do

RE: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

ive a similar result, given the same amount of care in the assignment of control points etc. John On Saturday, June 14, 2014 10:26:00 AM UTC+1, Pawel Rozenek wrote: Hi Daniel, I really apologise -I missed your email. I uploaded my panorama files together with hugin files here:

[hugin-ptx] Quiet here :(

Because people do not post anything, I'd like to show my latest panorama from the highest mountain in Wales, UK: http://panorama360.photo/snowdon-panorama-360-x-180/ Regards Pawel Rozenek -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ ---

[hugin-ptx] RE: Samyang and Hugin

Hi Guys, I think I found the solution. Firstly in was unnecessary to try set up yaw, pitch etc. Secondly, instead of using normal lens setting, it was better to use circular fisheye. I found 114 control points! :) Correct settings: From: Pawel Rozenek [mailto:sq8

[hugin-ptx] Samyang and Hugin

Hi All, Someone may think that I do not like Hugin because I am complaining and complaining :) But it is not a true at all! I always use 14mm lens on FF camera but a few days ago I took MY FIRST Samyang 8mm fisheye panorama on DX camera. 6 pictures (4 x 90deg + nadir + zenith) and I stit

[hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

small imperfection could cause so big problem on objects which are quite far away - but, I have got proof so I can;t argue with optic rules :) Thank you all again. Pawel Rozenek -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this me

[hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

problem and I try to understand why. Possibly you all have a right - my nodal point was not perfect. I just do not understand why it affected so far parts of the picture :) Thank you Daniel and everybody who tried to help. Pawel Rozenek On Monday, 9 June 2014 00:33:13 UTC+1, dkloi wrote: > &

[hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

forts made to > align the images lower down. If you care to make a set of images available > (half size jpegs would do), maybe we could give a more informed opinion > about what's going on. > > John > > On Saturday, June 7, 2014 9:54:52 AM UTC+1, Pawel Rozenek wrote

[hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

Hi Guys, A few months ago we had a conversation about a stitching problem in my panorama. The print screen from my panorama is here: http://www.rozenek.com/images/forum/hugin-problem.jpg and the panorama is here: http://www.rozenek.com/royal-arcade-norwich-panorama-360-x-180/ Despite having a p

Re: [hugin-ptx] Can I automatically improve stitching?

Thank you Carl and EVERYBODY for your help! I will try do a few panos this weekend On Friday, 21 March 2014 14:23:06 UTC, zarl wrote: > > Pawel Rozenek schrieb am 20.03.14 21:13: > > (...) Unfortunately panorama still > > has some errors. > > Your input images might

Re: [hugin-ptx] Can I automatically improve stitching?

> > to optimize d and e you first have to choose the Expert interface at the > menu Interface / Expert > > Then you go to the Photos tab and at the Geometric combo in the > Optimise section (bottom part of the window) you choose "Custom > parameters". When choosing this a ne

Re: [hugin-ptx] Can I automatically improve stitching?

ing at the lens pupil from front is less precise but can > be an easier first test. And don't forget to do tilt to test, cause at that > link they don't do that and this is probably your possible main problem > with using a ball head. > > Cheers, > > > Carlos E

Re: [hugin-ptx] Can I automatically improve stitching?

Brandan, Thank you for your amazing answer. The ball head is always lock and I do NOT use it at all. To rotate left-right I use a head feature - connection, which is under a ball head. My L bracket in NOT adjustable. Has been designed by me and cut on CNC machine especially to my camera, grip a

Re: [hugin-ptx] Can I automatically improve stitching?

I think I need to apologise everyone who told me that it is a ball head problem. I can't look at my bracket now for two reasons: because I am at work and also because I sent the bracket for powder coating. However I found my 3d model of the bracket and when I looked I realised that if I tilt th

Re: [hugin-ptx] Can I automatically improve stitching?

Hi bugbear and Felix, While I don't know your setup, I was unpleasently suprised a number of > times by the amount of flex added by anything between my tripod and a > pano head (e.g. a ball head). > > I will do a short video showing how my tripod, head and pano bracket works. > As I said

Re: [hugin-ptx] Can I automatically improve stitching?

