On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:54:32 -0800, Donald Russell wrote: >On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:08, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> >> I suspect this doesn't work as you wish for a couple reasons: >> >> o Verifiably, on 1.10. I migrated a data set, then ran the job step: >> >> //STEP EXEC PGM=IEFBR14 >> //D DD DISP=OLD,UNIT=(,,DEFER), >> // DSN=&SYSUID... >> >> The data set was recalled. Even a better test: We have a test >> system on which HSM is not enabled. There, I submitted the >> job with DISP=(OLD,DELETE),UNIT=(,,DEFER). There, it hung on WTOR: >> >> ARC0050A DFSMSHSM IS NOT ACTIVE - START DFSMSHSM >> >> o Suspected; not verifiable. Delete processing in allocation may >> require that the data set reside on a real volume, not merely be >> defined in the MCDS. >> >> > >I suspect your "better test" isn't very conclusive: >Because there's a WTOR saying to start HSM doesn't mean the data set is >going to be recalled. I would expect HSM must be running in order to delete >a migrated dataset... HSM has to be told at some level to delete it. > Oops. You're right. I forgot to consider that.
>Your first test I assume you see messages in the job log about the dataset >being recalled? >Does it make a difference if the dataset is migrated to second level or not? > >I don't know which messages you saw that lead you to believe is was >recalled. > >I think a conclusive test would be ... >A - migrate a dataset >B - IEFBR14 DISP=OLD,UNIT=(,,DEFER) If you read carefully the quoted material you will see that I performed this test. >C - Is dataset recalled or not? > If you read carefully the quoted material you will see that I reported the data set was recalled. >Repeat with step A being "migrate to second level" (just for fun) > I have now done this. The data set was recalled, with SYSLOG messages including: 11:13:07.26 STC05950 00000090 *TMS009 IEC501A M D413,665560,SL,,PRODHSM,H,UOP.H 11:13:07.25 STC05950 00080094 *IEC501A M D413,665560,SL,,PRODHSM,H,UOP.HMIGTAPE. >I doubt very much the DISP parm matters, either the dataset will be recalled >or it won't, based on the DEFER option. > My observations contradict your blind guess: it appears to me that the data set is recalled regardless of the DEFER option. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
