Paul Schuster wrote:
Hello: I have an ESTAE coded, but discovered it isn't doing its job
correctly. (It is essentially being bypassed.)
So, 1) from a dump, is it possible to tell if an SDWA was being passed to
the ESTAE routine? and 2) is it possible to tell if an FRR got control
instead of my
>You're assuming that you can only run ONE copy of Linux on a CPU.
I'm making no such assumption.
>Since you can run more than one, the net is that it's a lot cheaper to use
>Oracle on Linux on z than on the same horsepower of, say, Intel boxes.
I'm well aware of this.
>More than one site has
Hello: I have an ESTAE coded, but discovered it isn't doing its job
correctly. (It is essentially being bypassed.)
So, 1) from a dump, is it possible to tell if an SDWA was being passed to
the ESTAE routine? and 2) is it possible to tell if an FRR got control
instead of my ESTAE?
(During program
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>>I may be wrong, but I thought Oracle was still a per processor license, even
>>under z/Linux. A dozen Oracles on a zprocessor is cheaper
> than the same on dedicated Intel boxen.
>
> Yes, you are correct.
> But, aside from being accurate, what
Avner, If you have no RDS you do not need to run EDGJSRDS, except when
you are using special keyword EXPDT values in JCL and want those to be
continued to be used under rmm. The dates are extracted in EDGJ5LDR and
merged with any RDS entries in EDGJSRDS.
If you need to handled the special key
>I may be wrong, but I thought Oracle was still a per processor license, even
>under z/Linux. A dozen Oracles on a zprocessor is cheaper
than the same on dedicated Intel boxen.
Yes, you are correct.
But, aside from being accurate, what does this have to do with SAS licensing,
under z/LINUX, whic
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:50:57 -0800, Don Russell wrote:
>
>Note: The PC is not a "user workstation", it's a server that watches
>the directory the FTP process writes to, and then processes the file
>when the size stops changing. (Seems a little hokey to me... but there
>it is)
>
Considerably hokey.
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:50:57 -0800 Don Russell said:
>I'm toying with different ideas of how to send data to an MS Windows
>server from MVS (1.9)
>
>Right now I have "step one" produce a sequential, plain text file on
>DASD, and step 2 uses FTP to send it to the PC, translating ebcdic to
>ascii alon
Hi,
what's new
*$718RS1107
* Implement enhancements contributed by Roland Schiradin RS0908
* Display some System Rexx dataRS0209
* Fixed S0C7 using the TCP/IP client/server display func
1) Who and how did IBM announce these changes to the process so we could
of had this all in place rather than race to get it fixed.
2) We noticed on the website we see RSU is available to download for our
z/OS system but no indication of PUT which we also download. Does anyone
know will it als
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:44:49 -0800, Skip Robinson wrote:
>I'm not sure what Gil means by 'exportable'. There was a period some years
>
ISV's point of view. I was wondering whether BUILDMCS might
be a technique for (re-)packaging a function for distribution
to customers in the field. Clearly, now
I may be wrong, but I thought Oracle was still a per processor
license, even under z/Linux. A dozen Oracles on a zprocessor is cheaper
than the same on dedicated Intel boxen.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State Univsersity
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM
>Because
>1. The pricing scheme would be expected to be "cheaper"
Why? Oracle is not cheaper under z/LINUX.
>2. Therefore many would drop their z/OS (expensive) license
They're already cheaper under UNIX & Windows.
>3. Thus SAS Institute total revenue might suffer.
Might! NOT will.
And, I
Assumptions about the state of uninitialized storage can bite the best
of us. Last year we ran into a problem with the Cobol code generated
by the SQL Coprocessor using Enterprise Cobol 3.3 under DB2 V8.
In the SQL---PLIST it was generating the following FILLER area:
02 SQL---STMT-NUMPIC S9(
I keep BB in my address book, out of respect for the "guru", RIP Bruce!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of R Hey
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Bruce Black passed away
To my re
>Not exactly true. You can charge for LINUX, the question is will anyone pay
>for it. There is nothing in the GPL license that prevents you from making your
>own distribution and charging for it. You just have to supply the source
>code and not prevent anyone from doing whatever they want w
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:50:57 -0800, Don Russell wrote:
>I'm toying with different ideas of how to send data to an MS Windows
>server from MVS (1.9)
>
>Right now I have "step one" produce a sequential, plain text file on
>DASD, and step 2 uses FTP to send it to the PC, translating ebcdic to
>ascii
I know we've talked about this before, but I can't find in my notes how
to simultaneously make output go to SYSOUX and to a file?
