Hi Folks,
CBT Tape Version 480 is now the current version release of the CBT
MVS Utilities Tape collection of free MVS software. The "CBT" page of
the www.cbttape.org website has been mostly updated, as of this
writing. A few things have not yet been done, such as the DFDSS and FDR
back
At 00:07 -0500 on 01/18/2011, zMan wrote about Re: EMail attachments
stopped working:
No, DATA is the end of the envelope. SMTP doesn't know from MIME: it
just knows envelope and body. MIME is content only, interpreted by the
MUA, not the MTA. MIME is a red herring here.
What I was saying is
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:07:04 -0500, zMan wrote:
>No, DATA is the end of the envelope. SMTP doesn't know from MIME: it
>just knows envelope and body. MIME is content only, interpreted by the
>MUA, not the MTA. MIME is a red herring here.
>
Time was. But nowadays I suspect there are busybody MTAs t
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:11:02 -0600, Henrique Seganfredo wrote:
>
>Where can I find a sample of compile and link commands for a ICSF-aware app
>to run under OMVS?
>
There's a Rexx example in 'SYS1.SAMPLIB(CSFTEST)' IIRC. Rexx,
but the interface it uses is "address LINKPGM", which is equivalent
to C
No, DATA is the end of the envelope. SMTP doesn't know from MIME: it
just knows envelope and body. MIME is content only, interpreted by the
MUA, not the MTA. MIME is a red herring here.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
> At 18:00 -0800 on 01/17/2011, John Mattson wrote
Hello,
Where can I find a sample of compile and link commands for a ICSF-aware app
to run under OMVS?
Regards,
Henrique Seganfredo
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama
At 18:00 -0800 on 01/17/2011, John Mattson wrote about EMail
attachments stopped working:
So, our first PS 80 dataset contains something like this...
HELO EAI1.EPSON.COM
MAIL FROM:
RCPT TO:
DATA
FROM: rn_c...@ea.epson.com
TO:edwin_bern...@ea.epson.com
SUBJECT: (TEST) Sku Download Exception
No, sorry -- postmaster is where bounced notes go. Maybe they're
supposed to be returned: is a "bad" note returnable? *SHOULD* the
"bad" notes be going -- that is, do they look legitimate? I was
assuming that they were somehow known to be invalid (typo in address,
or other problem).
Trying to grok
On 01/17/2011 08:59 PM, John Mattson wrote:
> "I need somebody."
>
>
Don't we all...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Sea
At 04:12 + on 01/10/2011, john gilmore wrote about Re: Date
representations: Y2k revisited:
Robert A Rosenberg writes:
It is not as simple as that since you have to allow for calenders
getting out of sync. When the Julian calender was replaced by the
regorian one, there were (depending
Trying to give you a sensible answer here. "Bad" notes are ones which are
not sent, and stop SMTP from sending others which would normally be
"good". Assuming our "g2" server is the "Postmaster" you refer to (it
is the gateway to Notes), then according to the Notes admin, it is not
giving a
SWAGs:
So what makes that a "bad" note? Do you know? What's it supposed to do
with a "bad" note? Did POSTMASTER (or equivalent) go away?
MIME is content-related, doesn't (shouldn't) have anything to do with SMTP.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:00 PM, John Mattson wrote:
> zOS 1.08 (yes, I have 1.11
zOS 1.08 (yes, I have 1.11 ready to go as soon as I get management OK).
Please be gentle, TCPIP is not my strength.
Early 2011-Jan eMails creating attachments using Mime stopped working.
What we do is fairly simple, create three FB 80 PS datasets, one with the
addressing & mime info, One with
"I need somebody."
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> From: rob.schr...@gmail.com
> I have a client that uses Simplist ... it is pretty cool... especially
> driving everything from ISPF.
I don't know who your client is but I'm glad they like the file transfer
feature. The ability to easily transfer files by selecting them from any
regular membe
don't know what you're trying to do with it, but for transport purposes, I run
a utility on the mainframe to make a flatfile then xmit as text. no corruption
when sent back to the mainframe if receiving file is pre-allocated with correct
LRECL & RECFM. IEBUPDTE (or is it IEBCOPY?) or SAS Proc
I have a client that uses Simplist ... it is pretty cool... especially
driving everything from ISPF.
