On my Thinkpad X61, I have lots of problems on 2.6.26.1 when toggling
rfkill switches and buttons, including kernel crashes, so I'm trying
out 2.6.27-rc3. Rfkill seems much better behaved, but Network-manager
is not very happy with it and no longer notices when the radio is
killed.
I think this i
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Or maybe some hacks from SLED
"reverse engineering" from a Lenovo SLED preinstalled working laptop
I rebooted my laptop and went back to SLED10 (I still have it with dual
boot) to look for a clue of what makes the Fn keys work in it, or as you
said maybe a SLED special
> No, the problem we discussed here is not a regression.
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658
> And the patch just works for the laptops that:
> 1. without passive trip point
> 2. with a passive trip point that doesn't help because it is too close
> to the critical trip point.
Ok.
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 16:00 +0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:14:14PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> >
> >> So what is the status here, how should we proceed?
> >> This isn't applied to any tree yet?
> >> IMO you should send those two with below fixe
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:00:26AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The problem seems to be that some people report this as a regression.
> So either:
Yeah. I'm unconvinced that this is the right solution for the Thinkpad
case.
> - It's an regression. Then something must have been changed. Do we know
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:14:14PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
>> So what is the status here, how should we proceed?
>> This isn't applied to any tree yet?
>> IMO you should send those two with below fixed and Andi could queue them on
>> the test branch and keep it a
