Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] [DESIGN] Journal Reload a new attempt

2010-01-05 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 03:20, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > (oops, wrong subject) > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This post is not about particular feature but about proposed > > to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set. > > IMHO, ins

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] [DESIGN] Journal Reload a new attempt

2010-01-05 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:37:09AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 03:20, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > > (oops, wrong subject) > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > This post is not about particular feature but about pr

Re: [IAEP] Need Live CD to take to Argentina

2010-01-05 Thread Jim Simmons
Caroline, Sorry to confuse you with Caryl. Don't know why I did that. I'll try making up a Fedora 12 CD and booting from it. As I understand it, your idea is simply to see if I can boot the Fedora Live CD, not that this would be an alternative way to boot SoaS Blueberry. I was able to boot Soa

Re: [IAEP] Need Live CD to take to Argentina

2010-01-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 00:56, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 4 Jan 2010, at 23:11, Gary C Martin wrote: > >> Hi Caryl, >> >> On 4 Jan 2010, at 19:33, Caryl Bigenho wrote: >> >>> Hi Gary, (a fellow Mac person... yea!) >>> >>> I really want to do the Live CD rather than the USB version of SoaS... due >>

Re: [IAEP] Need Live CD to take to Argentina

2010-01-05 Thread Caroline Meeks
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Jim Simmons wrote: > Caroline, > > Sorry to confuse you with Caryl. Don't know why I did that. > No problem, > > I'll try making up a Fedora 12 CD and booting from it. As I > understand it, your idea is simply to see if I can boot the Fedora > Live CD, not tha

[IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, Background: Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - sugar stimulates(at least should) doing not just using, our audience could have additional layers - teachers for examples. Projects like

Re: [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Aleksey Lim wrote: > So, the question is should we have special place to treat such issues > in convenient and casual developer/requester friendly manner. -1 1. Fragmentation is bad. We should instead attempt to unify our development sites under an interface that is both friendly to novices and

Re: [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Excellent suggestion! +1 Tomeu On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 17:50, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > Background: > >  Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other >  FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - sugar >  stimulates(at least should) doing not j

Re: [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 17:58, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Aleksey Lim wrote: >> So, the question is should we have special place to treat such issues >> in convenient and casual developer/requester friendly manner. > > -1 > > 1.  Fragmentation is bad.  We should instead attempt to unify our > de

Re: [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Walter Bender
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > Background: > >  Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other >  FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - sugar >  stimulates(at least should) doing not just using, our audience could >

Re: [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:58:17AM -0500, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Aleksey Lim wrote: > > So, the question is should we have special place to treat such issues > > in convenient and casual developer/requester friendly manner. > > -1 > > 1. Fragmentation is bad. We should instead attempt to

Re: [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 18:05, Walter Bender wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Background: >> >>  Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other >>  FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - sugar >>  stimulate

Re: [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Aleksey Lim wrote: > collab.sl.o shouldn't be > "development" site but central point there devs, users, doers, educators > meet. Thus it shouldn't dublicate sites like wiki/track/etc. What do you mean by "meet"? Are you proposing to run a forum? (We already have http://en.forum.laptop.org/) --Be

Re: [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:16:29PM -0500, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Aleksey Lim wrote: > > collab.sl.o shouldn't be > > "development" site but central point there devs, users, doers, educators > > meet. Thus it shouldn't dublicate sites like wiki/track/etc. > > What do you mean by "meet"? Are

Re: [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:05:31PM -0500, Walter Bender wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Background: > > > >  Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other > >  FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - su

Re: [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Caryl Bigenho
+1 OK Folks, let's take a look at this idea of "critical mass." There are 2 kinds of critical mass we need to be thinking about here. Developers, as has been said , are a given. But, even more important is the critical mass of users... ie students and educators who are using Sugar in its va

Re: [IAEP] [POLL] collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-05 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 06:15:46PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > I personally like what Greg Smith did back at OLPC: > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_requests does anyone know the right ml link for http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap#Overview -- now it points to http://lists.laptop.org/