2012/1/20 Erik Krause erik.kra...@gmx.de
Me too. This doesn't need to be an expensive one. The Samyang 8mm (also
sold under different brands) will do:
http://michel.thoby.free.fr/**SAMYANG/Early%20test%20report.**htmlhttp://michel.thoby.free.fr/SAMYANG/Early%20test%20report.html
Thanks for
On 21 Jan., 09:09, Thomas Pryds tho...@pryds.eu wrote:
2012/1/20 Erik Krause erik.kra...@gmx.de
Me too. This doesn't need to be an expensive one. The Samyang 8mm (also
sold under different brands) will do:
...
see also
Am 21.01.2012 09:09, schrieb Thomas Pryds:
I think I'm for a circular one, though. Although I don't have much to
base this preference on ;-)
With a (true) circular one you simply waste half of your sensor pixels.
If you shoot sphericals you get a much lower resolution. For a table see
Am 19.01.2012 22:39, schrieb panostar:
I would recommend a true fisheye lens.
Me too. This doesn't need to be an expensive one. The Samyang 8mm (also
sold under different brands) will do:
http://michel.thoby.free.fr/SAMYANG/Early%20test%20report.html
If you want full frame (on full frame
On Jan 19, 6:32 pm, Thomas Pryds tho...@pryds.eu wrote:
Does anyone here know of somewhere to obtain a (free) set of fisheye images
in a reasonable resolution for stitching into a panorama?
Try the image sets at http://tinyurl.com/2f9sgh
On a side note: What would you recommend? A true
