In a recent note, Gerhard Postpischil said:
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:27:46 -0400
I consulted at a government agency where I found code that's very clear
and easy to understand:
TM flag,1
BZ label
NI flag,255-1
label .
Well, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerhard Postpischil said the following on 07/16/2005 07:32 AM:
| IBM does this one the other side, too. I'm used to putting comments and
| change dates on code, but there are several macros that explicitly check
| for parameters and fail; e.g.
Paul Gilmartin writes:
And, in this list, I was recently admonished for writing a
superflous pair of parentheses in a JCL IF statement. I'm
still trying to decide whether to follow up with a humble and
grateful apology, or a defiant defense.
and since I was the putative admonisher, I will
In a recent note, john gilmore said:
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:59:23 +
My first comment was more anthropological than technical.
Somewhat akin to the election of abbandonate over lasciate,
which is at least projectively anthropological.
My feeling about the use of these
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, john gilmore said:
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:59:23 +
My first comment was more anthropological than technical.
Somewhat akin to the election of abbandonate over lasciate,
which is at least projectively anthropological.
My feeling
Several new IBM Fellows were recently named. Anyone been following their
activities ?
Paul Hanrahan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Paul Hanrahan wrote:
Several new IBM Fellows were recently named. Anyone been following their
activities ?
Paul Hanrahan
Where's the list?
-Steve Comstock
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Hi,
I know the following info:
1. David Pitts has a OS/390 GCC port version[1]. But the last
modification is 2002/12/11, the gcc version is only 3.2 and the OS
version is only OS.390 2.9. Who has experience about David Pitts'
OS/390 GCC version?
2. There are official gcc port versions
Have your scheduler run the job under a different ID. Then tell WLM. Use
this as a shop policy to control which jobs get higher juice. Security
folks may freak out, but don't ask them; just tell them :-)
Changing your business priorities on the fly is a bad precedent, IMHO.
Gets people in the
Yes and no. Most jobs have (or should have) a HOTBATCH service class.
Shuffling it in there sounds like the right thing to do. Issuing that
SVC 34 in a little program of ten lines or less (or even with the JES
mod that allows you to issue operator commands) can be done in about a
gazillion
Or so intended to mean as large a value as practical for the
situation. Some may have constraints where the maximum may cause
problems. And, even when not constrained, the maximum may not be
appropriate.
Perhaps the ideal case would be to start with the max, then decrease in
20% steps until the
In a recent note, Rolf Ernst said:
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:43:41 -0500
That's because TSO spawns a subtask for every command. There is probably
little you can do about it besides VLF.
Gee, hasn't IBM heard that attached tasks can run concurrently?
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Is OG orphaned storage (Memory leak) or still owned by someone?
Our list of OG storage contains a lot of entries and I believe they are still
owned by someone.
How did you handle them? Did you ask the ISV or IBM about them?
I've seen a large for RRS and IBM raise FIN APAR OW57028.
I now have
Anybody using this? I always get a clean S2C6 RSN 200 while running in
SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2 environment. Of course it works in SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=1
and generate
* LINKX MACRO SUBSTITUTED FOR LINK MACRO BECAUSE ASCENV=AR/ANYX02-LINK
, AMODE64=YES, OR ARCHLVL1 SPECIFIED ON PREVIOUSLY ISSUX
Volker Bandke wrote:
| for parameters and fail; e.g. GTSIZE , GP05197
| gets you a parameter error message, whereas SPACE , and 'normal' macros
| don't.
That's why I have always started my comments with a comma
Note that the above has a comma, but in the case of GTSIZE
Ken.Porowski wrote:
I saw a reference on the list that JBB7727 (Console
Restructure/enhancements) was required to run an OSA-ICC.
Can anyone confirm or deny this?
Deny...JBB7727 has nothing to do with supporting the OSA-ICC. Suggest you
read OSA-Express Integrated Console Controller
I'm happy to provide an explanation for the reason for my question.
I work for Allen System Group, in the mainframe group that used to be
Landmark. Several of the products we produce use WTOs for trace messages.
In a development environment, with multiple products running in diagnostic
mode all
On Jul 16, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Todd Burch wrote:
I'm happy to provide an explanation for the reason for my question.
I work for Allen System Group, in the mainframe group that used to be
Landmark. Several of the products we produce use WTOs for trace
messages.
In a development environment,
18 matches
Mail list logo
