Lionel,
I confess that I find this "do you really need me there?" style of
thinking rather unfortunate, and personally believe that any SLOB member
should feel obligated to attend the monthly meetings, unless something
specific is preventing you from doing so. It was a clear obligation when
Has anyone put together the equivalent of
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2015-2016-candidates for this
year? Are there any candidate statements published in the wiki?
regards.
-walter
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Laura Vargas wrote:
> Not sure what you
Hi Caryl!
On 12 May 2016 at 11:08, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 12 May 2016 at 10:51, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
>
>> Dues are a bad idea!
>> Sorry folks
>>
>
> Please could you explain why you think this?
>
I'm keen to understand your concern :)
--
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 12 May 2016 at 11:09, Sean DALY wrote:
>>
>> Sam - I'm not aware that anyone here is other than "us volunteers".
>
>
> Well, there's now a paid Translatoins Manager
Yes there is and I am
On 12 May 2016 at 11:09, Sean DALY wrote:
> Sam - I'm not aware that anyone here is other than "us volunteers".
>
Well, there's now a paid Translatoins Manager
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Sam Parkinson
wrote:
> Us volunteers write code, make releases, do user testing, etc.
Sam - I'm not aware that anyone here is other than "us volunteers".
Dues are how many if not most normally functioning nonprofits operate. I am
Hi
On 12 May 2016 at 10:51, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Dues are a bad idea!
> Sorry folks
>
Please could you explain why you think this?
--
Cheers
Dave
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
Dues are a bad idea!
Sorry folks
Caryl
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 12, 2016, at 7:17 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>
>> On 11 May 2016 at 22:28, Sam Parkinson wrote:
>> Is a membership fee for volunteers even something that any other Free
>> Software
On 11 May 2016 at 22:28, Sam Parkinson wrote:
> Is a membership fee for volunteers even something that any other Free
> Software orgs do? GNOME doesn't seem to.
>
Its very common for clubs/nonprofits to do this. FSF, Conservancy, TUG,
UKTUG run membership programs,
+ 1 to Sam P.
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:28:23 +1000
From: sam.parkins...@gmail.com
To: la...@somosazucar.org
CC: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org;
olpc-...@lists.laptop.org; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; d...@lab6.com
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting
I'm not a big fan of this idea.
The SLOBs already seem to have some capital. But they seem to be
scared to spend it. How much arguing have we done over the translation
co-ordinator position? Something like a translation position would be
great, but nobody has seemed to actually do anything
2016-05-12 2:08 GMT+08:00 Dave Crossland :
>
> On 11 May 2016 at 14:05, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
>> there are ~US$65,000 available for planning/distributing among
>> activities/teams/projects etc.
>
>
> I think its essential that this be spent in ways that led
On 11 May 2016 at 14:05, Laura Vargas wrote:
> there are ~US$65,000 available for planning/distributing among
> activities/teams/projects etc.
I think its essential that this be spent in ways that led directly to
further income, to grow the project.
2016-05-12 2:03 GMT+08:00 Chris Leonard :
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> >
> > On 11 May 2016 at 13:03, Laura Vargas wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry I missed to explain this. By the date of the agreement (2012),
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 11 May 2016 at 13:03, Laura Vargas wrote:
>>
>> Sorry I missed to explain this. By the date of the agreement (2012), the
>> Project agreed that, on the Effective Date, $1,887.44 (10% of the
On 11 May 2016 at 13:03, Laura Vargas wrote:
> Sorry I missed to explain this. By the date of the agreement (2012), the
> Project agreed that, on the Effective Date, $1,887.44 (10% of the existing
> Project Fund on the Effective Date), will be donated to Conservancy’s
>
2016-05-12 0:56 GMT+08:00 Dave Crossland :
>
>
> On 11 May 2016 at 12:50, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
>> You are totally right Adam, I'm sorry I did not notice these were
>> cumulative values. Corrected table would look like this:
>>
>>
>>
>> Total Income 10% of
On 11 May 2016 at 12:50, Laura Vargas wrote:
> You are totally right Adam, I'm sorry I did not notice these were
> cumulative values. Corrected table would look like this:
>
>
>
> Total Income 10% of Total Income
>
>
>
> 2015 $9.028,56 $902,86
> 2014 $49.622,18 $4.962,22
>
You are totally right Adam, I'm sorry I did not notice these were
cumulative values. Corrected table would look like this:
Total Income 10% of Total Income
2015 $9.028,56 $902,86
2014 $49.622,18 $4.962,22
2013 $49.229,19 $4.922,92
2012 $208,26 $1.908,27
*Total* *$108.088,19* *$12.696,26*
On May 11, 2016 11:19 AM, "Laura Vargas" wrote:
>
> 2016-05-08 0:20 GMT+08:00 Adam Holt :
>>
>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Chris Leonard
wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Chris Leonard
2016-05-08 0:20 GMT+08:00 Adam Holt :
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Chris Leonard
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Chris Leonard
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Adam Holt
100
CC: sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org;
sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; olpc-...@lists.laptop.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open
issues to discuss
Well, I won't go against lionel, but I have something to say. Is not as if
ever
Well, I won't go against lionel, but I have something to say. Is not as if
everyone wants to take money from SL but for the benefit for the SugarLabs. If
we keep using this mindset I don't we will be able to grow bigger as planned.
