Floating-point numbers often add a small rounding error. Maybe the slightly
negative number isn't a bug but such a thing...
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, 00:55 AKS-Gmail-IMAP, wrote:
> I can comment on some of this. I am currently using the "method 3” to
> create “contact sheet” images of 35mm photograph
I can comment on some of this. I am currently using the "method 3” to create
“contact sheet” images of 35mm photograph film rolls archived in style
“35-7BXW” PrintFile archival negatives preservers. These are clear plastic
negatives preserves holding seven rows of six 35mm image negative strips.
Am Samstag, 23. Februar 2019 09:40:54 UTC+1 schrieb Bruno Postle:
>
>
> >I only get the option to set these things if I select Custom on the
> >geometric optimization pull down. Is that
> >the place to set the vars to participate in optimization?
>
> Yes, I would set 'custom' geometric optim
On 21 February 2019 14:10:41 CET, jim cullen wrote:
>
>I can't seem to make it fix the roll and pitch at zero successfully during
>optimization.
>
>I'm setting the fast preview mode to Mosaic plane - is that proper? I ask
>because the python script
>stitch-scanned-images.py which one can f
Hello,
That all makes some sense.
I can't seem to make it fix the roll and pitch at zero successfully during
optimization.
I'm setting the fast preview mode to Mosaic plane - is that proper? I ask
because the python script
stitch-scanned-images.py which one can find on github constructs a .
On 19 February 2019 22:59:18 GMT, jim cullen wrote:
>
>I use Equirectangular and Mosaic. I crop to max so I can cut it down later
>in gimp. I use center fit and level.
Equirectangular output projection will result in some curved lines. The only
projection that preserves straight lines is re
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2019-02-20 9:55 UTC+01:00, bugbear :
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
I believe horizontal control points should only be used when assembling an
actual landscape panorama, to mark the horizon itself. I never assembled
flatbed or microscope images, but I did some mosaic mode
2019-02-20 9:55 UTC+01:00, bugbear :
> Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>> I believe horizontal control points should only be used when assembling an
>> actual landscape panorama, to mark the horizon itself. I never assembled
>> flatbed or microscope images, but I did some mosaic mode stitches. My
>> rem
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
I believe horizontal control points should only be used when assembling an
actual landscape panorama, to mark the horizon itself. I never assembled
flatbed or microscope images, but I did some mosaic mode stitches. My remark
could be wrong...
I use horizontal and v
Fascinating. I'm guessing that whatever application/system produced the
A1 drawings in the first place - or the data files - aren't available
anymore?
On 2/19/19 12:59 PM, jim cullen wrote:
Hello -
After vast amounts of work I think I have it pretty much working.
Basic Approach:
I take the 2
Hello,
Le mar. 19 févr. 2019 à 23:59, jim cullen a écrit :
>
> The size of the thing came out enormous (the physical size of the eventual
> pdf) so had to scale that back.
>
You can change the size of the final image inside Hugin, of course.
> I still have some places where lines don't match
Hello Jim and all the others,
Wednesday, February 20, 2019, 12:59:18 AM, you wrote:
> After vast amounts of work I think I have it pretty much working.
> Basic Approach:
Your approach aligns (haha!) well with my workflow in stitching photos
of microscopic slides. Although the origin is different
Hello -
After vast amounts of work I think I have it pretty much working.
Basic Approach:
I take the 24 scans comprising an A1 drawing and load them all.
>From the assistant I align them all - it makes a mess due to repeated
features in the drawing.
I enable scans one at a time in the quick
On 15 February 2019 22:40:45 GMT, jim cullen wrote:
>Thanks for your suggestion. After slightly modifying the
>sticth-scan... Python script I have an output.pto I can open in hugin
>and add control points. I assume need remove points on repeated
>features as well, optimize and stich.
Yes, hop
Hello
Thanks for your suggestion. After slightly modifying the sticth-scan... Python
script I have an output.pto I can open in hugin and add control points. I
assume need remove points on repeated features as well, optimize and stich.
Is that basically correct,
and can I delete control points
g...@github.com:mpetroff/stitch-scanned-images.git
has worked for me in similar cases.
Kind regards,
Gunter.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin
Any automated tool like this is going to fail some of the time, especially if
your images have repetitive features.
I'm not familiar with stitch-scanned-images, but I would expect that in
addition to producing a stitched image, it would also provide a PTO project
that you can open in Hugin to f
Hello
I'm trying to stitch 24 scans into a 2x3 foot drawing using
stitch-scanned-images which is a python script on sf gethub.(Running hugin
2018.0.0 macosx)
First row alone works well.
First 2 of second row fine.
Third scan row 2 has a couple of features with very much in common with second
18 matches
Mail list logo
