We tried to connect a remote user using Terminal server 2003/X32 with PCOM
5.7 and it worked fine. We encountered some error messages while trying the
same under Terminal Server 2008/X64:
The PDLC Mapper service depends on the PDLC X.25 service which failed to
start because of the following error
When ISPF fails to initialize just create a new dataset by entering the
following in the TMP READY PROMPT:
Alloc f(ISPPROF) da('your dsname') new catalog like(sys1.parmlib) /8 or any
other model dataset you can access with DCB/80/3120/fb
Itschak
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Joel C Ewing
At 15:58 -0400 on 07/13/2009, Bill Fairchild wrote about Re: AMBLIST Funny:
In the early 1970s I had a taste of the humor of the HASP
development team when I saw their description of a problem in
RETAIN. HASP, which ran on OS/360 in key 0 and could overlay any
byte in central storage, had bee
Having been there, these kinds of problems are more likely to hit you on
a DR test, when you deliberately take only a subset of vaulted data to
DR and don't have full access to ML2 data; especially when someone tries
to fire up a personal TSO session that doesn't normally run during a DR
test.
Urgent is non-descriptive.
John's answer is how to continue, not how to access the dataset. You
can't access the existing dataset, you don't have it available at you DR
test. (I hope it's a test :)
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
> -Original Messa
Ron,
But that is where your Tape Management System can come into play. All the
Tape Management Systems have some type of "rules" (CA-1 calls it the RDS; CA
TLMS calls it the RMF; and DFSMSrmm calls it Vital Records) that allow you
to specify a retention rule or expiration date for tape files based
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Jacky Bright wrote:
> My DBA has forgot to recall the SYSADM ISPF profile dataset from the VTS.
> Now at DR site entry is there in ML2 which we can not access.
>
> Looking for a way how to access this dataset. Any ideas.
>
> JAcky
>
Do a DELETE ... NOSCRATCH
However, for
My DBA has forgot to recall the SYSADM ISPF profile dataset from the VTS.
Now at DR site entry is there in ML2 which we can not access.
Looking for a way how to access this dataset. Any ideas.
JAcky
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / s
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Ron Wells wrote:
> JRIO is for use under USS only ??
>
It can be used in any Java environment under z/OS. I.e. it won't work on
Linux, AIX, Windows, Solaris, etc.
I don't know if that is what you are getting at or not.
--
Trying to write with a pencil that is dull is poi
The Java JVM requires USS in that the address space must be "dubbed"
for Unix - but this could be in a batch address space, a STC, CICS,
IMS, .
What you probably want to know is whether jrio.jar and its native
library (both part of the SDK) can be used only if the Java VM is
started with the "
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:03:19 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
wrote:
. . .
>(From ancient experience and fading memory):
>
>Even before SMS existed, DS1LSTAR was set to beginning-of-file
>(Allocation wouldn't just leave the field uninitialized, would it?)
>QSAM correctly reported EOF on the first read. B
JRIO is for use under USS only ??
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
only for the use of
Is any one out there aware of a product(s) for the mainframe that would
accomplish a generic file validation given a set of rules on a dataset.
For example has a header, has a trailer, record counts, content
validation(field should have only these values), record type sequencing, etc.
Thanks
Mi
X'01' is write without spacing for RECFM=FM.
What is SYSPRINT declared as?
Been a long time since I used STEAM I/O :)
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Adam Johanson wrote:
>> If the fields are 36 characters, why are 37 being displayed?
>
> Must just be how PL/I does it with the PUT SKIP LIST
Guy Gardoit schrieb:
Hmmm. Makes me wonder if in Unix there is an "recycle bin" equivalent for
the "rm" command.
no. KDE, GNOME, XFCE and so on have a recycle bin implemented, wich only
works if files are "deleted" with the filemanager of the desktop
environment (--> KDE, GNOME, etc).
But th
On 13 Jul 2009 12:06:02 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>Guy Gardoit wrote:
>> IBM is probably working on an aquisition plan - everyone has their price -
>> IBM just needs to complete the math.
>>
>
>It's entirely possible that some non-IBM entities have known for years
>how to redi
-Original Message-
I had something to do with that. My concern is that system
programs are usually reading that book at a time when they are
dealing with the gravity of some problem, and may not be in a mood
to appreciate its opposite, levity.
