Hi Roman,
In the IETF-113 meeting, I2NSF WG will have a regular meeting and will
review the Consumer-Facing Interface and Registration Interface Drafts
in terms of the updates by the impact from the IESG reviews for the other
three YANG drafts.
The main contents were reviewed in the past, so the up
On 21/03/2022 16:41, Roman Danyliw wrote:
Hi!
(Aside: There is some confusing threading because this message is on the public
i2nsf@ mailing list, but it originated from a private offlist discussion where
additional discussion is occurring).
I would benefit from some background on how Zahed’s
Hi!
(Aside: There is some confusing threading because this message is on the public
i2nsf@ mailing list, but it originated from a private offlist discussion where
additional discussion is occurring).
I would benefit from some background on how Zahed’s
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ie
Roman:
Agreed! Just warning you that class b (refactoring) will get less
response than item a.
I will try to re-examine Paul's excellent emails to give you type (a)
general model input that need uplift to WG for review. It will be early
Tuesday for this response.
Thanks for your help!
Hi Sue!
> -Original Message-
> From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Susan Hares
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 8:46 AM
> To: 't petch' ; Roman Danyliw ; 'Linda
> Dunbar' ; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Cc: 'Patrick Lingga' ; 'Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong'
>
> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-fac
Hi Roman,
I have submitted the revision of NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model
Draft, addressing all the comments from the IESG and directorates:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-22
The revision of Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model Draft is almost
Hi Wei Pan,
Thanks for your comments and suggestions on the I2NSF Re-chartering.
I will try to address your comments on our re-chartering text.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Paul
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 7:53 PM Panwei (William)
wrote:
> Hi Paul, all,
>
>
>
> Sorry for the late response.
>
>
>
> I fe
Thanks for addressing my comments..the proposed resolutions for my comments
looks good to me.
//Zahed
> On 21 Mar 2022, at 13:36, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexey, Jean-Michel, Erik, Martin, Éric, Francesca, Robert, Murray, and
> Zaheduzzaman,
> Here is the revised draft of I2NS
Tom:
The WG consensus runs into the problems that there are 3 types of changes to
the drafts:
a) content additions/changes to model
b) changes for refactoring of the yang models
c) textual changes that do not impact the model.
As mentioned in my response to Roman that it seems
a) Conte
On 20/03/2022 16:45, Roman Danyliw wrote:
Hi!
Linda: Thanks sending out this assessment and ending the WGLC.
WG: In additional to the IPR check, one other thing I will be looking for in
the second WGLC of this document is (a) evidence of review by the WG and (b)
support by the WG to publish i
Roman:
This is an example of the hurdles placed in front of any Yang model.
During the original creation gathering of information for the yang model, quic
was not even a protocol.
Cheers,
Sue
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong [mailto:jaehoon.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, Marc
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Interface to Network Security Functions WG of
the IETF.
Title : I2NSF Network Security Function-Facing Interface YANG
Data Model
Authors : Jinyong
12 matches
Mail list logo
