On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 04:17, Bastien wrote:
>
> > Cause its close. Really what I
> > think I'm asking for is a "comment" and "vote" functionality on
> Blueprints.
>
> I will forward this request to him and let you know.
I asked around on IRC, and came across this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.
Hi Caroline,
I would also favor LaunchPad over getsatisfaction.com.
Caroline Meeks writes:
> Is LaunchPad open to making changes for us?
Maybe. I will forward this to someone working on LaunchPad.
> Cause its close. Really what I
> think I'm asking for is a "comment" and "vote" functionali
Translated from the olpc-sur list. Please respond in Spanish if possible:
Hi Everyone...What is the latest version of soas to download?? because there
are various pages with different links for strawberry, for soas2xxx
many thankscheers..
Original message
> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 17:54, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:42:57AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>> > [Michael and Tomeu talk]
>>
>> An effective way to become a respected member of on open source
>> community is to start with small ideas and implement them. If the
>> delivera
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 17:18, Michael Stone wrote:
> Tomeu,
>
>
>
>>
>> Frankly Michael, the only way I can read these posts from you is that
>> you are frustrated because we aren't churning more work, regardless of
>> how much we have achieved that is relevant to OLPC deployments.
>
> Correct.
>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 26.08.2009, at 17:42, David Farning wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
>>>
>>> Tomeu,
Frankly Michael, the only way I can read these posts from you is that
you are frustrated because we are
On 26.08.2009, at 17:42, David Farning wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Michael Stone
> wrote:
>> Tomeu,
>>> Frankly Michael, the only way I can read these posts from you is
>>> that
>>> you are frustrated because we aren't churning more work,
>>> regardless of
>>> how much we have
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:42:57AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
> > [Michael and Tomeu talk]
>
> An effective way to become a respected member of on open source
> community is to start with small ideas and implement them. If the
> deliverable works, is useful, and meets coding standards it will be
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:18:13AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> Tomeu> > Do you have any actionable ideas about how to work better for our
> users?
>
> I perceive a double bind: I have lots of ideas, but ideas are cheap and seem
> most unwelcome here -- they're just "talk" instead of "do", aren'
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:22, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 25 Aug 2009, at 16:49, Gary C Martin wrote:
>
>> On 25 Aug 2009, at 16:03, Michael Stone wrote:
>>
El Mon, 24-08-2009 a las 20:58 +0200, Martin Langhoff escribi=F3:
>
> And also... and completely from the outside... I'll apologis
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
> Tomeu,
>> Frankly Michael, the only way I can read these posts from you is that
>> you are frustrated because we aren't churning more work, regardless of
>> how much we have achieved that is relevant to OLPC deployments.
>
> Correct.
>
> I do
Tomeu,
> Frankly Michael, the only way I
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Luke Faraone wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:18, Caroline Meeks
> wrote:
>>
>> Personally I'd like to choose
>> Launch Pad. Its open source where Get Satisfaction is only free to us.
>>
>> However here is today's problem with LaunchPad
>>
>> I want to discuss
As we look at this, we need to think about it from two separate, yet
equally important perspective:
1. How feedback moves from the user to the channel (and back to the user)
2. How feedback moves from the channel to the developer.
It looks like you and Luke are the champions for this issues. Wou
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:18, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>
> Personally I'd like to choose
> Launch Pad. Its open source where Get Satisfaction is only free to us.
>
> However here is today's problem with LaunchPad
>
> I want to discuss a features in the roadmap/blueprint.
>
Well, assuming we make all
We are currently evaluating GetSatisfaction and Launchpad as ways to engage
users/deployments and manage roadmaps/features.
Looking at the IAEP discussion on
what we have accomplished and not accomplished my visions is:
- We have a list of features.
- People can
discuss the features, pr
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:41, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 26.08.2009, at 03:22, Gary C Martin wrote:
>
>> -- Feature roadmap/Concept maps:
>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap/Concept_maps
>>
>> Me, me, ME!! ;-) No, actually Tomeu picked up Labyrinth sugarisation,
>> then I did some UI po
On 26.08.2009, at 03:22, Gary C Martin wrote:
> -- Feature roadmap/Concept maps:
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap/Concept_maps
>
> Me, me, ME!! ;-) No, actually Tomeu picked up Labyrinth sugarisation,
> then I did some UI polishing and hooked up extra features along with
> the talented
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 19:34, Faisal Khan wrote:
> Hi all,
> A quick announcement about the creation of a project to start OLPC in
> Bangladesh.
Congratulations and best wishes in your endeavour.
Will be great to know how Sugar Labs can best help you to succeed.
Regards,
Tomeu
> A fan page ha
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:41, Michael Stone wrote:
> Gary,
>
> I'm tired and sad from talking on this subject but I still don't feel that
> I've been understood. (Or, if I have been, I haven't understood the rebuttals
> of my position, in which case I apologize for being so dense.) Anyway, here's
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
> but, unfortunately, I'm now reassured that I'm right that most of the really
> big interesting Sugar-defining stuff like networking, collaboration,
> hackability, customizablility, performance, simplicity, security, etc. was
> delightfully lab
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 01:34, Dennis Daniels wrote:
> This is a plea.
>
> Sugar has not built successfully for the last five days or so on Ubuntu904.
>
> All the changes that other devs have made cannot be tested because
> one(or more) dev didn't test the build after committing changes. We're
> al
22 matches
Mail list logo