-Rob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message
Use nmap. e.g.
prompt
case
nmap $1 $1.txt
mget *
Do the opposite for uploading. i.e.
nmap $1.$2 $1
Craig Pace wrote:
>
> I agree with the XMIT only because of file space that is saved; however,
> you can download it a empty directory on your PC with the FTP MGET option
> and then run a batch
WSA.EXE doesn't require a second step to rename the downloaded files. Simply
enter the target directory in ISPF option 3.7.2 (e.g. enter C:\MyDir\*.txt) and
enter the PDS name (e.g. 'MY.PDS') and then select some or all of the members
from the displayed member list. For example, to select all me
I agree with the XMIT only because of file space that is saved; however,
you can download it a empty directory on your PC with the FTP MGET option
and then run a batch program (anything.BAT) that simply does a RENAME
x:\path\* x:\path\*.txt and it will rename all files to have the .txt
extentio
> When do you plan to install the new z10? We plan to have the Customized
> Offerings Driver available on DVD next month. If you need to put the
> z10 in before that, have the IBM account team contact me directly and I
> will put them in touch with the people who are supporting an interim
> DVD-b
Willie,
Unfortunately, mget doesn't work like that... you can specify multiple
filenames and use the file* .. but cannot change the name on the mget. I
have to agree with the other poster about using XMI for the whole PDS.
But in this case, once you are done with the mget, you should be able t
- Original Message -
From: "willie bunter"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 1:39 PM
Subject: DOWNLOADING PDS FROM MAINFRAME TO PC
Hallo All,
It has been a long while since I downloaded a PDS from the MAINFRAME to my
PC.
I am having a bit of difficulty
I highly recommend using the ISPF Workstation Agent (WSA.EXE). It makes file
transfers really easy and doesn't require you to enter a userid and password.
Check here for instructions:
http://www.tsotimes.com/articles/archive/spring04/wsafiletransfer.html
Hope that helps,
Dave Salt
SimpList(t
Hallo All,
It has been a long while since I downloaded a PDS from the MAINFRAME to my PC.
I am having a bit of difficulty having them downloaded with a .txt extension.
I did the following :
ftp-1
open (ip address)
supplied userid and password
LCD U:\FTP
CD 'NGL02D.UTIL.JCL'
mget * *.txt
Howe
Hi
Thank you very much
On 1/17/2011 2:30 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:09:46 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari
wrote:
Hi
Any REXX function to decide if a string contains only printable characters?
I'm sure there are different ways. Here is what I do in my IPLINFO exec
for dis
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:09:46 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari
wrote:
>Hi
>
>Any REXX function to decide if a string contains only printable characters?
>
I'm sure there are different ways. Here is what I do in my IPLINFO exec
for displaying subsystem names which often have non-display characters
(I rep
Vernooij, CP wrote:
>Ok, this can cause SMF interaction. We switched smf 19 off, because we
don't need/use them.
I also dropped SMF record type 19. Thanks for your kind help. Perhaps if you
have other type of solutions, I'm all ears! This is what this list is for.
Helping
each others for free.
"Elardus Engelbrecht" wrote in message
news:...
> Vernooij, CP wrote:
> >Why? How does SMF processing on one system influence SMF processing
on
> another system? I don't see the relation between them, nor the reason
to
> spread them in time.
>
> During 'I SMF', especially when you record SMF reco
Yes.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Ray Pearce wrote:
> Wasn't it Thursdays that Arthur could never get the hang of...
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Stan Weyman
> > Sent: 15 January 2011 23:22
> > To: IBM
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
>:>Any REXX function to decide if a string contains only printable characters?
Look at functions DATATYPE and VERIFY and then come back to Binyamin's
question: Define "printable characters".
Perhaps, you could place a list of 'printable characters' in 'reference' and
u
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:09:46 +0100 Miklos Szigetvari
wrote:
:>Any REXX function to decide if a string contains only printable characters?
