Re: ALTER of open VSAM cluster

2010-07-31 Thread Ron Hawkins
All, It seems we have several versions of how Freespace operates in a KSDS. I recall that FreeSpace was maintained when records are inserted at the end of file, but not SIS. I found the following reference at "http://www.slideshare.net/danjodea/basic-vsam."; "When records are inserted be

Re: History of Hard-coded Offsets (Was: TSSO problems)

2010-07-31 Thread John McKown
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 10:36 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote: > Long ago, before the advent of SMS, IBM made a commitment to not change > device geometry after the 3390 was introduced. I, for one, salute IBM > for living up to that commitment. > > Rick In many ways, I agree with that sentiment. Howe

Re: remove() of PDSE member leaves PDS locked

2010-07-31 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:20:51 -0400 Gerhard Postpischil wrote: :>On 7/29/2010 7:08 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: :>> There is very little difference (from the programmers view) between BSAM and :>> BPAM. QSAM and BSAM, on the other hand, are quite different. :>I guess it depends on your definition o

Re: History of Hard-coded Offsets (Was: TSSO problems)

2010-07-31 Thread Rick Fochtman
--- But this reminds me of the current struggle to extend DASD volume sizes beyond 54GB, largely because IBM apparently at the introduction of the 3390 made a committment to support forever programmers with the unconscionab

Re: Dynalloc error: 037C006E (spool data set browse)

2010-07-31 Thread John McKown
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 08:18 -0500, Eric Bielefeld wrote: > What is the new JEW Spool data set browse? Is that a new command, or a > vendor product? I've never heard of it before or remember it mentioned on > this list. > > Eric Bielefeld > Sr. Systems Programmer > http://publibz.boulder.ibm.

Re: Dynalloc error: 037C006E (spool data set browse)

2010-07-31 Thread Eric Bielefeld
What is the new JEW Spool data set browse? Is that a new command, or a vendor product? I've never heard of it before or remember it mentioned on this list. Eric Bielefeld Sr. Systems Programmer - Original Message - From: "Monika Amiss" Dear group, i'm making some tests with t

Re: History of Hard-coded Offsets (Was: TSSO problems)

2010-07-31 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2010-07-31 00:30, Paul Gilmartin pisze: On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:01:09 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote: I've seen other "old" programs with many hard-coded offsets and lengths and always wondered why this was such common practice back then. Was it because there were a lot of inexperienced assem

AW: Dynalloc error: 037C006E (spool data set browse)

2010-07-31 Thread Monika Amiss
>It looks like your ALTXTPRE includes a length field. Since IAZBTOKP includes >the length of each subparameter, it should not follow >ALTXTPRE but, rather, >overlay the last two bytes of ALTXTPRE. So, >ALTXTU3 DSXL(ALTXTPRE) >TU0002TK DSCL(BTOKSIZE) >should be

Re: AW: Dynalloc error: 037C006E (spool data set browse)

2010-07-31 Thread J R
It looks like your ALTXTPRE includes a length field. Since IAZBTOKP includes the length of each subparameter, it should not follow ALTXTPRE but, rather, overlay the last two bytes of ALTXTPRE. So, ALTXTU3 DSXL(ALTXTPRE) TU0002TK DSCL(BTOKSIZE) should be ALTXT

Re: AW: Dynalloc error: 037C006E (spool data set browse)

2010-07-31 Thread J R
The FM (z/OS V1R12.0 MVS Authorized Assembler Services Guide) confirms TUNUM=7. Did you ensure that BTOKLSDL=0? > Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:13:59 -0400 > From: jayare...@hotmail.com > Subject: Re: AW: Dynalloc error: 037C006E (spool data set browse) > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > > There is s

Re: AW: Dynalloc error: 037C006E (spool data set browse)

2010-07-31 Thread J R
There is some confusion regarding the browse token. Is it a single token that just happens to have seven subparameters (TUNUM=1) or is it seven distinct subparameters that need to be reflected in TUNUM (TUNUM=7)? There is a SHARE presentation http://ew.share.org/client_files/callpapers/attac

AW: Dynalloc error: 037C006E (spool data set browse)

2010-07-31 Thread Monika Amiss
On 7/31/2010 1:09 AM, Monika Amiss wrote: > MVC U3.S99TUKEY,=AL2(DALBRTKN) > MVC U3.S99TUNUM,=AL2(7) > MVC U3.S99TULNG,=AL2(L'TU0002TK) > Any hint appreciated. Have a nice day. > You're misreading the message. Note that you stuff a 7 into TUNUM, which is > the