On Thu 20-Aug-2009 at 19:26 -0700, RueiKe wrote:
>
> These 4 photos are all for the Nadir. Since these are taken off
> the nodal point, I usually manually assign a different lens
> number. Is this not appropriate?
You should be able to do this if there are lots of control points
connecting t
Hi Bruno,
These 4 photos are all for the Nadir. Since these are taken off the
nodal point, I usually manually assign a different lens number. Is
this not appropriate?
Looks like with the initial Alignment after adding all of the control
points, odd fitting parameters were set due to many bad a
On Thu 20-Aug-2009 at 08:05 -0700, RueiKe wrote:
>
>I uploaded the pto file:
>http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/web/KL5_Rev1.pto?hl=en%05eeb80c98d0c9ce2
The problem is only with four photos 80,81,82,83 (this is a big
project). Basically, somehow they got a different lens number with
an
Hi Gerry,
I uploaded the pto file:
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/web/KL5_Rev1.pto?hl=en%05eeb80c98d0c9ce2
Also, I have completed the project by finally reseting all data for
all images and reailigning. Before taking this action, I was deleting
the offending control points, but after
On Aug 20, 2009, at 1:43 AM, RueiKe wrote:
>
> I have found in the past sporadic control points that show very large
> errors, but when reviewed look normal. I have included a screen
> capture http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/web/
> Hugin_Error_20aug09.jpg?hl=en%05eeb80c98d0c9ce2">h