And we all know how humorless those "
In the early 1970s I had a taste of the humor of the HASP development team when
I saw their description of a problem in RETAIN. HASP, which ran on OS/360 in
key 0 and could overlay any byte in central storage, had been guilty of
"spraying bits at random". And in 1969 I saw Tom Simpson, the chi
>I had something to do with that. My concern is that system programs are
>usually reading that book at a time when they are dealing with the gravity of
>some problem, and may not be in a mood to appreciate its opposite, levity.
Too bad!
I see your point, but sometimes levity is the only way to
> I had something to do with that.
Grinch ;-)
Bob Shannon
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://
Subject: Re: Healther checker documentation
From: Jim Mulder
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 14:42:22 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
05/16/2008
12:46:13 AM:
> I was going to say "obviously you haven't read the Diagnosi
Guy Gardoit wrote:
IBM is probably working on an aquisition plan - everyone has their price -
IBM just needs to complete the math.
It's entirely possible that some non-IBM entities have known for years
how to redirect arbitrary third-party code to zAAP/zIIP. (Hacking the
"secret" is not Ro
In a message dated 7/13/2009 12:14:14 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
yak36...@yahoo.com writes:
rather is just probing to see if the ftp server is listening, and quickly
disconnecting before the server does the getpeername.
>>
There's lots of DoS attacks going around too. I'd run it by the
IBM is probably working on an aquisition plan - everyone has their price -
IBM just needs to complete the math.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
> Original URL:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/08/neon_zprime_mainframe/Neon revs
> cost-cutting mainframewarezPrime risks Big
I think you will find it in the MVS Diagnostic Tools and Services Aids
GA22-7589-12
Lizette
>
>When did this get removed from the Service Aids manual? QuickRef still has
>it documented.
>
>http://tinyurl.com/n8rxl2
>
>
--
For
When did this get removed from the Service Aids manual? QuickRef still has
it documented.
http://tinyurl.com/n8rxl2
Regards,
John K
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:49:15 -0700, Guy Gardoit wrote:
>Hmmm. Makes me wonder if in Unix there is an "recycle bin" equivalent for
>the "rm" command.
>
mv -i some-file ~/.Trash/. # (OS X)
o You _could_ alias "rm" to that.
o I _hate_ when admins do that in .profile.comon
o Be careful when:
-
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Guy Gardoit
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 12:49 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Any product to undelete file?
>
> Hmmm. Makes me wonder if in Unix there is an "recycle bin
Hmmm. Makes me wonder if in Unix there is an "recycle bin" equivalent for
the "rm" command.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Edward Jaffe
wrote:
>
>
>
> I like (and use) the UNDO editor command from time to time. I like (and
> use) the Trash folder in Windows from time to time. I like (and use)
You can use the ISPF LMMDEL service with parameter MEMBER(*).
ISPF can be invoked from within a batch job.
Michel Castelein
z/OS instructor & consultant
http://www.geocities.com/michelcastelein/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signo
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Godfrey
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 12:14 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: ftp message that I don't really understand.
>
> Just a guess, but maybe the client is not t
Just a guess, but maybe the client is not trying to start an ftp session, but
rather is just probing to see if the ftp server is listening, and quickly
disconnecting before the server does the getpeername.
Bill
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:43:43 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
>I've been seeing a LOT of
On Monday 13 July 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
> Bob,
> I've made all the changes and the compiles goes through with no
> issues using gmake.
> The compile loops for some reason using "make -f mvs.mki" (but than
> its documented to use "gmake") ;)
Yes, I think the part of Lutz' patch that I left
Could you use the ACS routines to set the TAPE to a different retention period
and leave the dasd part alone?
I am sure you can use
IF ((&DSN = db2_log_dsn ) & (&UNIT=TAPE) ) then MGMTCLAS= to do something
like that. Do you have a storage admin person you can ask?
Lizette
>
>>>For some re
Bob,
I've made all the changes and the compiles goes through with no issues
using gmake.
The compile loops for some reason using "make -f mvs.mki" (but than its
documented to use "gmake") ;)
Ran some tests on files > 2GB and it worked wonderfully. Even got good
performance for the zip - for me, eq
Dual logging is a belt and suspenders operation. If the suspenders are
not needed more than the first day, it would be a question for IBM DB2
on how to make it happen without outside intervention.
Are there so many tapes tied up that 4 days is a problem?
Dennis Roach
GHG Corporation
Lockheed Mart
>>For some reason, the tape(s) on which these datasets reside have an
>>expiration date of 4 days. The owner of these datasets does not want to
>>change that, but he does want the day old datasets deleted.
