Re: [hugin-ptx] Map Difficulties 2

2014-04-30 Thread Monkey
Quick and dirty multiblend attempt with a handmade mask: http://i62.tinypic.com/24b29vb.jpg -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panorami

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map Difficulties 2

2014-04-30 Thread Monkey
On Monday, 28 April 2014 11:02:10 UTC+1, Bruno Postle wrote: > > On 28 April 2014 10:24, paul womack wrote: > > > On this particular map, some of the tiles have borders, > > which I am attempting to remove using Hugin's > > crop/mask features. > > Yes, masking in Hugin isn't very useful where

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map Difficulties 2

2014-04-28 Thread T. Modes
Am Montag, 28. April 2014 12:23:49 UTC+2 schrieb bugbear: > > Yes - the mask faults remain, but doing: > > The cause for this are overlapping include masks. If this is fixed the output is ok. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- Y

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map Difficulties 2

2014-04-28 Thread paul womack
Bruno Postle wrote: On 28 April 2014 10:24, paul womack wrote: On this particular map, some of the tiles have borders, which I am attempting to remove using Hugin's crop/mask features. Yes, masking in Hugin isn't very useful where there are tiny overlaps. Enblend also probably isn't appropria

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map Difficulties 2

2014-04-28 Thread Bruno Postle
On 28 April 2014 10:24, paul womack wrote: > On this particular map, some of the tiles have borders, > which I am attempting to remove using Hugin's > crop/mask features. Yes, masking in Hugin isn't very useful where there are tiny overlaps. Enblend also probably isn't appropriate for this sort o

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map Difficulties 2

2014-04-28 Thread paul womack
paul womack wrote: On this particular map, some of the tiles have borders, which I am attempting to remove using Hugin's crop/mask features. This is not working "as well as I would like". Final GUI whinge. The shortcuts for the various scaled views that apply to the control points dialogue don

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map difficulties

2014-02-12 Thread Terry Duell
Hello Paul, On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:42:28 +1100, paul womack wrote: Can you rack your memory, or go from the start again keeping notes? OK, attached london-4.pto, mean error 3.0, max 40.1. The process I went through is as follows, in Expert interface, Optimiser tab; 1. 'unselect all

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map difficulties

2014-02-12 Thread Terry Duell
Hello Paul, On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:42:28 +1100, paul womack wrote: [snip] 1) How did you do it?! I didn't make any notes, but my recollection is that I reset yaw and pitch of all images, then set v,r,X,Y,Z to be optimised for all except the position anchor. I just tried that (quite

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map difficulties

2014-02-12 Thread paul womack
Terry Duell wrote: Hello Paul, On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:03:06 +1100, paul womack wrote: [snip] That works nicely (I rotated it so that North is up), by altering the R of the anchor a little at a time, re-optmising after each change. So - follow-up questions 1) How did you do it?! I didn't m

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map difficulties

2014-02-10 Thread Terry Duell
Hello Paul, On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:03:06 +1100, paul womack wrote: [snip] That works nicely (I rotated it so that North is up), by altering the R of the anchor a little at a time, re-optmising after each change. So - follow-up questions 1) How did you do it?! I didn't make any notes, bu

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map difficulties

2014-02-10 Thread paul womack
Terry Duell wrote: OK, I've tried that; the optimiser essentially failed. Came up with very small HFOV (0.9 !!) and set all the X and Y to zero, and had a range or Z's from -1.2 to 0. (what is the unit of X Y Z). I had a look at this project, and managed to get it to optimise, but not really

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map difficulties

2014-02-07 Thread paul womack
paul womack wrote: Terry Duell wrote: Give each a new lens and optimise r,X,Y,Z. OK, I've tried that; the optimiser essentially failed. Came up with very small HFOV (0.9 !!) OK - rule for hugin. Never try to optimise ALL the FOV's, always leave one (perhaps the one on the anchor...) set!

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map difficulties

2014-02-07 Thread paul womack
Terry Duell wrote: Give each a new lens and optimise r,X,Y,Z. OK, I've tried that; the optimiser essentially failed. Came up with very small HFOV (0.9 !!) and set all the X and Y to zero, and had a range or Z's from -1.2 to 0. (what is the unit of X Y Z). So - no dice. Since the problem is

Re: [hugin-ptx] Map difficulties

2014-02-06 Thread Terry Duell
Hello Paul, On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 20:10:25 +1100, paul womack wrote: [snip] Questions: * Do I still need a separate lens for each map do handle the scaling, or will Z motion deal with that (is there a write up of X,Y,Z model? the values seem quite odd). * since some of the maps are rotated