Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-11 Thread José Miguel García
Buena idea Caryl! Quizá se pueda comenzar con algunas grabaciones cortas, que permitan que los maestros vean qué posibilidades hay con algunas de las aplicaciones disponibles, más desde lo pedagógico. Hay maestros con mucha experiencia en esto, y muy innovadores... Y una Sugar Fest es excelente!

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-09 Thread Caryl Bigenho
Sugarizer is the best way to get Sugar into classrooms in the USA. No cost for the devices... The kids already have them. Start small with a mini "Sugarizer For Schools." Have great documentation and easy to use, fail-safe, lesson plans available free online. Present and demo at teachers confere

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-08 Thread Laura Vargas
El 7 de julio de 2016, 7:52, Dave Crossland escribió: > > On 7 July 2016 at 08:49, José Miguel García > wrote: > >> Sin embargo, a través de la experiencia de Argentina en Conectar >> Igualdad, donde se daba la posibilidad de que cada centro instalara su >> sistema. > > > Wow, that's amazing!! :

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-07 Thread Dave Crossland
On 7 July 2016 at 08:49, José Miguel García wrote: > Sin embargo, a través de la experiencia de Argentina en Conectar Igualdad, > donde se daba la posibilidad de que cada centro instalara su sistema. Wow, that's amazing!! :D I guess in the USA it is common to create bad lawsuits if things go w

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-07 Thread José Miguel García
Hola! De acuerdo con Dave que es difícil. Sin embargo, a través de la experiencia de Argentina en Conectar Igualdad, donde se daba la posibilidad de que cada centro instalara su sistema. Si bien en un principio la mayoría optaba por Windows se realizó un movimiento importante para la instalación de

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-07 Thread Dave Crossland
2016-07-07 7:45 GMT-04:00 José Miguel García : > Sostenemos, sin embargo, que si los dispositivos hubieran contado con > Windows, el SO más conocido, su uso habría sido para seguir haciendo más de > lo mismo. I think that is great :) However, it seems possible only with either a top-down state

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-07 Thread José Miguel García
Hola! Gracias Caryl por el relato, que es muy interesante. Lo que hemos aprendido de la experiencia en Uruguay, donde el proyecto tiene ya 9 años y es un despliegue a nivel nacional, es que los procesos son lentos, a pesar de los espacios de formación para los maestros. A pesar de esto, los avances

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-06 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Caryl On 6 July 2016 at 20:12, Caryl Bigenho wrote: > Actually, > (I am also grateful for Sameer and José Miguel's input, but unlike Adam and Tony who I mentioned, they are not participating here very much which is why I didn't mention them.) I understand that you think SL should be develop

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-06 Thread Caryl Bigenho
: d...@lab6.com Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 18:03:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe To: cbige...@hotmail.com CC: walter.ben...@gmail.com; la...@somosazucar.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org Hi Thanks Caryl, this is all very informative and I'm glad you are here to explain

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-06 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Thanks Caryl, this is all very informative and I'm glad you are here to explain this context :) On 6 July 2016 at 17:18, Caryl Bigenho wrote: > Teacher training and "buy-in" is essential for Sugar/Sugarizer to succeed > no matter what platform, language, or country you/we are working in. Thi

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-06 Thread Caryl Bigenho
miss. Until we address it "Big Time" we aren't going to see much progress. Caryl From: walter.ben...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 01:12:46 -0400 To: d...@lab6.com CC: la...@somosazucar.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe I agree with D

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-05 Thread Walter Bender
I agree with Dave. It is really oriented towards school programs (in teh US) and professional development. I don't think it is a good match for Sugar Labs. -walter On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > > > On 5 July 2016 at 20:56, Laura Vargas wrote: > >> Please read: >> >> >

Re: [IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-05 Thread Dave Crossland
On 5 July 2016 at 20:56, Laura Vargas wrote: > Please read: > > > http://tech.ed.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Tech-Federal-Funds-Final-V2.pdf > > Nice find! Its great to see support for Open Educational Resources and that school districts can get federal funds to buy computer devices. However,

[IAEP] #Documentation SL Funding Committe

2016-07-05 Thread Laura Vargas
Please read: http://tech.ed.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Tech-Federal-Funds-Final-V2.pdf Regards and blessings -- Laura V. I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org IRC kaametza Happy Learning! ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.suga