As promised, I kicked our agenda items forward. Turns out you can do a
lot without needing to vote. :)
Our meetbot does some truly awful meeting minutes formatting, but here's
the summary of
http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100711_0446.html:
* Local Labs TM applications
(from the last SLOBs agenda-kickin',
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-July/011343.html)
Question from Kevin Mark: Who should be the deciding organization for
who determines what version of sugar is used in the field?
"I was confused about the hierarchy of who should be the deciding
From the last SLOBs agenda-kicking,
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-July/011343.html:
What are the rights and responsibilities of a SL project?" (This should
be a simple answer, but we need to agree on the same simple answer.)
Right now, we have
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Mel Chua wrote:
> Mel's response: To me, this is very clear - SL decides what version(s)
> of Sugar it will support, and deployments will decide what version(s) of
> Sugar they will use.
Exactly. That's a huge part of the Free in FOSS.
We can all stand on top of
>
> -- MOTION ---
>
> First, the short version:
>
> 1. If your project helps SL, is all freely licensed, and has a wiki page
> with certain info on it, you can apply for project status by emailing
> slobs/iaep your wiki page URL and saying "here's our project page,
> please raise
Speaker's PDF slides:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/File:OLPC_2010Jul11VirtuaFieldTrip.pdf
Please join us in 2 hrs (4PM Sunday, Eastern Time in Boston/NYC) by calling:
+1 (712) 432-3030
Conference Code: 637497
Live Chat Backchannel:
http://forum.laptop.org/chat (that's *#olpc-help* on
El Sun, 11-07-2010 a las 07:24 -0400, Mel Chua escribió:
> [...]
> How reasonable does this sound to everyone? Amendments? Changes? If you
> want to make substantial edits, please throw this on a wiki page and
> send us all the link. ;)
Thanks for taking the time to write this, Mel. I have no
Hi Again, Dinko,
Well, here goes on the big lesson 4.0. I finished checking it just as the World
Cup match was about to start so, I will write this during the dull moments...
if there are any!
This time... I'll do suggestions in red italics and additions in plain red.
Caryl
-
El Sun, 11-07-2010 a las 06:54 -0400, Mel Chua escribió:
> Our meetbot does some truly awful meeting minutes formatting, but here's
> the summary of
> http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100711_0446.html:
It was a wonderful SLOBs un-meeting, we should have more of these!
I've done quite a bit more work on the book and as always I'm looking
for feedback. The book is about all aspects of using e-books with the
Sugar platform: finding them, reading them, creating them, making
e-books from bound and printed books, and publishing them, either on
your own server or by d
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Sun, 11-07-2010 a las 06:54 -0400, Mel Chua escribió:
>
>> Our meetbot does some truly awful meeting minutes formatting, but here's
>> the summary of
>> http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100711_0446.html:
>
>
> It
> This is fine with me, but we never formally approved the earlier
> requests due to a lack of policy at the time. I had forwarded three
> requests (Chile, Argentina, and Paraguay) to the list with the subject
> [TM REQUEST]. Not sure why these requests are considered "lost". I'd
> like to formally
12 matches
Mail list logo
