Hi,
Thank you for checking my patch.
At 11 Feb 2002 17:54:58 +,
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, there's a bug: -encoding should set up
> inputState in addition to outputState (keyboard input).
I think it is OK because mergeIso2022() is called after parseOptions()
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Markus Kuhn wrote:
> Yes, ECMA-48/ISO 6429 describes a complete bidi semantics for VT100
> terminals, including ESC sequences to switch between different levels of
> bidi support. It's not widely implemented, but it is formally
> standardized.
The only problem is no bidi exp
Pablo Saratxaga wrote on 2002-02-10 03:52 UTC:
> Now the question is, are there any defined escape sequence to
> activate/unactivate bidi support or not ?
Yes, ECMA-48/ISO 6429 describes a complete bidi semantics for VT100
terminals, including ESC sequences to switch between different levels of
b
