@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] OLPC rules out Windows for XO-3
Ian
Do you think that the solution is to create a new and more narrow list which
meets the needs of deployers and teachers or to narrow the scope of IAEP and
moderate it to keep it within scope?
My understanding
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 4:35 AM
To: Peter Robinson
Cc: Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero; marketing; b...@alum.mit.edu; iaep
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] OLPC rules out Windows for XO-3
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:43
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
Linux has been running well on ARM for a long long time.
Yeah. In specific, today I got Sugar running on the ARM SoC we'll be
using for XO-1.75 and XO-3, and it didn't require any porting at all.
It would have
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
Linux has been running well on ARM for a long long time.
Yeah. In specific, today I got Sugar running on the ARM SoC we'll be
using for
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
Linux has been running well on ARM for a long long time.
Yeah.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org
[mailto:iaep-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Sayamindu Dasgupta
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 4:35 AM
To: Peter Robinson
Cc: Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero; marketing; b...@alum.mit.edu; iaep
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] OLPC rules out Windows for XO-3
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:56 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Do you think that the solution is to create a new and more narrow list
No more lists please ;-) ! Move thread to d...@lists.laptop.org where
it belongs ;-)
Mostly the same crowd, but not quite.
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
...@ozonline.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:57 AM
To: Ian Thomson
Cc: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] OLPC rules out Windows for XO-3
Ian
Do you think that the solution is to create a new and more narrow list which
meets the needs of deployers and teachers or to narrow
Coordinator
SPC
Phone +687 26 01 44
-Original Message-
From: fors...@ozonline.com.au [mailto:fors...@ozonline.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:57 AM
To: Ian Thomson
Cc: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] OLPC rules out Windows for XO-3
Ian
Do
I doubt I'm the first to ask...
Any thoughts about accessibility and touch screens? Voice
recognition? External keyboard / mouse (perhaps wireless)?
Or just offer alternative inexpensive computers, SoaS, etc.,
recognizing that one size does not fit all?
--
Kevin Cole
Sugar Labs DC
Washington,
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Kevin Cole kjc...@dc.sugarlabs.org wrote:
I doubt I'm the first to ask...
Any thoughts about accessibility and touch screens? Voice
recognition? External keyboard / mouse (perhaps wireless)?
Or just offer alternative inexpensive computers, SoaS, etc.,
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:31 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@cscott.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Kevin Cole kjc...@dc.sugarlabs.org wrote:
I doubt I'm the first to ask...
Any thoughts about accessibility and touch screens? Voice
recognition? External keyboard / mouse (perhaps
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 17:52, John Tierney jtis4...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thought this article would be of interest to the community.
OLPC Rules out Windows for XO-3
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/052710-olpc-rules-out-windows-for.html
Ed's mentions of Sugar, Sugar Labs and the Sugar
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 17:52, John Tierney jtis4...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thought this article would be of interest to the community.
OLPC Rules out Windows for XO-3
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 15:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 17:52, John Tierney jtis4...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thought this article would be of interest to the community.
OLPC Rules out
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 15:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 17:52, John Tierney jtis4...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 18:38, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 15:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 18:38, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 15:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 18:38, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
I strongly encourage the Sugar team to consider rethinking the Sugar
UI from the ground up for touch. The simple port is likely to yield
a very unsatisfactory experience; fat fingers are just not precise
pointing devices, and a lot of gestures which seem intuitive for a
mouse don't really work
On 06/03/2010 01:45 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
My suggestion would be to first convene a ground up rethink of what
a touch-based Sugar could be.
...
The result should be a
*book*, which describes the ideal UI. That will be the long term
(think, next decade!) goals for Sugar.
That's a
Hi Tim,
As soon as I heard that OLPC was moving to ARM, I winced
slightly. This is going to make life much more difficult, because
of our longstanding Linux, Python and recent GNOME heritage. What
is Sugar Labs' role with the XO-3+?
I don't understand -- the XO-3 (and XO-1.5)
After spending some time with touch based devices,
I have to agree with Scott. Yes, you can bolt on
support for single touch to many activities, but doing
a good job of supporting multitouch is typically a complete
UI redesign.
We are trying to get an accelerometer into the design
as well as
On 4 June 2010 09:07, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi Tim,
As soon as I heard that OLPC was moving to ARM, I winced
slightly. This is going to make life much more difficult, because
of our longstanding Linux, Python and recent GNOME heritage. What
is Sugar Labs' role with
Hi,
Linux has been running well on ARM for a long long time.
Yeah. In specific, today I got Sugar running on the ARM SoC we'll be
using for XO-1.75 and XO-3, and it didn't require any porting at all.
It would have happened yesterday, but I had to work out how to get
past the Sugar
Hi All...
See comment/question below
Caryl
From: w...@laptop.org
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:27:12 -0400
To: csc...@cscott.net
CC: market...@lists.sugarlabs.org; to...@sugarlabs.org;
iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; raf...@sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] OLPC rules out Windows
27 matches
Mail list logo
