I forgive you! Thanks, I kicked it up to 100% where it belongs IMHO.
On 03/26/2013 12:18 PM, Donald Johnston wrote:
70% because it was version 0.7! ;o) Sorry … it had to be said.
On 2013-03-26, at 11:03 AM, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote:
Hmmm. Here, the Simple interface's optimal size
Great explanation! :-)
And it's so much easier to understand than e.g.
http://wiki.panotools.org/Diffraction#Resolution
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Preferences#Auto_align
This reminded me of something similarly elegant, the compression haiku
by Bradford Bohonus, posted a long time ago on
On 03/25/2013 06:40 AM, T. Modes wrote:
On 25 Mrz., 04:34, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On the screen you see after pressing the Create Panorama button, there
are two spin boxes for setting size. Could we have an Optimal Size
button, please? Thanks.
When this dialog is shown, the
Hmmm. Here, the Simple interface's optimal size (1553x284, as indicated
by the spinners) is noticeably smaller than the optimal size (2266x727,
as calculated by the button on the Stitch tab of the Advanced
interface).
That's the downscale factor: 70 % as default. As already written.
I
Gnome Nomad schrieb am 26.03.13 11:13:
On 03/25/2013 06:40 AM, T. Modes wrote:
On 25 Mrz., 04:34, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On the screen you see after pressing the Create Panorama button, there
are two spin boxes for setting size. Could we have an Optimal Size
button, please?
70% because it was version 0.7! ;o) Sorry … it had to be said.
On 2013-03-26, at 11:03 AM, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote:
Hmmm. Here, the Simple interface's optimal size (1553x284, as indicated
by the spinners) is noticeably smaller than the optimal size (2266x727,
as calculated by the
On 25 Mrz., 04:34, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On the screen you see after pressing the Create Panorama button, there
are two spin boxes for setting size. Could we have an Optimal Size
button, please? Thanks.
When this dialog is shown, the output size is already set to the
