3. Should testing and QA be merged? If so, under what name?
My preference would be for TestingTeam (merged).
Marco
Yes I prefer TestingTeam as well. The sidebar says TranslationTeam, in the
name of consistency this should be Translation I think.
QATeam is now Testing Team.
As always,
I think the fact no source code is available might cause a problem for
it getting into Main... thats not necessarily such a bad thing though.
Edubuntu addon packages will definitely go to universe, its just a
question of when. The only difference is, no direct downstream
support. But as I
I'm working on the t-shirts, should have something early next week.
Where are we printing them? Any thoughts?
Christian
_
From: Marco Pesenti Gritti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Walter Bender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bernie Innocenti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Christian Schmidt
-- Forwarded message --
From: Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: [IAEP] Logo (Re: Sugar bug tracker now available)
To: Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes. Plus I need to push the rest of Christian's suggested changes,
including
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:08 AM, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Is there a corporate identity for Sugar... ie a document that
describes how logos should be placed, color scheme, fonts, web layout,
etc?
David Van Assche
Walter and I have a phone call planned with Software Freedom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:54:38PM +1100, Costello, Rob R wrote:
From outside this all looks as though it might suffer from being a
little too pedantic in adhering to definitional terms
It feels as free and open as can be, in terms of what you can
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:54:38PM +1100, Costello, Rob R wrote:
From outside this all looks as though it might suffer from being a
little too pedantic in adhering to definitional terms
It feels as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 06:50:52PM +1800, David Farning wrote:
Yesterday we had a long thread about Sugar on Ubuntu which was helpful
yet filled with misunderstandings.
If you insist on focusing solely on Ubuntu, then please do not bother
cc'ing
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 05:24, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've just asked Ivan to setup a bug tracker for us on solarsail.
This is intended for filing Sugar bugs unrelated to any particular
platform, and for code reviews.
At the moment, the system has no registered
So I am just about finished converting TA to SVG. I am doing this both
to make it easier to localize and to make it easier to scale to
different size screens. What I don't yet have a handle on is the best
way to deal with the translation of the strings in the SVG files. The
problem is one of
David Van Assche wrote on Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:39:00 +0100
I've just been corrected on this by a ubuntu dev, who states for it to
get into universe, it must have source code available. That means that
for now, squeak must stay in Multiverse the only option seems to
seperate squeak from
Hi,
additionaly to what Bert said:
to summarize _my understanding_ again: there is source, there is just no ascii
representation of the source / you cannot compile the source to binaries.
Because the source comes as blobs (being the VM in it's state), which can be
edited inside the virtual
Hi,
On Friday 07 November 2008 14:39, David Van Assche wrote:
the only option seems to
seperate squeak from sugar, if sugar is to get into main or universe.
thats not an option, but it's the (fine) status quo. there are these things
called packages...
regards,
Holger, who also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:30:57PM -0300, Jecel Assumpcao Jr wrote:
David Van Assche wrote on Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:39:00 +0100
I've just been corrected on this by a ubuntu dev, who states for it
to get into universe, it must have source code
I've just been corrected on this by a ubuntu dev, who states for it to
get into universe, it must have source code available. That means that
for now, squeak must stay in Multiverse the only option seems to
seperate squeak from sugar, if sugar is to get into main or universe.
David Van Assche
Should we use the one line version of the logo on dev.sugarlabs.org?
Marco
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 07:07:13PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2008 14:39, David Van Assche wrote:
the only option seems to seperate squeak from sugar, if sugar is to
get into main or universe.
thats not an option, but it's
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/WikiTeam
Who's the owner... cjl? The TODO list looks good... names attached?
No, not the owener, just a contributor. By volume of work, I'd say
dfarning
Hi,
thanks from me to Jecel for clarifications too!
On Friday 07 November 2008 19:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
The Squeak image Etoys (the only one currently packaged officially for
Debian) is in non-free due to ftpmasters judging it not possible for
the security team to maintain throughout
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
thanks from me to Jecel for clarifications too!
On Friday 07 November 2008 19:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
The Squeak image Etoys (the only one currently packaged officially for
Debian) is in non-free due to
Actually, this discussion is getting closer to what's actually the case.
When you get anything made in Squeak (such as Etoys) you are getting all of
Squeak, including a portable machine that contains a full set of sources and
the development tools to make anything, including new versions of
Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
Please note that the reason for eToys being kept out of debian main
is *not* that it is considered non-free.
Debian maintains more than 20.000 packages, and eToys as so far been
judged too odd for Debian to maintain, eg. for patching in case of
security issues.
Holger Levsen wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2008 19:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
The Squeak image Etoys (the only one currently packaged officially for
Debian) is in non-free due to ftpmasters judging it not possible for
the security team to maintain throughout the (multiple year long)
Sure, I completely agree. And now is a chance to apply the idea that via the
Internet the whole world is the pool of resources for making and taking care
of open and free software.
Seems as though no simple group can handle the scaling implied by having the
whole world supply software, even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 05:06:48PM -0500, Gavin Romig-Koch wrote:
Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
Please note that the reason for eToys being kept out of debian
main is *not* that it is considered non-free.
Debian maintains more than 20.000 packages,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:56:44PM -0800, Alan Kay wrote:
Sure, I completely agree. And now is a chance to apply the idea that
via the Internet the whole world is the pool of resources for making
and taking care of open and free software.
In a
At Sat, 8 Nov 2008 01:32:49 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Part of the honest worry about these issues comes from very good
reasons not to just trust everyone. But it also seems that e.g. Debian
needs to widen its circle of trust to include experts in wider
varieties of programming. There
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
You are perfectly right. Subject changed.
Thanks!
[a couple of good and clearly summarized observations snipped]
I'll try to keep this short too...
[it is good to have such debates]
Indeed, but not everybody likes it. The Squeak community itself pulls in
opposite
At Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:09:34 -0300 ,
Jecel Assumpcao Jr wrote:
My point was: is forbidding the export clause as part of the Open Source
definition a practical concern or is it just a philosophical checkbox? I
agree that it would not make sense to have one rule for Squeak and
another for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:12:13PM -0800, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
At Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:45:00 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
The Squeak image Etoys (the only one currently packaged officially
for Debian) is in non-free due to ftpmasters judging it
If teachers and children don't care, then the reason is simply that they
got someone else to do that boring (and perhaps complex) task for them.
It still needs doing. I suspect the same applies to you (Edubuntu is a
distribution too!).
What I meant is that this crowd normally doesn't get
At Sat, 8 Nov 2008 04:26:55 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:12:13PM -0800, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
At Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:45:00 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
The Squeak image Etoys (the only one currently packaged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:09:34AM -0300, Jecel Assumpcao Jr wrote:
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[a couple of good and clearly summarized observations snipped]
I'll try to keep this short too...
Uh, I did not consider short. I shall do my best too :-)
Some people might find this relevant to our work.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rakesh Biswas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:19 PM
Subject: Handbook of Research on Electronic Collaboration and
Organizational Synergy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Forwarding this
At Sat, 8 Nov 2008 05:56:39 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
(In regards to whether it is just a philosophical checkbox, I tend to
think so. If a company makes a product based on an open-source project
and sells it to Cuba from the US, the company may be punished
regardless what its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 08:37:13PM -0800, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
At Sat, 8 Nov 2008 04:26:55 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:12:13PM -0800, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
At Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:45:00 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 09:12:34PM -0800, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
At Sat, 8 Nov 2008 05:56:39 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
(In regards to whether it is just a philosophical checkbox, I tend
to think so. If a company makes a product based on
37 matches
Mail list logo
