On Feb 8, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
>> 1. You reverted an actual grammar fix: "support" -> "supported".
>
> Oops, I missed that part, sorry.
Cool -- you just put that back; thanks.
> No, but as of now there is just no way that binding can be supported
> without knowing anythi
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), on Wed 08 Feb 2017 15:19:58 +, wrote:
> 1. You reverted an actual grammar fix: "support" -> "supported".
Oops, I missed that part, sorry.
> 2. I don't think that "likely" is bad to have. Like I said above, the test
> itself is just a switch/case test based on a hard
The email script doesn't run on GitHub.
We have a GitHub web hook that fires out to the Open MPI hostgator instance
(our web hosting provider). That fires up a PHP script (i.e., GitHub calls
https://...open-mpi.org/...php) and funnels it the information about the
commits that were just pushed t
FWIW, I didn't get the commit email either, and I am pretty sure it's
not the first time it happens. There are no archives for this ML, do we
have a way to see the logs of the emailing script that runs on github ?
Brice
Le 08/02/2017 16:19, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> On Feb 7, 2017, at
On Feb 7, 2017, at 12:12 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>
> Fair enough, but the test itself is just a switch/case statement -- it's not
> an actual test to see if the system supports binding or not. Hence, hedging
> the warning message a little seemed reasonable.
I see you actually rever
On Feb 7, 2017, at 11:48 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
>> -AC_MSG_WARN([*** and binding will not be support.])
>> +AC_MSG_WARN([*** and binding will likely not be supported.])
>
> Well, it's not really "likely": unsupported systems really won't have
> binding support. For getting
git...@open-mpi.org, on Tue 07 Feb 2017 09:15:01 -0600, wrote:
> commit 96a1a1b4d9f4d34e6b26ed4a665a739fd449131a
> Author: Jeff Squyres
> Date: Tue Feb 7 10:13:27 2017 -0500
>
> hwloc.m4: minor english fixes
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Squyres
>
> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ EOF])
>
