On 11/20/2009 10:28 PM, Sam Siegel wrote:
> This is exactly what I've recently done and it works perfect on 1.09
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Donald Russell wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:34, Tim Hare
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In a 2008 thread on people using IEFBR14 to do deletes there a
>>Is it possible to isolate one LPAR in a CEC and set the date/time to a
>>different value than the other LPARs in the same CEC?
>Yes. This has been possible since the 9672 G5 (I think... could
>have been prior). This was needed for Y2K testing. Of course
>you have to have your CLOCKxx member
http://www.planetmvs.com/unxmit/index.html
http://www.planetmvs.com
Dave Alcock's excellent site includes a useful page of various
information about XMIT compiled in one place.
Thanks, Sam
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:24, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:54:32 -0800, Donald Russell wrote:
> >
> I have now done this. The data set was recalled, with SYSLOG messages
> including:
>
> 11:13:07.26 STC05950 0090 *TMS009 IEC501A M
> D413,665560,SL,,PRODHSM,H,UOP.H
> 11:13
Donald Russell wrote:
//S1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//FILE1 DD DSN=...,DISP=(OLD,DELETE),UNIT=(,,DEFER)
I believe this will delete a migrated dataset without recalling it, because
IIRC the DEFER option on UNIT says, don't allocate a device for this until
the dataset is opened... since IEFBR14 doesn't op
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com (Edward Jaffe) writes:
> In his System z keynote address at SHARE in Austin, Karl Freund
> described a hypothetical future machine in wh
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:54:32 -0800, Donald Russell wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:08, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>
>> I suspect this doesn't work as you wish for a couple reasons:
>>
>> o Verifiably, on 1.10. I migrated a data set, then ran the job step:
>>
>> //STEP EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
>>
Edward Jaffe pisze:
There are conceptually similarities. But, "blades" are usually
fully-functional, complex computers with their own operating systems. I
don't believe that's true of crypto cards.
I found excellent description of PCIXCC card part of some IBM Magazine
AFAIK). For my understan
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:08, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:25:38 -0700, Sam Siegel wrote:
>
> >This is exactly what I've recently done and it works perfect on 1.09
> >
> How did you verify that the data set was not recalled before it
> was deleted.
>
> >On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:47:40 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
In his System z keynote address at SHARE in Austin, Karl Freund
described a hypothetical future machine in which non-z processor
"blades", mounted within the System z frame, would be available as
"accelerators" to a
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:47:40 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
>
>In his System z keynote address at SHARE in Austin, Karl Freund
>described a hypothetical future machine in which non-z processor
>"blades", mounted within the System z frame, would be available as
>"accelerators" to applications running on
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:25:38 -0700, Sam Siegel wrote:
>This is exactly what I've recently done and it works perfect on 1.09
>
How did you verify that the data set was not recalled before it
was deleted.
>On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Donald Russell wrote:
>
>> //S1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
>> //FILE1
P S wrote:
As for CBE, IBM was talking up Haplon and CBE on z a while ago, but that
seems to have died down. Interesting.
In his System z keynote address at SHARE in Austin, Karl Freund
described a hypothetical future machine in which non-z processor
"blades", mounted within the System z f
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Jim Elliott, IBM wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:15:59 -0500, Gerhard Postpischil <
> gerh...@valley.net>
> wrote:
>
> >If they were running on 3081s, that would be a big innovation.
> >Last I heard they were still on 2050s (stripped down 360/50s).
> >
> >Gerhard P
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:15:59 -0500, Gerhard Postpischil
wrote:
>If they were running on 3081s, that would be a big innovation.
>Last I heard they were still on 2050s (stripped down 360/50s).
>
>Gerhard Postpischil
>Bradford, VT
>
The 9020 (not 2050) was made up of modified 360-65 and 360-50 syste
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
> The "specialty engine" part is just so much marketing hype. As has
> been discussed endlessly here, the current specialty engines are the
> very same engines as all the others, but with different legal Ts & Cs
> that make it impossible to ru
The replication code was changed. No resources shortage, no delay of the
real disk during the processing of the replication, and almost no overhead
using the replication. November 20, 2009.
Shai
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sig
Bill,
Another way I could think of is to stop the MQ VIPA (Virtual IP address)
while CICS goes down and start it when CICS comes up and fully
functional. It can be done by automation package.
The following needs to be taken care
a) need to have VIPA for each CICS region in cases where one MQ
sub
I think the simplest answer to the question is that you can use the NIO
random access file methods to read or write any file using 64 bit XRBA
addressing with any length you want. Once you have read a block of data
from a file such as an SMF record you can wrap the block in a buffer and then
u
I am out of the office until 11/30/2009.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "IBM-MAIN Digest - 19
Nov 2009 to 20 Nov 2009 (#2009-324)" sent on 11/21/09 0:00:04.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is aw
Hi Jim,
As I wrote to you in other post SmartDCI from PKS replaces the ADABAS stub
module with one of its own and is able to direct adabas calls to DB2/Oracle
on almost any platform. It does involves any code change.
ITschak
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On 11/20/20
Hi Jim,
Don't know about SAG, but PKS (http://www,pks.de) has a product that does
that that supports DB2 & Oracle on many platforms, including Z/OS. I believe
that SAG prices are always charge more.
Itschak
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Jim Marshall wrote:
> Today we run ADABAS with Natura
22 matches
Mail list logo
