Hi
For HFS I would not try with DESERV, but with readdir
On 4/20/2012 2:58 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
I need to be able to process for input all members of a PDS, PDSE, or HFS
folder. I need to process them individually - the order does not matter -
and not as one big concatenated file.
flockfile seems to be a C thing and locks the file from other tasks. That will
not help me. First this is a Java application and second I want to share the
file between tasks of the same program.
I allocate the file in the Java application. I do not specify a DD. All I do is
open the file in
Hi
Can't find the JOBID field on the SDSF PS panel (nor via REXX) .
Do I lost it or I need to customize ?
(z/OS 1.12 missing but I have it on 1.13)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Miklos,
Type ARRANGE and see if it has a / in front of it.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 6:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Jobid on SDSF PS panel ?
Hi
Replying to my own post. I forgot a step.
On the action bar, pull down VIEW and select 2 (Arrange).
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 6:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Hi
Thank you Bob, with ARRANGE ? I don't see it at all, but I don't see
the JOBNAME either
On 4/20/2012 12:59 PM, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
Replying to my own post. I forgot a step.
On the action bar, pull down VIEW and select 2 (Arrange).
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Have You tried with the '?' command ?
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist AM/DQS SWEDBANK AB (publ)
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För
Miklos
Wow!! I need more coffee before I reply to anything more today.
Forget both of my posts. I missed the PS part and interpreted the ARRANGE /
option wrong!
I apologize for wasting everyone's time.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu]
Yes , with ARRANGE ? but no JOBID
As far as I can remember it is a default SDSF setup
On 4/20/2012 1:17 PM, Thomas Berg wrote:
Have You tried with the '?' command ?
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist AM/DQS SWEDBANK AB
I mean just/only '?'.
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist AM/DQS SWEDBANK AB (publ)
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För
Miklos Szigetvari
Skickat: den
On 4/20/2012 1:27 PM, Thomas Berg wrote:
I mean just/only '?'.
No answer at all for ?
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist AM/DQS SWEDBANK AB (publ)
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I need to be able to process for input all members of a PDS, PDSE, or
HFS folder.
Refer to UNIX System Services File System Interface Reference SA22-7808.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Ok, I can't see the PS window here due to sec. block.
But I supposed that You got other columns in the window as with e g the H
window through the '?' command.
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist AM/DQS SWEDBANK AB (publ)
The only explanation given for installation-wide is SMP/E uses this
table data set to save process status information for the SYSMOD
management dialogs. What problems occur[1] if you don't use a shared
SMPTABL?I've run into problems when it's shared.
The intent is to allow users to share
My use was in 1969 and only at Fort Ben. From school, I went to Fort Monroe,
VA
and worked on a 360/40 running PCP version of OS/360.
I remembered that the 1004 had a plugboard, but I thought that you could also
run programs on it. We may have had to assembler the programs on the 1005.
The
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:18:45 +0800, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, fcntl() can be used to implement byte-range-locking. So in
theory you could use it to implement
row-level locking in a dictionary library. ENQ is not that granular.
ENQ is as granular as the application
I think the only way to do what you want is via the UNIX readdir type
functionality. The only thing I can find for reading a directory using non-UNIX
BPAM support are the BLDL and FIND macros. Conspicuously missing is DESERV
support.
Also, here
The OP originally stated that he had two STC processes that updated the same
z/Unix file at the same time and wanted to prevent this. Are two STC's both
considered z/Unix processes under the same kernel when they are running on the
same LPAR? If so, ISTM that locking and unlocking the file
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:16:51 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 4f8eb53d.9000...@us.ibm.com, on 04/18/2012
at 08:36 AM, Kurt Quackenbush ku...@us.ibm.com said:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 8:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: USS File Integrity
The OP originally stated that he had two STC processes that
Synchronizing file access between threads in a single program in java is
trivial. Java has a built-in synchronized methods to implement critical
sections. I'm not sure how well it would scale though as I guess there
implemented by calling the pthread API.
On 20/04/2012, at 9:01 PM, Farley,
DB2 does not necessarily materialize the whole result set in every situation.
Since the DB2 optimizer knows nothing about the loop in your program it can't
incorporate your intentions. Try using FETCH FIRST 50 ROWS ONLY clause or
OPTIMIZE FOR 50 ROWS clause in your cursor.
Wild card at the
I know CA-MIM , if memory serves me correctly works across Plexes and Lpars.
I am not sure if it works across Unix file systems in a similar manner
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Apr 20, 2012, at 9:43 AM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
Synchronizing
Thanks everyone for the insights!! I'll begin the research on this
information.
__
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email from the State of California is for the sole
use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and
I don't believe I ever had occasion to use PS before this moment. It works
fine for me on R12 and R13:
JOBNAME JobIDStatus OwnerState CPU-Time
TCPIPSTC00235 RUNNING STARTED MR 5398.39
This function is a *relatively* recent
Hi,
This post was not answered. Can anybody help me out?
From: willie bunter williebun...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 12:13:35 PM
Subject: SMS QUESTION
I encountered the problem with defining a VSAM EXTENDED dsn at a
On 4/19/2012 2:56 PM, Roberts, John J wrote:
For the code critics: I know it could be better with UNSTRING, and it would be
trivial in PL/I or C. But as it is, it works. Improvements are for the young.
Us old-timers have only so many more clock cycles left.
It has no GOTOs. Gasp! :-)
--
Try a smaller space allocation.
willie bunter williebun...@yahoo.com wrote in message news:
1334937117.83658.yahoomail...@web113615.mail.gq1.yahoo.com...
Hi,
This post was not answered. Can anybody help me out?