. Regards Pawel Rozenek On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 23:14:04 UTC, Cartola wrote: > > > 2014-03-19 12:09 GMT-03:00 Carl von Einem >: > >> A ball head between the rotating base and the bracket is the first thing >> I'd change. >> > > I haven't noticed t

[hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

Thank you anyone who decided to say something in my post. The L bracket is made from 10 mm thic aluminium, plate plate is 4mm thick and please believe me that the maximum fluctuation is +/-2 2 mm so in MY opinion with 14mm focal length is nothing (am I wrong?) The head ball... Hm.. It is a bett

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

Hi Carlos, It sounds too complicated like for me :) I am still thinking about changing options in Hugin's preferences tab, however I have no idea how to change it, this is a reason why I am looking for help here - maybe someone had the same problem :) On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 11:16:42 UTC,

[hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

Hi Tduell and thank you for your answer. I have got Windows 8 and I do not feel good enough to compile Hugin from source if this is what you meant (I am not sure). A few weeks ago I tried to install windows version of Hugin 2014 but it kept crashing so I decided to stay with 2013. Actually I w

[hugin-ptx] Can I automatically improve stitching?

Hi Panoramers :) Quite often stitching pictures in Hugin gives e a result like here: http://www.rozenek.com/images/forum/hugin-problem.jpg It is NOT a problem with my bracket, because I designed a special bracket just for my camera: http://www.rozenek.com/a-new-version-of-the-panoramic-bracket-f

Re: [hugin-ptx] Why my Hugin 2013 saving panos in tiff format?

I found what was wrong - I typed -no-ciecam instead of -- (minus minus) On Saturday, 22 February 2014 14:03:04 UTC, Pawel Rozenek wrote: > > I have just checked in logs that Hugin requests this: > "C:/Program Files/Hugin/bin/enblend" --compression=90 –no-ciecam -w > -f3000x

Re: [hugin-ptx] Why my Hugin 2013 saving panos in tiff format?

I have just checked in logs that Hugin requests this: "C:/Program Files/Hugin/bin/enblend" --compression=90 –no-ciecam -w -f3000x1500 -o "panorama2.jpg" -- "panorama2.tif" "panorama20001.tif" "panorama20002.tif" "panorama20003.tif" "panorama20004.tif" "panorama20005.tif" "panorama20006.tif"

[hugin-ptx] Why my Hugin 2013 saving panos in tiff format?

Hi, for some strange reasons my Hugin 2013 is saving panoramas in tiff format instead of jpg. Of course I say to stich pictures in jpg (quality 90) format. Can anyone please have idea what is wrong? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Enfused panorama picture is too bright.

On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 08:55:35 UTC, Frédéric COIFFIER wrote: > > Hmm, you may subscribe to the bug report. > Maybe, one day, a developer will solve it. > Frederic, thank you again so much. I was thinking about downgrading my Hugin to 2012 :) Where can I do this report? -- A lis

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Enfused panorama picture is too bright.

Have you tried the enblend option --no-ciecam ? > https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/1157155 > > > > How can I say thank you? It works!

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Enfused panorama picture is too bright.

ugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/1157155<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs.launchpad.net%2Fenblend%2F%2Bbug%2F1157155&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGVk9W5k5gebCOFUrcTSTYFMeMsmw> > > > Regards, > Frederic > > Le lundi 25 novembre 2013 11:42:32 Pawel Rozenek

Re: [hugin-ptx] Enfused panorama picture is too bright.

tools.org%2FNodal_Point&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHrlDpgxnINGb7bncR4VuphFAlmWQ> > > > I made my bracket myselt just for my camera: http://www.rozenek.com/images/forum/bracket.jpg > Cheers, > Carl > > Pawel Rozenek schrieb am 23.11.13 19:41: > > Hi All, >

[hugin-ptx] Re: Enfused panorama picture is too bright.

Guys, please help... I have tried all options and it still doesn't work :( I am using already HDR component pictures because I prefer to use my favorite HDR software and then I only want to stitch them together. Moreover, while Hugin is generating the panorama, I can view temporary tiff files

[hugin-ptx] Re: Enfused panorama picture is too bright.

> What wrong I have done? > > I forgot to say that I used option panorama outputs: exposure corrected, low dynamic range --> JPG all other options were unchecked I am happy to keep my component pictures with unchanged exposition. Which options should I use? -- A list of frequently asked q

[hugin-ptx] Enfused panorama picture is too bright.

Hi All, I have done about 20...30 360x180 panoramas in my life. I was always using Hugin 2012 version. Last night I tried to use a different lens and I had a problem with stitching all the pictures together (possibly the nodal point was not very well adjusted). Anyway, looking for help in inter