My project was for the betterment for both Nigeria and SL. Like
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Chris Leonard
wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Chris Leonard
> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> In other words that SL's effective
On 7 May 2016 at 11:47, Chris Leonard wrote:
> > I'm looking for an executed copy of the current SugarLabs-SFC FSA to
> > confirm, unfortunately the wiki version looks at variance with the
> > template, but as a wiki page, it has no "official" status.
> >
> >
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Chris Leonard wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> In other words that SL's effective payment to SFConservancy (for
>> legal/financial/administrative service) is equal to 10% of all
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
...
> In other words that SL's effective payment to SFConservancy (for
> legal/financial/administrative service) is equal to 10% of all expenditures
> (outlays) each fiscal year, i.e. March 1st to end of February.
>
> (But
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
>
> 2016-05-07 9:28 GMT+08:00 Adam Holt :
>
>> On May 6, 2016 5:45 PM, "Laura Vargas" wrote:
>> > the budget allowed for Chris Leonard's Internationalization tasks
>>
2016-05-07 9:28 GMT+08:00 Adam Holt :
> On May 6, 2016 5:45 PM, "Laura Vargas" wrote:
> > the budget allowed for Chris Leonard's Internationalization tasks
> (USD$12,000.00)
>
> On this narrow point, I'd (assume) Translation Community Manager outlay
>
On May 6, 2016 5:45 PM, "Laura Vargas" wrote:
> the budget allowed for Chris Leonard's Internationalization tasks
(USD$12,000.00)
On this narrow point, I'd (assume) Translation Community Manager outlay
represents $12,000 + 10% for SFConservancy = $13,200 total, from May
2016-05-07 2:25 GMT+08:00 Adam Holt :
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Karen Sandler
> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-05-06 12:06, Adam Holt wrote:
>>
>> s/he tries to do that, SFConservancy has explained to me that they
>>> often take a month-or-so to get all
..@gmail.com; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org;
> lio...@olpc-france.org; olpc-...@lists.laptop.org;
> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org; t...@olenepal.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder
>
>
> Hi
>
> On 31 March 2016 at
; sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org;
t...@olenepal.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder
Hi
On 31 March 2016 at 04:02, Samson Goddy <samsongo...@gmail.com> wrote:
I will suggest that the samson proposal should be taken first in the
meeting to
Hi
On 31 March 2016 at 04:02, Samson Goddy wrote:
> I will suggest that the samson proposal should be taken first in the
> meeting tomorrow. the meeting is 8pm by nigerian time and the cyber
> cafe i will using closes by 9pm. so i dont want to miss out.
>
On 1 April 2016
2016-03-31 8:20 GMT+08:00 Walter Bender :
> Here is the current agenda:
>
> Agenda:
> 1. Google Summer of Code status (Walter)
> 2. Wiki Cleanup Party planning (Walter)
> 3. Request from Edgar Quispe to attend Traducción e interpretación en las
> lenguas originarias del
On 30 March 2016 at 20:20, Walter Bender wrote:
> 7. Treasurer position and process (Adam and Caryl) See [1]
>
...
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/16jIFuZ9bX
> -Bv675BpA1KmcEcRcX4PRCOUEX0ICRUkOc/edit
I read the doc and the structure of the policy seems good,
On Mar 30, 2016 8:20 PM, "Walter Bender" wrote:
>
> Here is the current agenda:
>
> Agenda:
> 1. Google Summer of Code status (Walter)
> 2. Wiki Cleanup Party planning (Walter)
> 3. Request from Edgar Quispe to attend Traducción e interpretación en las
lenguas originarias
Here is the current agenda:
Agenda:
1. Google Summer of Code status (Walter)
2. Wiki Cleanup Party planning (Walter)
3. Request from Edgar Quispe to attend Traducción e interpretación en las
lenguas originarias del Perú meeting in Lima (Walter and CJL)
4. I18n manager discussion (Tony)
5.
During February's meeting I was assigned to report back during March's
meeting ideas on how to replace continuously inactive board members -- in a
respectful, consistent and most professional way -- to protect the vibrancy
of our legacy.
Then during March's meeting, time did not permit me to
39 matches
Mail list logo