>>
>Why should you have to go and manually (or automatically) delete tapes
after >one day,
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:30:48 +0200, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
>> >
>> > From the z/OS V1.11 Preview,
>> >
>> >"In z/OS V1.11, DFSMSdfp processing is planned to be changed to indicate
>> >end-of-file (EOF) during the allocation of data sets on DASD that are not
>> >SMS-managed and have either sequ
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
>
> Chris Craddock wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > Folks hate to hear me say it, but just about everything we "know"
about IT
> > today is wrong. We're never going back to the home grown development
cottag
I ran some additional tests:
F CATALOG,REPORT,CACHE shows that VLF caches date even with LLA down.
LLA with NOFREEZE always returns the actual member.
I'll do some further tests with LLA down and VLFDATA RETRIEVE.
Jochen
--
For
NOMAIL
Vanguard Audit & Compliance Solutions. Ease the Enterprise Audit and Compliance
Burden. Find it, Fix it, Lock it Down™. For more information visit:
www.go2vanguard.com
This e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the
addressee and may contain information that is PRI
Thnx, helped a lot.
Regards,
Jochen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-
I've been seeing a LOT of messages like the following. I don't understand what
is going on.
Jul 13 09:23:48 LIH1/BPXROOT FTPD9 ftpd[1142]: EZYFS50I ID=FTPD140453 CONN
starts Client IPaddr=10.170.52.4 hostname=UNKNOWN
Jul 13 09:23:49 LIH1/BPXROOT FTPD9 ftps[1142]: EZYFS51I ID=FTPD140453 CONN
f
On 12 Jul 2009 11:39:56 -0700, bshan...@rocketsoftware.com (Bob
Shannon) wrote:
>Well, what I know is that when companies built their own applications, they
>talked about
>gaining a competitive advantage. When's the last time anyone heard that?
>When companies built their own applications, they
Chris, sorry to be so ambiguous. What I'm trying to do is get rid of
some old IBM equipment at remote locations. It is being replaced by
Windows Communications Server and LANDP. The reason I ask about SNA
Gateway, etc.. is that in configuring the Windows Comm Server the Wizard
has a dropdown window
On 12 Jul 2009 14:00:07 -0700, patrick.oke...@wamu.net (Patrick
O'Keefe) wrote:
>That is probably the inevitable future, but the time frame is not at all
>clear, and the ecomonic break-even line between "do it in-house" and
>"buy it" changes over time. When you pass development and
>maintenance
> If the fields are 36 characters, why are 37 being displayed?
Must just be how PL/I does it with the PUT SKIP LIST. I just ran a hello
world program with no spaces at the end, but it printed out an additional one.
A previous poster asked me put post all relevant delcarations, assignment
Sent from my Dick Tracy Two-Way Wrist Radio.
Nanny Nanny Boo Boo!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Johnson, Larry W.
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 12:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Jul 2009
Well, I did not know about that command option!
Easy as that - did the job.
Many thanks, Norbert!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Norbert Friemel
Sent: 13 July 2009 10:52
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: non-SMS data
"Bri P" wrote in message
news:<20090713103535.ls0uw.424049.r...@web03-winn.ispmail.private.ntl.co
m>...
> Hi folks
>
> I'm sure I can't be the first to ask this, but I have unsuccessfully
searched the archives for an answer.. (Maybe I can't get the right
search arguments)
>
> Somehow, I've man
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:35:35 +0100, Bri P wrote:
>Somehow, I've managed to end up with several hundred non-SMS-managed
datasets on some SMS-managed volumes. I do want them to be SMS-managed;
others (more recent ones) are, and the ACS routines etc are in place for them.
>
>How do I (as painlessly a
Hi folks
I'm sure I can't be the first to ask this, but I have unsuccessfully searched
the archives for an answer.. (Maybe I can't get the right search arguments)
Somehow, I've managed to end up with several hundred non-SMS-managed datasets
on some SMS-managed volumes. I do want them to be SMS-
Thank you Bob for this.
I will test this out today & let you know if it works for me.
Thanks again,
Vikesh
Please Note: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice
which can be viewed at http://www.sars.gov.za/Email_Disclaimer.pdf
-
"Paul Gilmartin" wrote in message
news:...
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:51:10 -0400, Bob Rutledge wrote:
> >
> > From the z/OS V1.11 Preview,
> >
> >"In z/OS V1.11, DFSMSdfp processing is planned to be changed to
indicate
> >end-of-file (EOF) during the allocation of data sets on DASD that are
not
>
54 matches
Mail list logo
