Edward Jaffe pisze:
R.S. wrote:
It is also worth to mention that IBM is the only company which is not
try to "catch" the customer. I read several horror stories on this
forum, on ISVcosts list, from own experience - almost any other
company presents license agreements that HAVE to be negotiate
To answer your question directly, here are a couple options besides CICS
Backup While Open (BWO):
IBM CICS VSAM Copy (5655-L66)
This product is withdrawn from marketing but still supported. You can
inquire with IBM to see if it's still relevant or if IBM has some
alternative recommendations.
http:
>> Your statements are unfair, inaccurate, subjective opinion presented as
>> fact, and ought to be recanted...
>Totally agree!!!
I'm a customer AND I totally agree, as well!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
> Sent: Monday, 14 September 2009 7:06 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Sub Capacity Reporting for non IBM Vendors
>
> R.S. wrote:
> > It is also worth to mentio
> It is also worth to mention that IBM is the only company which is not
> try to "catch" the customer.
BS! Which planet are you from?
>I read several horror stories on this
> forum, on ISVcosts list, from own experience - almost any other
> company presents license agreements that HAVE to be n
R.S. wrote:
It is also worth to mention that IBM is the only company which is not
try to "catch" the customer. I read several horror stories on this
forum, on ISVcosts list, from own experience - almost any other
company presents license agreements that HAVE to be negotiated. Only
IBM's licens
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:07:36 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>...
>In the days of NCCF - and I think NOSP before it - and the first
>release of NetView, a semi-automation capability existed after the
>clist language was introduced. I describe it as "semi-automation"
>in that the operator had to keep
I think this is where I will tell you I will know in a month or two... We are
installing a V-max with GDDR in a star configuration We have done it 2
other times within our environment, this is the first V-MAX and the newest EMC
software mainframe enabler V7... And I wonder about the prev
--- On Thu, 9/10/09, Lizette Koehler wrote:
From: Lizette Koehler
Subject: Re: CLIST/REXX Library Formats
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009, 4:09 PM
I think the Lrecl80 came from the punch card days. The people I worked with
back in 1980 preferred the 80 byte record
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Ward, Mike S wrote:
> Hello all, I am looking for a product that would allow us to copy a VSAM
> dataset both ksds and esds to another file and copy all the records in
> the file while the file is still open to CICS. I have looked at the CICS
> BWO option and I do
Edward Jaffe pisze:
[...]
Such tactics do not work with IBM. Reagan's "Trust but Verify" applies.
They have an elaborate (almost Rube Goldberg-like) system in place to
monitor and report usage.
Yes and no. IBM is one of very few companies which do not use execution
keys. I don't know any IBM
In a message dated 9/12/2009 11:18:49 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
ibmm...@intergate.com writes:
I suspect you clicked on the link which got split
onto two lines. Try his tinyurl or this one (in which I
attempt to unsplit his):
>http://www.share.org/Volunteers/ProgramsandProjects/MVSProgr
12 matches
Mail list logo