I tried going to a file first and copying it, but when the program
Abended, I looked at the file and it was from a previous run.
--
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:57:31 -0500, Mark Jacobs wrote:
>Not exactly true. You can charge for LINUX, the question is will anyone
>pay for it.
True. But we do pay for it. Why? Not for Linux, per se, but for the support.
And the support only comes when you "buy" that vendor's Linux distro.
>There
The PTF for that APAR breaks macro IGWSMF, at least in HDZ1190. We have a PMR
open and fixing APAR has been promised.
Bob
John McKown wrote:
Now this is interesting (to me). APAR OA25205.
PROBLEM SUMMARY:
* USERS AFFECTED:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
So, my question still stands.
Why would SAS Institute not make a profit on z/LINUX SAS?
PS: I'm aware of the terms and conditions of the GPL.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
FWIW...the z/OS R10 Migration book has been recently refreshed and is
available on the z/OS R10 bookshelves. The reason I mention this, is
because we added a migration action for OA27291. There's some good
information in there also, I daresay.
(Here's a link to the BOOK:
http://publibz.boulder.i
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:08:17 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>Now this is interesting (to me). APAR OA25205.
>
>PROBLEM SUMMARY:
>
> * USERS AFFECTED: Users of DFSMS that use PDS or PDSE data *
> * sets that require
An option is use the FTP utility over the EXEC statement; then, after the DDs
definition, (DSN to be transfered, otuput, ReturnCodes, etc) becomes the ftp
sentences to signin,, this step declares the IP, user and password for the
server (whatever of kind) and multiple FTP options
Keep in m
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>> there maybe less money for them.
>>
>
> Why would there be less money?
> You can't charge for LINUX (except maybe support), but you can charge for
> products that run under LINUX.
>
> -
> Too busy driving to stop for gas!
>
>
Not exactly true. You can charge for LINUX
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:34:56 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>>there maybe less money for them.
>
>Why would there be less money?
>You can't charge for LINUX (except maybe support), but you can charge for
>products that run under LINUX.
Yes, you can charge for Linux.
In any case, Ron was talking about S
Hello, all I have a question. I was just looking through the principle
of ops guide on an instruction I had a question on and noticed a BAS
instruction. I started reading about it and noticed that it said we
should use the BAS, BASR type of instructions instead of the BAL and
BALR types. I won't bo
>there maybe less money for them.
Why would there be less money?
You can't charge for LINUX (except maybe support), but you can charge for
products that run under LINUX.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subsc
Been to site and asked question and there list they gave me did not have
z/Linux...so yes..I submitted interest..let's see if
someone...someday---wakes up..
but then---there maybe less money for them Oh---forgot---we'll just
bail them outor give them more money because they had to redesi
Do you think the MAN files will need to be increased in order to support this
PTF?
I like the idea about having an SMF record to go back and see who did what to
whom, but it might put more stress on a busy PDS/PDSE updating system.
Lizette
>
>Now this is interesting (to me). APAR OA25205.
>
>>> On 2/6/2009 at 11:08 AM, Ron Wells wrote:
> anyone know if SAS can run on z/Linux??
> from what I gather SAS only supports it on Intel/amd platform
So far, SAS Institute has declined to put it on the market, although various
beta testers among their customers were very happy with it. As ot
>>anyone know if SAS can run on z/Linux??
>from what I gather SAS only supports it on Intel/amd platform
Why not go to www.sas.com and post this query?
They can answer better than we can.
Also, you could make a formal request to have it supported.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
>I generally agree. However, IIRC, the PL/I compiler did this type of operation
>long ago. >And when somebody would specify large buffers, then the compiler
>would cause a large paging spike due to initializing a couple of
meg(?) of storage to x'00'.
With today's memory-rich environment, is this
>This thread should also reinforce the notion, "If you want it done right, do
>it yourself." IOW, if you want GETMAINed storage to be "clean", then "clean"
>it yourself, every time you GETMAIN.
100% in agreement.
The first programme I wrote (1971 -- High School) was in FORTRAN, and we
learned
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:08:17 -0600, Ron Wells wrote:
>anyone know if SAS can run on z/Linux??
>from what I gather SAS only supports it on Intel/amd platform
>
SAS does not currently run on zLinux. I would encourage all interested
parties to formally contact SAS Support for future R&D planning a
Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
What worries me is the fact that the fix sets default processing to
UseZosV1R9Rules(Yes).
