On Thu, 12 May 2011, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Still, someone who has an older laptop should test it, because all I
> can do is pretend I carefully inspected all the possible code paths.
Will do, will do. Please be patient. I will have thinkpad-acpi time this
weekend :-)
As you all noticed by
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 03:33:54PM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:50:54AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >>
> >> I do, however, have a question for the input people. Dmitry: Lenovo
>
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:50:54AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> I do, however, have a question for the input people. Dmitry: Lenovo
>> makes laptops which are kind enough to tell us that the volume changed
>> by se
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:55:50AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> Beats me. I used cp to copy it, and it works here. I don't see why
>> rsync should be any different.
>>
>> --Andy
>
> Narry a day passeth but that some new learning expe
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:55:50AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Beats me. I used cp to copy it, and it works here. I don't see why
> rsync should be any different.
>
> --Andy
Narry a day passeth but that some new learning experience is pressed upon
me:
root@jeremiah /home/mingdao # rm
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:34:07AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Bruce Hill wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:16:12AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >> It's /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/DSDT
> >>
> >> If you're feeling fancy you can copy it somewhere and r
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:50:54AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
> I do, however, have a question for the input people. Dmitry: Lenovo
> makes laptops which are kind enough to tell us that the volume changed
> by sending a keystroke over the atkbd-based keyboard. (wtf!) I've
> m
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:16:12AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> It's /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/DSDT
>>
>> If you're feeling fancy you can copy it somewhere and run iasl -d on
>> it, but the binary version will do.
>>
>> --Andy
>
> root@je
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:16:12AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> It's /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/DSDT
>
> If you're feeling fancy you can copy it somewhere and run iasl -d on
> it, but the binary version will do.
>
> --Andy
And btw ... I'm no the list. If you are, also, we can stop Cc'ing ;)
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:16:12AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> It's /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/DSDT
>
> If you're feeling fancy you can copy it somewhere and run iasl -d on
> it, but the binary version will do.
>
> --Andy
root@jeremiah ~ # iasl -d /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/DSDT
Intel ACPI
[Hi, Dmitry -- there's an input layer question in here for you]
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > It looks like SAUM was introduced with the
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > It looks like SAUM was introduced with the *61 machines, and it's
> > identical from then on.
>
> I wonder the machines with SAUM are the same as the machines on which
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:18:46PM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> Henrique, do you know of anywhere to find AML dumps from different models?
>> It would be nice to see what SAUM looks like.
>
> It looks like SAUM was introduced with the
It's /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/DSDT
If you're feeling fancy you can copy it somewhere and run iasl -d on
it, but the binary version will do.
--Andy
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:48:27PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:48:27PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:18:46PM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > Henrique, do you know of anywhere to find AML dumps from different models?
> > It would be nice to see what SAUM looks like.
>
> It looks like SAUM was introdu
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:18:46PM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Henrique, do you know of anywhere to find AML dumps from different models?
> It would be nice to see what SAUM looks like.
It looks like SAUM was introduced with the *61 machines, and it's
identical from then on.
--
Matthew Gar
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> On Mon, 09 May 2011, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> I read some more of the spec. It looks like the EC sends query 43
>> when the mute status changes.
>>
>> The problem is that _Q43 just calls _UCMS, which issues an SMI but
>> doe
On Mon, 09 May 2011, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> I read some more of the spec. It looks like the EC sends query 43
> when the mute status changes.
>
> The problem is that _Q43 just calls _UCMS, which issues an SMI but
> does nothing else. So we don't get notified. And unless we change
> acpi_ec_
On Mon, 09 May 2011, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > Don't we get an HKEY notification for mute presses in the X220?
>
> I just meant to figure out what's going on. We're not getting an HKEY
> event, I think, but something's happening and a bit of acpi debug
> fiddling says that _Q43 is getting call
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 May 2011, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>> FWIW, this patch (other than having the wrong default on X220) makes
>>> Linux better than Windows :)
>>
>> Please
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> On Mon, 09 May 2011, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> FWIW, this patch (other than having the wrong default on X220) makes
>> Linux better than Windows :)
>
> Please expand on that, especially the "wrong default on X220"...
>
>> Do yo
On Mon, 09 May 2011, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> FWIW, this patch (other than having the wrong default on X220) makes
> Linux better than Windows :)
Please expand on that, especially the "wrong default on X220"...
> Do you know how to read a field from the EC by name? I think I can
If it is in t
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> Interesting. Let me test it on my T43, it has hardware volume and seems to
> cover a class of box you couldn't test.
>
> I like the idea, but I might have some questions to ask you about it. More
> on this after I test the patc
Interesting. Let me test it on my T43, it has hardware volume and seems to
cover a class of box you couldn't test.
I like the idea, but I might have some questions to ask you about it. More
on this after I test the patch in the next few days.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find t
ThinkPads have hardware volume controls and three buttons to control
them. (These are separate from the standard mixer.) By default,
the buttons are:
- Mute: Mutes the hardware volume control and generates KEY_MUTE.
- Up: Unmutes, generates KEY_VOLUMEUP, and increases volume if
applicable.
25 matches
Mail list logo