From: willie bunter williebun...@yahoo.com
This is a catalog error.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of willie bunter
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMS QUESTION
Hi,
This post was not answered. Can anybody help me out?
Most likely... user error.
If you list the production one, what DATACLAS does it use? Are you sure
the ACS routines will assign the correct DATACLAS without you
explicitly requesting it? It appears it does not for this data set
even though it may have for the BCDS - or your define for the
BCDS
On 4/19/2012 2:56 PM, Roberts, John J wrote:
For the code critics: I know it could be better with UNSTRING, and it would
be trivial in PL/I or C. But as it is, it works. Improvements are for the
young. Us old-timers have only so many more clock cycles left.
It has no GOTOs. Gasp! :-)
I
You need to look at SFSMSdfp Diagnosis to see why the IGDVTSCU error is
being returned. The indication is that you exceeded 4GB, the define at 4000
indicates that after you reduced it to under 4 GB it worked, so something is
amiss in the extended addressability situation. DR is inherently
That is what I did to fix the problem. But my question is why this would
happen. The SMS rules show that it is VSAM EXTENDED and the volume is a 3390-9
model.
From: Ernie Takeuchi e.m.takeu...@att.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012
Sorry, was responding to another problem. Got replies crossed over.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Fuerst [mailto:d...@bkassociates.net]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 12:20 PM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Cc: Doug Fuerst
Subject: RE: SMS QUESTION
This is a catalog error.
That is what I did to fix the problem. But my question is why this would
happen. The SMS rules show that it is VSAM EXTENDED and the volume is a
3390-9 model.
It would appear based on the little evidence we see that it was not VSAM
Extended. You say your SMS rules show that it is VE -
You have to see if the proper SMS path was used. The indication is that the
EA bit was not active for this allocation. If it does not fail with a
similar allocation of a test file in your normal system, you may have to
wait until the next DR shot to figure it out.
Doug
-Original Message-
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:37:29 -0700, willie bunter williebun...@yahoo.com
wrote:
That is what I did to fix the problem. But my question is why this would
happen. The SMS rules show that it is VSAM EXTENDED and the volume is a
3390-9 model.
SMS rules don't show anything. A LISTCAT after
Bob, thanks, a lot of stuff in there, most of it waay beyond what I
need. Is there a particular service you had in mind for my problem below?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Friday, April 20,
Thanks.
Sounds like I will need two code paths:
- DESERV for PDS(E)
- readdir (which in my general UNIX ignorance I was not aware of) for HFS
directories
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent:
Does anyone know of an ACF2 to RACF conversion utility?
--
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
There certainly used to be a utility from Top Secret to RACF that IBM used
when they converted us. I suspect each of the major Vendors will have
utilities/services that convert TO their favoured product.
Jerry Whitteridge
Lead Systems Programmer
Safeway Inc.
925 951 4184
If you feel in control
I think Vanguard has tools to do that.
--
Donald Grinsell
State of Montana
406-444-2983
dgrins...@mt.gov
We want a few mad people now. See where the sane ones have landed us!
~ George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:54:25 -0400, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know of an ACF2 to RACF conversion utility?
IBM, Vanguard, and others have utilities that will help with that, usually (as
far as I know) as part of a priced service offering. And from my experiences
watching
Can you produce the output of LISTCAT ENT('SYS2.MCDS') ALL from both systems
and see what the differences are?
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
:: Behalf Of willie bunter
:: Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 9:37 AM
:: To:
Hi,
Was wondering If someone could clear up some things for me
A S0C4 reason code 4 means the storage key and the PSW key don't match
typically trying to access storage key 0 when the PSW key is key 8
Two questions arise from this
. Does it matter what the PSW key at the
The storage keys exceptions are determined during the process of executing
the specific instruction. The value of PSW key at any time prior to the
specific instruction being executed is not relevant.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.netwrote:
Hi,
Was
Conversion here happened in the mid 80s years before I came. The method
was apparently RYO brute force 'translation' of every attribute in ACF2 to
something comparable (or at least workable) in RACF. The result is that
today we have over 14K userids and over 4K groups. These numbers far
exceed
All,
I have a question, we have a COBOL Tcpip client, server hybrid.
We drive with the destination ip address or dns host name and port.
The issue is this
1. Destination is a host 'abcdef' for example pointing to ip address
192.168.1.222
2. Host 'abcdef' goes down, tcpip client goes into
On 20 April 2012 17:19, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net wrote:
A S0C4 reason code 4 means the storage key and the PSW key don't match
There are other possible reasons for an 0C4-04 abend, but 0C4-04 is
always a protection exception of some sort.
typically trying to access storage key 0
On 2012-04-20 11:53, Martin Truebner wrote in ASSEMBLER-LIST:
Did you ever try to copy code from a PDF? As and idea: a funny char
aside of the space (in col 1) and an other one in col 10 and col 16
would make it a easy to rebuild source from a (PDF-)printed manual.
1) There's another good
The current (V1R13) LE Concepts Guide refers to the IBM C/C++ Productivity
Tools for OS/390 product. Is that really the current name of the product
(OS/390)? It's Windows-based? Does anyone have any idea of the pricing? (I
don't have an IBM salesperson in my hip pocket.)
Thanks,
Charles
I do not know if that is the name of the product, but several things in C/C++
for z/OS report themselves as OS/390. And that is what many of the open source
products expect for z/OS.
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Fri,
I looked into the product a few years ago and it wasn't available via
partnerworld. It's mostly been deprecated by RDz. I was mostly interested in
the profiler.
On 21/04/2012, at 7:28 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
The current (V1R13) LE Concepts Guide refers to the IBM C/C++
I was mostly interested in the profiler.
Me too. What did you end up using?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of David Crayford
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 6:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM C/C++
54 matches
Mail list logo