You don't have to do anything to remain in the safe pre-1.10 mode, so
many customers will probably overlook this 1.10 enhancement.
The pre-1.10 mode is not "safe"--just a li
>To single out this one class of error as inexcusable or bad programming is
>absurd.
> That's my opinion.
Of course, you're entitled to your opinion.
But, not initialising is the worst mistake a programmer can make!
The first thing I was taught, in the early 1970's, was always ensure your data
anyone know if SAS can run on z/Linux??
from what I gather SAS only supports it on Intel/amd platform
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privilege
Now this is interesting (to me). APAR OA25205.
PROBLEM SUMMARY:
* USERS AFFECTED: Users of DFSMS that use PDS or PDSE data *
* sets that require an SMF audit trail at *
* the member le
You could also have corrected those records with just SAS,
i.e., MXG not required:
DATA _NULL_;
INFILE SMF;
INPUT @11 SYSTEM $EBCDIC4. @;
IF SYSTEM='1234' THEN SYSTEM='5678';
ELSE ... change system to desired;
FILE SMFOUT DCB=SMF;
PUT _INFILE_ @11 SYSTEM $EBCDIC4. ;
FILE LOG;
This performance issue is what was "fixed" in LE at some point. IBM did
have a well documented option that would make it work like it used to.
Dennis Roach
GHG Corporation
Lockheed Marten Mission Services
FDOC Contract
2100 Space Park Drive
LM-15-4BH
Houston, Texas 77058
Voice: (281) 336-5027
C
Joel,
We had to recall all our objects because our 3995 optical jukebox was
going off support. I set up the CBROAM00 member as follows;
SETOPT MOUNTWAITTIME(60)
SETOSMC MAXRECALLTASKS(5)
STORAGEGROUP(SGROUP00 RECALLOPTICAL(255))
yes ..I try to use subsystem instance group...but I seems doesn't work
properly how comes?/
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Kelman, Tom
wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand. Are you wanting to put a CPU usage cap on
> your CICS regions? I would think that is one are where you definitely
> d
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
>
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:53:03 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
>
>
> >This thread should also reinforce the notion, "If you want it done
> >right, do it yourself." IOW, if you want GETMAINed storage to be
> >
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:53:03 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
>This thread should also reinforce the notion, "If you want it done
>right, do it yourself." IOW, if you want GETMAINed storage to be
>"clean", then "clean" it yourself, every time you GETMAIN.
>
>-jc-
I generally agree. However, IIRC,
I'm not sure I understand. Are you wanting to put a CPU usage cap on
your CICS regions? I would think that is one are where you definitely
don't want to use a cap.
As far as defining the CICS regions to WLM using sub-system instance
group, that is the VTAM APPLID.
Tom Kelman
Enterprise Capacity
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
>
> Guy Gardoit wrote:
> > For the life of me, I can't understand why this is such a surprise
or
> > problem. How many bad programmers were-there/are-there anyway?
> >
> > Sorry, but one who breaks the r
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:02:42 -0700, Roach, Dennis (N-GHG)
wrote:
>I never knew about the 4096 or 8192 rules. I had always been taught that
>the ONLY time storage is cleared is when RSM assigns a real page to a
>virtual page that is not already backed by one in aux storage.
I don't think your "rul
PTF UA45540 is available for OA27386. The Red Alert was especially noteworthy
for anyone running Top-Secret or ACF2.
http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA27386
http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/set2/sas/f/redAlerts/20081215.html
Partial Release of VSAM Extended Format Data set
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Tom Marchant wrote:
..snip
> To single out this one
> class of error as inexcusable or bad programming is absurd.
>
> That's my opinion.
>
> ..snip
It's absurd to RTFM before you code a macro? Any ISV product that has this
problem would make me wonder about what
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:41:41 -0800 Edward Jaffe
wrote:
:>Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:>> I wonder if VSM is smart enough to recognize that a paged out page is all
zero
:>> and to just mark it as not assigned yet so that a page fault will not
require
:>> a page in.
:>I seriously doubt VSM is the leas
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:01:37 EST "(IBM Mainframe Discussion List)"
wrote:
:>In a message dated 2/5/2009 12:04:24 P.M. Central Standard Time,
:>dennis.ro...@lmco.com writes:
:>>I had always been taught that
:>the ONLY time storage is cleared is when RSM assigns a real page to a
:>virtual page th
52 matches
Mail list logo
