LOTTERY LA PRIMITIVA.
C/GUZMAN EL BUENO,137 MADRID - ESPANA.
TEL:0034 696 026 500
FROM: THE DESK OF THE PROMOTIONS MANAGER,
INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS/PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT,
REF: LP/26510460037/03 BATCH: 24/00319/IPD
RE: AWARD NOTIFICATION
Hey,
Feel like your debts putting you in a hole you can't crawl out of?
We blast your debt and give you a fresh start!
- Save you a lot of money by eliminating late fees
- Settle your accounts for a substantially reduced amount
- Stop creditors calling you on the phone
- Avoid bankruptcy
... and
From: Mrs. Fatima Iyesa Ismiana
My dearest in Christ,
May God be praised!!!
I am Mrs. Fatima Iyesa Ismiana, from Kuwait. I am married to Usman Ismiana of blessed
memory who worked with Kuwait embassy in Madrid Spain for nine years before he died in
the year 2000. We were married for eleven y
четвртак, 14. август 2003. 22:49:34 CEST — Frank Murphy написа:
The problem is that as "the originator of the French language" France
has nothing to do with the keymaps that, say, Canada has chosen.
Of course -- that's why there would be no direct relation between "FR"
file which is the one that
четвртак, 14. август 2003. 14:36:47 CEST — Ivan Pascal написа:
I think it's more likely that one Canadian guy will make and maintain
all possible languages for a Canadian keyboard than one Frenchman
will make all variants of French keymap for all countries.
Yes, you're quite right.
If I'm right
> No, I didn't mean to imply that "FR" was choosen as a default for "fr"
> because of "textual similarity", but rather, because France, with ISO
> 3166 code of "FR", is the "originator" of French language "fr" (perhaps
> this is not a good enough reasoning, and your reasoning based on
> population
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Danilo Segan wrote:
> "fr" would imply using "fr(FR)". All the other cases must be
By which logic, "en" implies "en(EN)", but EN isn't a whole ISO country,
so do we use "en(GB)" as the ISO unit associated with "England",
or "en(US)" as the counrty with the most English speak
> > Sorry, I meant shift levels. my proposed us-ascii would have just
> >
> > key { [ 1,exclam ] };
> >
> > not
> >
> > key { [ 1, exclam, onesuperior, exclamdown ] };
>
> I'd go for:
>
> key { [ 1, exclam, any, any ] };
>
> (I'm not sure if y
четвртак, 14. август 2003. 17:35:10 CEST — Frank Murphy написа:
>
> I'd go for:
>
> key { [ 1, exclam, any, any ] };
>
> (I'm not sure if your idea would work like this -- if it would,
> then this is unneccessary burden).
It's already done with only two levels in the pc/us keymap.
четвртак, 14. август 2003. 16:01:29 — Dr Andrew C Aitchison написа:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Danilo Segan wrote:
> "fr" would imply using "fr(FR)". All the other cases must be
By which logic, "en" implies "en(EN)", but EN isn't a whole ISO
country, so do we use "en(GB)" as the ISO unit associated wit
Read this!
Dont you hate paying off your loans? ... .
We can help! We can consolidate your bills into just one low monthly payment. Start
Fresh!
- Save you a lot of money by eliminating late fees
- Settle your accounts for a substantially reduced amount
- Stop creditors calling you on the phone
> The only xkb_symbols "us" that I see are in digital/us and
> > xfree68/ataritt.
> > But the map would be the same as the xkb_symbols "basic" in pc/us,
> > basically, the same as latin(basic) only not including the group 2 or
> > 3 symbols (exclamdown, etc.). However, it would be in the latin fil
среда, 13. август 2003. 18:58:40 CEST — Frank Murphy написа:
The only xkb_symbols "us" that I see are in digital/us and
xfree68/ataritt.
But the map would be the same as the xkb_symbols "basic" in pc/us,
basically, the same as latin(basic) only not including the group 2 or
3 symbols (exclamdown, e
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Danilo Segan wrote:
> For the sake of difference, I would recommend the following:
> - National keymaps should use ISO 3166 code in all UPPERCASE (eg. "US")
> - Linguistic keymaps should use ISO 639 code in all lowercase (eg. "en")
Is this going to cause us to run into CVS pr
четвртак, 14. август 2003. 13:12:05 — Dr Andrew C Aitchison написа:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Danilo Segan wrote:
> For the sake of difference, I would recommend the following:
> - National keymaps should use ISO 3166 code in all UPPERCASE (eg.
> "US")
> - Linguistic keymaps should use ISO 639 code i
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>
> Is there a difference between CA(fr) and fr(CA)*
> Does the user care about it ? Should we make them mean the same thing ?
> *FR(ca) would be different, although possibly unimportant or meaningless.
I think there is a minor difference.
In such name the first word u
I'd sent these ideas to Ivan Pascal, and he recommended that I bring the
discussion here. I've included his replies to my original mail. The basics
are some ideas for changing some of the files in the symbols directory so
that there's more re-use and, hopefully, people understand them better and
четвртак, 14. август 2003. 04:32:57 CEST — Frank Murphy написа:
>
> Sorry, I meant shift levels. my proposed us-ascii would have just
>
> key { [ 1,exclam ] };
>
> not
>
> key { [ 1, exclam, onesuperior, exclamdown ] };
>
I'd go for:
key { [ 1
Read this!
How are you? Paying off a loan like the rest of america?
We blast your debt and give you a fresh start!
- Save you a lot of money by eliminating late fees
- Settle your accounts for a substantially reduced amount
- Stop creditors calling you on the phone
- Avoid bankruptcy
... and mor
19 matches
Mail list logo
