Sorry, this was in reply to a pano not being stitched properly because of
WRONG (not missing) exif data.
On Monday, January 24, 2011 7:12:59 PM UTC+1, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
>
> I've seen this before also, on a canon 24-70mm lens, the 70mm images were
> recorded as 24mm in exif.
>
> But yes, if e
I've seen this before also, on a canon 24-70mm lens, the 70mm images were
recorded as 24mm in exif.
But yes, if exif is there, but wrong, that's really too bad. However, if the
stitch is unsuccessful (e.g. no control points at all) then Hugin should
probably tell the user, "No control points fo
Hi Yuv,
Am 23.01.2011 15:10, schrieb Yuval Levy:
Michel's test/challenge was for this to work "out of the box" and I did not
have time to investigate further. I realize now when running Exiftool that it
reports 0mm focal distance; and that Hugin sets the focal length to 50mm by
default, even i
Hi Pablo,
On January 23, 2011 02:45:55 am Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
> > http://www.sendspace.com/file/vnek81
>
> I tried the set with the following steps:
Thanks.
> With assistant:
> 1. load images, set 14 mm rectilinear
> 2. align
> 3. straighten by drag in preview
>
> http://www.flickr.com/ph
Hi Yuv,
Am 23.01.2011 04:33, schrieb Yuval Levy:
> can somebody please check why Hugin/cpfind has difficulties with this
set of
> images from Michel Thoby?
>
> http://www.sendspace.com/file/vnek81
I tried the set with the following steps:
With assistant:
1. load images, set 14 mm rectilinear
