> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 10:42 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: dead zone
>
> Steve Samson writes:
> >> The "bar" is a thick one, from 2g to 4g, "sacri
One thing that, IMO, is keeping JCL in business is shear inertia. Too many
times I've had people, especially programmers, resist doing any "unnecessary"
clean up of JCL. IMO, all COND processing should be done with the new
IF/ELSE/ENDIF construct. But I can't even get them to write new JCL using
>I'm still intrigued that the (undocumented) option's name
>contains the substring "32G".
Use2GTo32G: "Satisfy this request for n 1M segments using storage in the
range 2G to 32G."
>At some release 64-bit LE moved the CAA and other control blocks from
>starting at 4G to 32G.
I suspect this is
It's a bit like being a beer company. We just don't have the budget for
mainframes. It's considered secondarily at best. One of the things on my
list is to create a quality backup system. I have to minimize DASD usage so
that I can find a backup solution that doesn't cost a fortune. That was (and
s
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:31:44 -0600, David Logan
wrote:
>Since it is a development box, there hasn't been a lot of time given to
>it.
IMHO, development is just as well a customer of systems as any other user...
So why not give them the attention they deserve?
Jantje.
-
The code I am writing is a prototype, but it is intended that something
like it will be shipped to customers in time.
I don't know that PDSE usage will be an issue to anyone, but experiece
suggests that someone will at least question the requirement, so for the
time being I'm avoiding using a PDSE
Steve Austin wrote:
Thanks
I should have explained that I'm using the pre-linker so that I can link
to a PDS.
Out of curiosity why are you tied to a PDS? You will get much better
mileage from a PDSE. GOFF, XPLINK, programs > 16MB and future features
that will only be supported by PDSE progr
Thanks
I should have explained that I'm using the pre-linker so that I can link
to a PDS.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of David Crayford
Sent: 25 December 2009 00:48
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Assembler
Hello Dave,
I was hoping the pre-linker would resolve the long names I specified on
the call to the 8 byte upper case names to which it renames the target
routines, but it does not. To get around this I am using CHANGE
statements in the linkedit step.
I'm doing this in order to link the program i
101 - 109 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
