Re: Explination of EUT/FRR

On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:45 PM, michealbutz wrote: > Hi, > > > I have seen these terms EUT Enabled Unlocked Task /FRR and this my > understanding >I ASSUME Enabled means Enabled for I/O interrupts BIT 6 of Psw the only > way I know how > to set this is with the LPSW inst > No, there's also

PR/SM Logical CP issues

Our CPC (2094-S18-708) now has 8 Physical CP and has 1 production LPAR, 2 maintenance LPARs, 2 ICF LPARs and 2 test LPARs running at the moment. Currently, all LPARs are equipped with shared CPs and have weight values assigned. The details are as follows. production LPAR 1 initial LCP

Re: Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of ??? ?? ??? > > Hi, > > Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9? Yes. Also runs on the z/890 at our D/R site. > Specifically a 2096-J01. Don't see why not. "A z9 is a z9", isn't it? > We currently run a z10BC-I04, and this com

Re: Explanation of EUT/FRR

Umm.. nooo... That was not quite the flag I was thinking of... if RTM1E is one, all it means is that first level RTM is processing any potential EUT FRR's for this task. Further, if RTM1E is on, then it's 'unlocked' and 'enabled'. My apologies, I do not have access to MVS at the moment so I ca

Re: Lines, Bars and ... mini-bars???

The z/OS 1.13 support is for a program to be able to survive the things that programs cannot typically avoid -- such as external and I/O interrupts, page faults. If you can get your program up there (whether by yourself or by use of "directed load" (LOAD with ADDR64), and if it calls no system

Re: Explanation of EUT/FRR

.1.. TCBRTM1E "X'40'" - RTM1 IS CURRENTLY PROCESSING EUT FRR'S FOR THIS TASK If its enabled for I/O and extern

Re: Explination of EUT/FRR

ARR's are only required by PC-ss and then too, only if they're entered in an enabled and unlocked task mode. Don't think we had them back then, hence FRR's. Aside from that, FRR's are LIFO and I believe (though I cannot remember them of the top of my bald head) there are TCB flags that indicate

Re: Explination of EUT/FRR

Didn't realize the that color was removed when the message was sent Here are my questions Thanks in Advance FRR information is stored off of PSA - not in any task related block. Statement. As opposed to a SCB Thus the routine FRR can be called by a SRB or TCB since PSA is related to the

Re: Explination of EUT/FRR

Questions in RED -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 4:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Explination of EUT/FRR On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 15:45:30 -0400 michealbutz wrote: :>

Re: Explination of EUT/FRR

On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 15:45:30 -0400 michealbutz wrote: :> I have seen these terms EUT Enabled Unlocked Task /FRR and this my understanding :> I ASSUME Enabled means Enabled for I/O interrupts BIT 6 of Psw the only way I know how :>to set this is with the LPSW inst Also External. IOW not sub

Explination of EUT/FRR

Hi, I have seen these terms EUT Enabled Unlocked Task /FRR and this my understanding I ASSUME Enabled means Enabled for I/O interrupts BIT 6 of Psw the only way I know how to set this is with the LPSW inst Unlocked means not holding a Lock Holding a Lock means using some Flavor of

Re: 1.13, IEBCOPY, and APF

>From one of the older threads, I thought IEBCOPY was not linked as AC(1) but the 'older' iebcopy still was and is supposed to have been renamed to IEBCOPYO or so... Kind Regards Jim Thomas 617-233-4130 (mobile) 636-294-1014(res) j...@thethomasresidence.us (Email)

Re: ACF2 SVCs Required?!?

In <4e20ac6e.2020...@ync.net>, on 07/15/2011 at 04:09 PM, Rick Fochtman said: >A "principal" is a school official; Among other things. Check the other definitions. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see We d

Re: 1.13, IEBCOPY, and APF

In <9774586403039933.wa.m42tomibmmainyahoo@bama.ua.edu>, on 07/15/2011 at 12:20 PM, Tom Marchant said: >No. AC=1 in SYS1.LINKLIB. The old one was, but are you saying that the new (z/OS 1.13) IEBCOPY is still AC(1)? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position;

Re: Making Z/OS easier - Effectively replacing JCL with Unix like commands

"Paul Gilmartin" wrote in message news:<3339201005293115.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu>... > On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 09:00:16 -0700, Cris Hernandez #9 wrote: > > >JCL consists of about 120 words last I checked (not counting those goofy conditional statements IBM created recently for those who co

Re: Making Z/OS easier - Effectively replacing JCL with Unix like commands

On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 09:00:16 -0700, Cris Hernandez #9 wrote: >JCL consists of about 120 words last I checked (not counting those goofy >conditional statements IBM created recently for those who couldn't comprehend >COND codes), average batch job uses about 20 or 25. ... > It's pretty hard to t

Re: Making Z/OS easier - Effectively replacing JCL with Unix like commands

JCL consists of about 120 words last I checked (not counting those goofy conditional statements IBM created recently for those who couldn't comprehend COND codes), average batch job uses about 20 or 25. Seems a whole lot easier to me to just learn JCL. --

Re: Making Z/OS easier - Effectively replacing JCL with Unix like commands

On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:35:30 +1000, Clement Clarke wrote: >All Operating Systems run Programs, use Data Sets or Files, and have >some sort of Command Language. > >If Z/OS Users didn't have to be concerned about DCB, SPACE and so on, >then they could write JCL that was very similar to Unix or Linux

Re: Making Z/OS easier - Effectively replacing JCL with Unix like commands

>If Z/OS Users didn't have to be concerned about DCB, SPACE and so on, then >they could write JCL that was very similar to Unix or Linux. If you implement properly under SMS, you can reduce the burden significantly. And, it's probably less complex than a DCB database. - Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yaho

Re: Making Z/OS easier - Effectively replacing JCL with Unix like commands

z/OS users can also use unix-like shell scripts, REXX scripts, CLIST scripts... It's also possible to run such scripts "under JCL" or submit JCL jobs from the scripts, etc. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 2011-07-17 15:35, Clement Clarke pisze: All Operating Systems run Programs, us

Re: Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9

Thanks Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Rutledge Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 4:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9 גדי בן אבי wrote: > Hi, > > Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9? > Specific

Making Z/OS easier - Effectively replacing JCL with Unix like commands

All Operating Systems run Programs, use Data Sets or Files, and have some sort of Command Language. If Z/OS Users didn't have to be concerned about DCB, SPACE and so on, then they could write JCL that was very similar to Unix or Linux. If all that information is stored in a Data Base of Data

Re: Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9

W dniu 2011-07-17 14:20, גדי בן אבי pisze: Hi, Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9? Specifically a 2096-J01. We currently run a z10BC-I04, and this computer will be our DR system. Yes, it does. All z/machines are supported by z/OS, so you can run z/OS 1.11, 1.12 and 1.13 on machines z900-z990-z9-z10-

Re: Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9

גדי בן אבי wrote: Hi, Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9? Specifically a 2096-J01. We're running it on a -V03. It's documented in http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/E0Z2B1A1/CCONTENTS We currently run a z10BC-I04, and this computer will be our DR system. Bob

Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9

Hi, Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9? Specifically a 2096-J01. We currently run a z10BC-I04, and this computer will be our DR system. Thanks Gadi לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי החברה וזכויות החתימה בה, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה, מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורש

MFNetDisk CCW trace and PCI bit in CCW.

HI, Small activity in the MF forum. So I decide to send email also to the forums. If you do not like it, delete it. One user in France ask me to enable send script from MF to PC even if the user do not have in his PC defined emulators or replicators PC device. The users separate the functionalit