>On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:28:48 -0600, Hank Medler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:46:16 -0600, Hank Medler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>->For years, JES2 wouldn't release spool space allocated to a given job
>>>->until all of the job was purged - i.e. freeing SPOOL space
john gilmore wrote:
There is a typo---perhaps a reflection of too much C---here.
| STIMER REAL,BINTVL==5*100
should be
| STIMER REAL,BINTVL=5*100
No, you just read it wrong. The above will assemble, but use the value
of the word at location 500 as a delay. I had
>> S
Dear Member,
I need your help to identify the cause of a problem that has brought me and
my family tremendous trouble and grief. My bank, Wells Fargo, made errors
in the ownership designations on three of our accounts, attributing the
mistakes to a simple, "computer error"--not human error. I a
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:28:48 -0600, Hank Medler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hate to reply to myself, but I was wrong and it appears that the space is
>truly only freed when a SYSOUT is coded as FREE=CLOSE. Sorry, but even
>though it separates the output to another entry, the space is not freed
>wh
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:28:48 -0600, Hank Medler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:46:16 -0600, Hank Medler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>->For years, JES2 wouldn't release spool space allocated to a given job
>>->until all of the job was purged - i.e. freeing SPOOL space seemed
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:46:16 -0600, Hank Medler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>->For years, JES2 wouldn't release spool space allocated to a given job
>->until all of the job was purged - i.e. freeing SPOOL space seemed to be
>->an all-or-nothing proposition. I learned today that JES2 frees up
>->SP
Dirk,
If you let me know what information you need, I'll see about getting the
information for you.
Best regards,
John Maxfield
Lead Developer
BMC Software, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dirk Devos
Sent: Friday, Novemb
-teD wrote:
>I don't think that is an accurate statement for North America.
>Most corporations that are still running Mainframes are running
>with a SYSPLEX.
>Define big shop.
>Here a 4000 MIPS shop is a small one.
It appears to me, little informed, that the benefits of
outsourcing did not reac
->For years, JES2 wouldn't release spool space allocated to a given job
->until all of the job was purged - i.e. freeing SPOOL space seemed to be
->an all-or-nothing proposition. I learned today that JES2 frees up
->SPOOL space for spin-OFF SYSOUT data sets (FREE=CLOSE) as soon as
->they're printe
>You work for big shops. Majority of mainframe
users is not sysplexed.
Probably almost every shop, even monplex use
more than one systems
(that's why we have LPARs).
I don't think that is an accurate statement
for North America. Most corporations that are
still running Mainframes are running
>When are the symbol values determined for a
started task?
When the task starts (actually gets
converted). Remember, a started task always
starts on the same system that it is invoked
on. There are the
submitting/conversion/execution system is
always the same.
(PS: sorry for the previous al
>
-teD
Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archive
Hello:
For years, JES2 wouldn't release spool space allocated to a given job
until all of the job was purged - i.e. freeing SPOOL space seemed to be
an all-or-nothing proposition. I learned today that JES2 frees up
SPOOL space for spin-OFF SYSOUT data sets (FREE=CLOSE) as soon as
they're prin
> Obviously you cannot compile the COBOL program on z/OS.e but ...
... but if you are interested in compiling COBOL (and PL/I and FORTRAN)
programs from a z/OS.e system (legally - we "virtualize" the compile to a
service machine) please check out my client's Web site
http://syspointusa.com.
(Post
/*JOBPARM (and its /* brethren) and JES3's //* cards, are JECL - Job Entry
Control Language. JESn sees and processes these cards before it passes the
stream to JCL conversion. So the symbolic you specified does not exist yet,
because you're not in JCL conversion which means, alas, what seems log
>Are the SYS1.PARMLIB(PROGxx) entries:
>LPA ADD DSNAME(SYS1.MVS.EXITLOAD) MODNAME(...)
>always processed before:
>EXIT ADD EXITNAME(SYS.name) MODNAME(...)
>during z/OS initialization?
All statements in a single parmlib PROGxx parmlib member are processed to
completion in the order they are se
On Nov 25, 2005, at 2:07 AM, R.S. wrote:
-SNIP__
You work for big shops. Majority of mainframe users is not sysplexed.
Probably almost every shop, even monplex use more than one systems
(that's why we have LPARs). Probably many of them have NJE
esta
On Nov 25, 2005, at 1:53 AM, R.S. wrote:
SNIP--
iously (maybe not for IBM) z/OS.e is very interesting mostly for
existing mainframe users, thos fighting for lower TCO. Some of them
decide to change the platform (see
Hi,
I am trying to find out if there is a newsgroup for BMC's Control-M
scheduling package. I am trying to find the layout of the data in a
particular table. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Dirk
--
For IBM-MAI
In a recent note, R.S. said:
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:07:48 +0100
>
> That's because it is forbidden by IBM. I'd prefer "determinate on single
> system *only*". Limited functionality. This is more than I have today.
