Kirk,
Yes, I agree also and the ability to read a manualhave a ton of customers
who don't even take the time to rtfm..l
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Jun 1, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Kirk Talman wrote:
> IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 05/23/2012
> 05:39:26 PM:
>
>> From: "Roberts
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 03:21:33 +, Tom Williamson wrote:
>Hello,
>
>We have a customer that is doing some tape migration.
>They are currently using STK SMC manage their SILO.
>
>If we create a SMS Tape Library (MTL) and add a volume to it that is also in
>the SILO which unit will be picked by al
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 17:06:35 +0200, Giovanni Santuz wrote:
>
>RD =RANDOM(1,9)
>HSMDS = 'TWRK.TEMP.D'!!RD
>"HLIST DSNAME('"ODSN"') ODS('"HSMDS"')"
>CALL READ_HSMDS
>
Is RANDOM() the best way to do this, given that there's a 50%
chance of collision in 372 tries? Would it be better (and more
info
If SMS TCDB (aka VOLCAT) has a volume entry SMS111, the DD1
allocation with DISP=OLD goes to the SMS Tape Library even though
SMC/HSC control data set has a volume entry SMS111 for the volume in
the SILO.
As you know, DISP=NEW allocation is controlled by SMS ACS routines you wrote.
If you want t
Am 03.06.2012 04:10, schrieb Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.):
In
,
on 06/02/2012
at 12:02 PM, Itschak Mugzach said:
Did you try REXX OUTTRAP function?
OUTTRAP catches PUTLINE and PUTGET, not TPUT.
HI
Here a sample to Do a HLIST, and process the info in the REXX.Proc
Data is written in the STE
On 6/3/12, Giovanni Santuz wrote:
> Am 01.06.2012 18:43, schrieb Lizette Koehler:
>> Cross Posting to IBM Main and TSO-REXX
>>
>>
>> I have a Rexx process that issues the HLIST command. I have been
>> successful
>> in trapping the output from the HLIST but have an issue when the message
>>
>> ARC
Am 01.06.2012 18:43, schrieb Lizette Koehler:
Cross Posting to IBM Main and TSO-REXX
I have a Rexx process that issues the HLIST command. I have been successful
in trapping the output from the HLIST but have an issue when the message
ARC0138I is issued.
I have tried turning off all of the TS
We run CMF since ages, so I don't know RMF, but we are very happy with
it. Compatibility is 101%, the standard 70-records are the same as RMF's
and they write extra info in CMF records. BMC has a close relation with
IBM, so they follow new z/Oss and hardware promptly.
I can recommend the MAINVIEW p
8 matches
Mail list logo
