On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:40:53PM -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The last couple of funky spec manuals in which I saw instruction
> timings were absolutely laden with special cases. Were IBM to publish
> one for the z9, it would make strong men weep.
I'm not surpris
Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
At my installations we handled vendor products by:
[snip]
There seems to be some confusion about what's been proposed in this thread.
Paul Gilmarten's comments -- inspired by my observation that, unlike
ISPF, TSO EDIT does not require a "slew" of data sets allocat
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:23:39AM -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
> When I was a programmer working on the Intercomm Teleprocessing
> Monitor product, I wrote the routine that allowed the Archive to be
> read backwards not only from Tape but DASD. It was fun to wrote the
> code to allow the D
Thomas Berg wrote:
And how do You solve the situation when the vendor have their own macros
they want to have in maclib (and doesn't supply their own lib) that
overwrites previously existing macors (if we would choose to install as
instrucyed) ?
Or when you have several different version that Y
Has anyone encountered either of the following two situations recently (
say the last 6 months or so )?
IEC023I 237-08,IFG0553F
IEC140I ddname ,vv END OF DATA SET NOT ON VOLUME
IEFTMS50 1XX- 08 jobname,stepname ,ddname ,ccuu,vv
IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT
SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=1EB R
Sort of. If you are using static VIPA and have SOURCEVIPA specified,
then the outbound source address will be the last VIPA address specified
before a real interface. Example:
OSA1 10.1.1.1
OSA2 10.1.2.1
VIPA1 10.100.1.1
OSA3 10.1.3.1
OSA4 10.1.4.1
VIAP2 10.200.1.1
OSA5 10.1.5.1
OSA6
Yep, that exactly what it mean.
Depends on what your companies other leased line applciation are. But
in the long run most likely. AT&T is migrating everything off of the
old SNA network on to their MPLS network, Internet, or Frame Relay.
Unless of course you build your own and just lease th
On Oct 22, 2005, at 4:32 PM, ibm-main wrote:
Another of gils lunatic flights of fancy.
Allow the ISVs to insist on dataset naming standards .
And SMPE zone structure next no doubt ???.
Like hell.
Shane,
Its being done already (and for quite a few years). An Hospital company
(that suppli
On Oct 22, 2005, at 2:09 PM, Ed Finnell wrote:
In a message dated 10/22/2005 1:17:38 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An alternative explanation, for those who believe in such things, is
that we have some sort of "psychic connection". ;-)
Probably need a new numb
Another of gils lunatic flights of fancy.
Allow the ISVs to insist on dataset naming standards .
And SMPE zone structure next no doubt ???.
Like hell.
Pull your head in Paul - get the documentation generic enough to be useful.
Let us manange our sites so we can get real work done.
Programmers
Im also wondering how would I RSF if I need to with IBM?
Andy S White
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Brian Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List"
10/22/2005 04:02 PM
Please respond to "IBM Mainframe Discussion List"
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.ED
Brian Peterson wrote:
Does anyone out there know about this? This announcement appears on the
IBMLink Main Menu when you press PF2 to display NEWS:
_
| NEWSScrolling is active. Press CANCEL to exit.
| ATTENTION: IBMLink Customers
|
What is maximum number of Coupling Facilities used by one sysplex ?
I know it's rather theoretical limit, but I'd like to know it.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructio
Does anyone out there know about this? This announcement appears on the
IBMLink Main Menu when you press PF2 to display NEWS:
_
| NEWSScrolling is active. Press CANCEL to exit.
| ATTENTION: IBMLink Customers
|
In a message dated 10/22/2005 1:17:38 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An alternative explanation, for those who believe in such things, is
that we have some sort of "psychic connection". ;-)
>>
Probably need a new number for psychic friends Help Desk. 'I've got a
I don't quite understand You:
== Paul Gilmartin == wrote2005-10-22 17:28:
In a recent note, Edward E. Jaffe said:
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:56:06 -0700
Sounds like I'm in the minority here, but I like the approach of using
EDIT for basic editing in the environment you'
From: "Edward E. Jaffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An alternative explanation, for those who believe in such things, is that
we have some sort of "psychic connection". ;-)
Is that in any way similar to a workstation connection, or are they 2
different things?
:-)
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - The
Dave Salt wrote:
Ed,
I can't believe it. I wrote my response about the WSA (and even
renamed the subject to 'WSA versus ISPGUI') before reading your
response. Our comments about the WSA being confused with ISPGUI were
almost identical!
That's what generally happens when you state obvious
From: Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Still wondering: is WSA the same as ISPGUI?
No, they're 2 completely different things. ISPGUI requires the WSA, just
like WordPad requires Windows. But that doesn't make them the same.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - The easiest, most powerful way to surf a m
From: "Edward E. Jaffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Your idea of passing 327x streams to a socket is weak compared to what WSA
already does. You're making the classic mistake of confusing the WSA
(Workstation Agent) with the ISPF GUI.
The ISPF GUI is just one component of the WSA. Other capabilities o
From: Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2. Bring WSA back from the dead and fix it.
>
Is this the dreaded ISPGUI?
The ISPGUI window was just plain ugly.
Gil,
In my opinion, the ISPF WorkStation Agent (WSA) is brilliant, but I agree
with you that ISPGUI leaves much to be desired. Unfortuna
In a recent note, Edward E. Jaffe said:
> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:19:29 -0700
>
> In a fairly recent conversation on this subject, the ISPF development
> team in OZ suggested that if I had specific requirements for WSA, they
> would be interested to hear what they were.
>
Still wonderi
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
2. Bring WSA back from the dead and fix it.
Is this the dreaded ISPGUI? I'd favor an approach which writes
classic 327x data streams to a socket, and instructions for
modifying an open-source x3270 client to fun
In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:00:40 -0300
>
> >Kludgey, but how about:
>
> Bletch! There are cleaner ways to handle it:
>
See above.
> 1. Use explicit partitions
>
Would this support concurrent sessions with different
active TIOTs?
>
In a recent note, Edward E. Jaffe said:
> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:56:06 -0700
>
> Sounds like I'm in the minority here, but I like the approach of using
> EDIT for basic editing in the environment you've described. EDIT is
> simple, doesn't require a slew of pre-allocated data sets [who
25 matches
Mail list logo