> Today I have nothing.
>
With similar "more than I have today" motiv
Hello,
we have an application that submits jobs using the VSAM-Interface
(Macros GENCB, MODCB, SHOWCB etc.) to the internal reader and then
obtains the submitted job's id using the ENDREQ-Makro. This all works
fine and we always get a job id when the input stream contains a valid
job and no garbag
There is a typo---perhaps a reflection of too much C---here.
| STIMER REAL,BINTVL==5*100
should be
| STIMER REAL,BINTVL=5*100
In my pedantic fashion I prefer
|&five_secs seta 5*100 --BINTVL unit is 1/100 sec
| STIMER REAL,BINTVL=&five_secs
John Gilmore
A
Hi James,
> Thanks for ur reply.
> But I get a compilation error which states-
> 18 STIMER WAIT,BINTVL=VACATION
> ASMA141E Bad character in operation code - WAIT,BINTVL=VACATION
First, what level of HLASM are you running? Or the operating system release?
Se
"Jerry Ragland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hi James,
>
> Thanks for ur reply.
> But I get a compilation error which states-
> 18 STIMER WAIT,BINTVL=VACATION
> ASMA141E Bad character in operation code - WAIT,BINTVL=VACATION
>Date:Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:19:28 -0700
>From:"William M. Klein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Fw: Running COBOL under z/os.e
FWIW I have modified the CEEPIPI sample program and tested it on z/OS.e.
Obviously you cannot compile the COBOL program on z/OS.e but you can run
the program object.
Hi James,
Thanks for ur reply.
But I get a compilation error which states-
18 STIMER WAIT,BINTVL=VACATION
ASMA141E Bad character in operation code - WAIT,BINTVL=VACATION
Thanks,
Jerry.
--
For
> STIMER WAIT,BINTVL=VACATION
>
> VACATION DCF'500' HUNDRETHS OF SECONDS FOR STIMER (5 SECS)
I prefer longer lasting vacations ;-)
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse - Information Technology
---
Jerry Ragland wrote:
In my assembler program I need to introduce a wait or delay for 5 seconds.
Is there any macro for doing it. I guess there is a WAIT macro but I dont
know how to use it. Is WAIT macro intended for that purpose ? Even when I
introduced the wait macro, I get a compilation error
Jerry,
Take a look in STIMER macro.
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Suporte Técnico - Software Básico Mainframes
Tel: 55 11 4197-2021 Fax: 55 11 4197-2814
>-Mensagem original-
>De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [m
STIMER WAIT,BINTVL=VACATION
VACATION DCF'500' HUNDRETHS OF SECONDS FOR STIMER (5 SECS)
I love the easy ones.
j
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jerry Ragland
S
Hi all,
In my assembler program I need to introduce a wait or delay for 5 seconds.
Is there any macro for doing it. I guess there is a WAIT macro but I dont
know how to use it. Is WAIT macro intended for that purpose ? Even when I
introduced the wait macro, I get a compilation error stating ECBLI
ABDT does not seem to be a CICS transaction abend code, so it can be an ISV
product
or application abend code.
You should post this on the CICS-L list.
Rogerio D. Nascimento
CICS subsystem support
On 11/25/05, Parin Gangar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> There is this abend error code
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:19:28 -0700, William M. Klein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>This certainly is NOT the "intended target" for z/OS.e - but it is clearly
>documented as allowed (both technically and by the license).
>
Does any one have information as to what approximate proportion of
mainframe
Is ABDT all of the error message ? Im not seeing anything for that error
code in 'CICS Transaction Server for z/OS V2.2 CICS Messages and Codes'
-Original Message-
From: Parin Gangar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 3:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CICS A
Hello,
There is this abend error code "ABDT" logged in our Error Logs for CICS
screen abends.
Can anyone help me understand this code?
--
Parin Gangar
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send emai
Hello list,
this looks like a Friday question, but maybe some of you know already
this, or Mark Thomen can shed some light on this. There it goes :
issuing LISTC EN(/) ALL beside a UCAT you get to see all ALIASes being
defined in the MCAT. Issuing the same cmd beside a UCAT whose ALIASes
are SYMBOL
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
(*) I mean: submitted,converted,executed on
the same system. Most of the
installations are monoplexes, probably most
of them do not use NJE for
vast majority of jobs.
I have never worked in a single system shop,
either before or after SYSPLEX, so I have
always
37 matches
Mail list logo
