Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Scripted stitching of webcam pictures - advice appreciated

2014-06-06 Thread Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)
2014-06-06 6:46 GMT-03:00 Jacob Hämmerle : > 2. Another thing. In the controlpoint editor it shows how good the > images/cp match. When adding manual ones the bar goes much more smaller and > red ... thats lil strange to me. > I think the bar is only meaningful after optimizing. It will be red if

[hugin-ptx] Re: Scripted stitching of webcam pictures - advice appreciated

2014-06-06 Thread Monkey
1. Just a guess. 2. I don't what the bar means - perhaps it is to do with the supposed quality of the control points, since any manual ones are likely to be in areas that don't look very visually similar (since the auto control point function would have already put good control points in the ar

[hugin-ptx] Re: Scripted stitching of webcam pictures - advice appreciated

2014-06-05 Thread Monkey
Actually, having said all that, I now find that when dragging the images around in the GL viewer, they don't stay fixed together as I was expecting them to, so maybe I'm entirely wrong to suggest doing it that way! -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.

[hugin-ptx] Re: Scripted stitching of webcam pictures - advice appreciated

2014-06-05 Thread Monkey
"4. Last and least: How would you do it? What is your advice to me?" I got a pretty good result by doing the following: Load the images into Hugin, and set an approximate HFOV (I used 45 degrees) and a projection of equirectangular Create some control points - I used "Create control points" on