On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 09:41:13PM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote:
> ...
> > The motion is controversial as it is a personal closed selection of
> > candidates.
>
> Sure, it was controversial, that much is clear, but you must accept
> that the motion was agreed, and now you must do
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Laura Vargas
wrote:
> ...
>> > The motion is controversial as it is a personal closed selection of
>> > candidates.
>>
>> Sure, it was controversial, that much is clear, but you must accept
>> that the motion was agreed, and now you must do these things;
>>
>
> J
>
> ...
> > The motion is controversial as it is a personal closed selection of
> > candidates.
>
> Sure, it was controversial, that much is clear, but you must accept
> that the motion was agreed, and now you must do these things;
>
James,
As I feel "forced" to accept new members I have no motiv
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 06:54:11PM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote:
> Any reference for the motion candidates expressing their wish to be
> part of the Committee would be in order.
That's not necessary.
The oversight board has decided that Pericherla, Hirish and
Ibiam are members of the membership and
Can we please move on? Regardless of the merit of bringing this to SLOB,
the vote was taken, the motion passed. I think James was quite clear
regarding next steps. Lets please get back to the work of the committee
itself.
regards.
-walter
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
>
2017-09-07 17:19 GMT-05:00 James Cameron :
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 04:56:49PM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote:
> >
> > 2017-09-07 15:51 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy <[1]samsongo...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 at 9:08 PM Lionel Laské <[2]
> lionel.la...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
Since we are in the spirit of Openness i will like to express my feelings.
First, i will like to thank you for the support and time "you" have spent
in making the timetable for this election. I highlighted "you" in that
sentence, because over 70% of discussion made from the membership/election
co
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 04:56:49PM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
> 2017-09-07 15:51 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy <[1]samsongo...@gmail.com>:
>
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 at 9:08 PM Lionel Laské <[2]lionel.la...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> -1 for the motion.
>
> As James said, I don't thi
2017-09-07 15:51 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy :
>
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 at 9:08 PM Lionel Laské wrote:
>
>> -1 for the motion.
>>
>> As James said, I don't think adding more Sugar Labs members will give
>> more transparency.
>>
>> Good point to make an open call if there is more volunteer but do a
>> mo
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 at 9:08 PM Lionel Laské wrote:
> -1 for the motion.
>
> As James said, I don't think adding more Sugar Labs members will give
> more transparency.
>
> Good point to make an open call if there is more volunteer but do a motion
> to "force" new members to the committee is not fai
-1 for the motion.
As James said, I don't think adding more Sugar Labs members will give more
transparency.
Good point to make an open call if there is more volunteer but do a motion
to "force" new members to the committee is not fair.
Plus except if I miss something I didn't seen in this thread
+1
Sameer
On Sep 6, 2017 2:43 PM, "Ignacio Rodríguez" wrote:
> It's +1 from me.
>
> But I will leave SLOBs once this happen, I honestly don't have time, and I
> no longer feel motivated to be part of the SLOBs.
> I will remain as a Sugar Labs, and will mantain some systems if required.
>
> Than
It's +1 from me.
But I will leave SLOBs once this happen, I honestly don't have time, and I
no longer feel motivated to be part of the SLOBs.
I will remain as a Sugar Labs, and will mantain some systems if required.
Thanks.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks all f
+1
Thanks all for updating
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Governance/Committees#Membership_and_Elections_Committee
if this is approved -- with personal background on all Membership/Elections
Committee members -- so we can better avoid conflict-of-interest
accusations/patterns of late, mo
I would think membership on the committee would be a unilateral decision by
the committee itself. In any case, +1 from me.
-walter
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Samson Goddy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am requesting to SLOB. To add Pericherla Seetaramaraju (Google Summer
> of Code Intern), Hirish
15 matches
Mail list logo