> On Mar 18, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> I am planning to fix this in 2.1 (to be released before summer). I'll
> backport the trivial pieces to 2.0.x too.
>
> Do you care about a specific value passed to -Wstack-usage=X? or do you
> just want to avoid dynamic/unbounded allocs on
Hello Pavan
I am planning to fix this in 2.1 (to be released before summer). I'll
backport the trivial pieces to 2.0.x too.
Do you care about a specific value passed to -Wstack-usage=X? or do you
just want to avoid dynamic/unbounded allocs on the stack?
Brice
Le 18/03/2019 à 15:04, Balaji,
Brice, all,
Any update on this? Are you guys planning on fixing these?
-- Pavan
> On Feb 25, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Balaji, Pavan via hwloc-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi Brice,
>
>> On Feb 25, 2019, at 2:27 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> Are you sure you're not passing -Wstack-usage? My Ubuntu 18.04
Hi Brice,
> On Feb 25, 2019, at 2:27 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Are you sure you're not passing -Wstack-usage? My Ubuntu 18.04 with
> latest gcc-7 (7.3.0-27ubuntu1~18.04) doesn't show any of those warnings.
Yes, you are right, -Wstack-usage was explicitly added too. Sorry, I missed
the fact
Hello Pavan,
Are you sure you're not passing -Wstack-usage? My Ubuntu 18.04 with
latest gcc-7 (7.3.0-27ubuntu1~18.04) doesn't show any of those warnings.
It looks like all these warnings are caused by C99 variable-length
arrays (except 2 that I don't understand). I know the kernel devs
stopped
Folks,
I'm getting the below build warnings with hwloc-2.0.3, gcc-7.3 on Ubuntu (with
-Wall -O2):
8<
../../../../../../../../../mpich/src/pm/hydra/tools/topo/hwloc/hwloc/hwloc/distances.c:
In function 'hwloc__groups_by_distances':
