paul womack wrote:
>
> An inexpensive alternative to a Panosaurus is a
> home made head:
There are a couple home made ones on
http://wiki.panotools.org/Heads#Self_made
if you know more please add...
--
Erik Krause
http://www.erik-krause.de
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~---
Nice work. I'll take two.
-Original Message-
From: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com [mailto:hugin-...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of paul womack
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 6:02 AM
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Parrallax (?)
Don Holeman wrote:
>
>&g
Don Holeman wrote:
>
>>> Is there a way to adjust for parallax(?).
>
> An inexpensive alternative to a fancy pano head is the Panosaurus. I have
> one and it works amazingly well.
An inexpensive alternative to a Panosaurus is a
home made head:
http://www.panotools.org/mailarchive/msg/65392#ms
>> Is there a way to adjust for parallax(?).
An inexpensive alternative to a fancy pano head is the Panosaurus. I have
one and it works amazingly well.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and o
Dale Beams wrote:
> Is there a way to adjust for parallax(?). Assuming that a series is
> taken on a photograph, and that the rotation around a tripod is
> constant, then a cylindrical area could be determined and photos
> adjusted accordingly?
You can't correct for parallax errors after shooti
Hi,
I'm not sure if I understand what you mean exactly. I assume you're
taking multiple photographs from a tripod (without a panoramic head)
which you want to compile into a panorama, and you're asking if
parallax is a problem which can be automagically solved? I this case
the answer is no, unfo