Define "printable characters".
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailbl
Vernooij, CP wrote:
>Why? How does SMF processing on one system influence SMF processing on
another system? I don't see the relation between them, nor the reason to
spread them in time.
During 'I SMF', especially when you record SMF record type 19, the system
writes out SMF record type 19 for eac
I have seen at Workflow/Exceptions in RMF Monitor 3 since 04.59 to 06.36 in one
of the systems of the sysplex the next delay:
CONSOLEENQ -SYSZMCS 62.5 % delay ROUTE-GROUP--CNID
This is the problem.
Subject:
Re: DUMPXY delay execution from IEFU29 swicth
From:
"Vernooij, CP - SPLXM"
Re
/* REXX */
VAR.0=2
VAR.1='SOME VALID CHARACTERS'
VAR.2='CONTAINS !§$%&/ WHICH ARE NOT VALID.'
/* VALID CHARACTERS: A-Z AND 0-9 AND BLANK */
REFERENCE=XRANGE('A','I')!!XRANGE('J','R')!!XRANGE('S','Z')
REFERENCE=REFERENCE!!XRANGE('0','9')
REFERENCE=REFERENCE!!' '
SAY 'REFERENCE IS '!!REFERE
huh, never had that issue...
maybe a spf macro (not my area of expertise) using edit command:
f p'.'
or
c p'.' ' ' all
is there only 1 character or multiple characters that your print function can't
handle?
don't have the rexx manual handy, but there are hex conversion functions the
could b
Wasn't it Thursdays that Arthur could never get the hang of...
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Stan Weyman
> Sent: 15 January 2011 23:22
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: help
>
>
> I got the '42' referen
"Elardus Engelbrecht" wrote in message
news:...
> GUIRAO LOPEZ, ALVARO wrote:
>
> >Well, I have detected that this problem didn't happen in one system,
has
> occurred in all the systems of the sysplex, 8 systems, except in one
of them
> ( ?? )
>
> >TC04 06:01:03.84 JOB50804 RO *ALL,I SMF
>
Hi
Any REXX function to decide if a string contains only printable characters?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
GUIRAO LOPEZ, ALVARO wrote:
>Well, I have detected that this problem didn't happen in one system, has
occurred in all the systems of the sysplex, 8 systems, except in one of them
( ?? )
>TC04 06:01:03.84 JOB50804 RO *ALL,I SMF
I would not recommend to do 'RO *ALL,I SMF' in your Sysplex. Spac
Don't worry about other jobs, they don't work with the same input files, some
of them process the smf data of the past hour, +PRSMF000 is a message issued by
a program in batch that don't have any relation.
Well, I have detected that this problem didn't happen in one system, has
occurred in all
Yes, 10 minutes is very strange. However I see some more strange things.
E.g. what are jobs EXLFGJ602, EXSIH530 and EXLFH722 doing? Could they be
delaying some SMF processing?
Who issues the PRSMF000 message?
What is IEFU29 doing? Could it be that the jobs are holding the SMF gdg and
that IEFU29
Hi Kees,
We have automated the SMF switch command, but I see the delay between the
switch command and the START DUMPXY command from IEFU29 is too big, 10
minutes
But the most logical it's what you say and since the switch command, the SMF
dataset continue processing and is filled, so, IEFU
"GUIRAO LOPEZ, ALVARO" wrote in message
news:<2116f82f6e2d7b4eb7da9048379f11b80a88d64...@s1128expm114.bbva.igrup
obbva>...
> Hi list,
>
> This morning we had a 10 minutes delay with the start DUMPXY command
from the 'I smf' switch, and when the IEFU29 send the start command to
the SMF dataset rep
Hi list,
This morning we had a 10 minutes delay with the start DUMPXY command from the
'I smf' switch, and when the IEFU29 send the start command to the SMF dataset
repeat the command immediately to the next SMF dataset without a switch
command, this has provoked a JCL error by duplicate data s
45 matches
Mail list logo
