z/OS1.11 running just fine with
with the NCS 6.1 HSC, SMC, VTCS. EXLM 6.0
My 2 cents, 6.2 is not current - might as well go to 7.x if you have to
upgrade at all.
- Original Message -
From: Curtis Jackson cnjack...@gfb.org
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Check Tivoli Advanced Catalog Management from IBM -
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=cainfotype=anappname=iSourcesupplier=897letternum=ENUS209-285opencm_mmc=5318-_-n-_-vrm_newsletter-_-10577_127721cmibm_em=dm:0:5357837
You might be pleased with what you find 'under the
The other item to check into is how often you do an EXPIREBV.
We recycle ML2 on one LPAR, Backup on another, automation isses the recycle
commands at 4:30 AM every day and we let it run till 5:00 PM (or it might
finish by itself) when automation issues a HOLD RECYCLE, automation issues a
Most likely you have sent a tape that has not been 'marked full' offsite.
A list of your ML2 tapes should confirm this. You might consider checking
the backup tapes also.
- Original Message -
From: O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] obrie...@mail.nih.gov
Newsgroups:
Here is a piece of redbook,
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245272.pdf
. If I want to list all of the data sets that have been either migrated or
recalled, which command do I use?
If you want to obtain a list of all the data sets that have an entry in the
MCDS, even though they
Lizette,
Have you checked PowerLink for Microcode fixes? Specifically you should ask
your local rep about turning off the Symmetrix Fast Cache Write logic at
5671 level.
Regards, Doug
- Original Message -
From: Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
You might want to create the dataclas named DEFAULT. Check the SMS books to
be sure. Then at least you get rid of the null DSORG.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: Darth Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, February 20,
John,
Older (really old) 3494 models had 4 drives per each Axx and Bxx CU (each
group of 4 on it's own CUADD).Maybe?
Doug
- Original Message -
From: McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 1:26 PM
Correction, 4 devices per CU (not CUADD-had VTS in mind while typing)
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Shupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: ATL drive allocation problem.
John,
Older
Willie,
Not saying this is a great answer, you could look into the RACF side of
things.
Have each dataset or generic dataset profile defined in RACF (wild card what
you can) and then use the RESOWNER and RACF DFP segment to pass the dataclas
you want. Takes some one time ACS coding.
Have had
John,
Go to the HMC and do problem analysis on the PCHID to see if you are getting
sequence errors.
Possibly a bad cable or connection.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: John Ticic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007
There is NO way to compare ISPF to CMS XEDIT. XEDIT beats all.
ISPF is and has been lacking, now things do get better now and then.
You can compare VSE ICCF MACRO logic to ISPF and come out even.
Last requirement I wrote was on the GUIDE VSE to MVS impediments with Pete
Clarke. Circa 1986?
Jim,
Your comments are well founded in fact! IBM support knowns what you need.
Novell is still a PC oriented vendor. It's borke, I'm sorry wait for the
next release.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Dixie Stores Inc
- Original Message -
From: Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: IODF Definitions for ICP
On Saturday, 09/23/2006 at 10:05 AST, Douglas Shupe [EMAIL PROTECTED
The very best way to get comfortable with the ICP IOGEN is to read the
PEER-TO-PEER document written by John Huges WSC.
If you like I can send a copy, link unknown, maybe Alan can hunt it up. It
is a GREAT paper.
Regards,
Doug Shupe
- Original Message -
From: Crispin Hugo [EMAIL
The IODF must be in one extent or it will not be usable.
Regards,
Doug Shupe
- Original Message -
From: Rankin, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: DSS RESTORE - how to enforce CONTIG
Ran into the same issue. We were able to isolate the SNAP target datasets to
a SMS Storage Group ONLY for EMC Timefinder.
We did allocate some volumes from each EMC DASD box to the production SMS
Storage Group (the number depends on your usage and file sizes). This was
done to ensure that
IDC3506I A REQUIRED VOLUME LIST HAS BEEN OMITTED
Explanation: The VOLUMES parameter does not appear in the command when
required.
Application Programmer Response: Probable user error. A volume list must
be available to DATA and INDEX objects (the INDEX object appears only
Willie,
John has you looking in the right places.
I would first find out what the allocation request was. Was it something
'wrong' like 4000 Cylinders? z/OS 1.6 gives the KB of the request.
Did the volumes enabled have the space available? Suspect not if you are
allocating into the overflow pool.
Dennis,
You will notice the same problem with HFS or zFS.
The response I always get from the list is that IBM has a product, (not a
great answer considering zFS and HFS are base components).
It would seem prudent for IBM to include the lacking function in the base
z/OS or DFSMS. They DO NOT,
When a DB2 ASID requests a dump, the initial allocation request is larger than
a MOD-3.
Currently we just reply 'D' to trash the dump request.
What controls are available in z/OS 1.6 to set a maximum primary/secondary
allocation for dumps?
SMS Dataclass? Parmlib ?
Regards,
Doug
Gents,
Thank you for the commentary, will add larger volumes to the budget wish
list, possibly the question was not clear. So here is a more specific
question.
When DB2 wants to dump, specifically where do I get to specify the primary
and secondary space allocations for that dump?
Regards,
wants more than a MOD-3
Douglas Shupe wrote:
When DB2 wants to dump, specifically where do I get to specify the
primary and secondary space allocations for that dump?
This part is well documented. Issue:
DD ADD,SMS=(DATA=dataclas,STOR=storclas,MGMT=mgmtclas)
to set the SMS classes
Another novel thought,
IBM should also make their premier DFSMSDSS program ADRDSSU capable of
backing up and restoring HFS and zFS files at the file level instead of just
the shell they live in.
Maybe this is in z/OS 1.7, or a vision in 1.8?
Regards, Doug
- Original Message -
From:
25, 2006 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: Allocation request for a DB2 dump wants more than a MOD-3
Douglas Shupe wrote:
Unfortunately, the SMS DATACLAS allocations are being ignored due to some
function thinking it has a better idea and passing the excessively large
primary and secondary allocations
Marco,
You did not mention the platform you are on so,
VSE/ESA - IDCAMS - CANCEL STEP or CANCEL JOB
z/OS - has a CANCEL but did NOT implement the CANCEL JOB. They claim
conditional JCL is the answer - what a waste of key strokes.
This lack of function has been on my list of requests to IBM
Can anyone tell me how to restore a multi-volume z/OS HFS using DSS and end up
with the restored HFS in 300 cylinder extents? DSS is so 'smart' that it
always deletes my pre-allocated HFS and tries to make 9000 cyl extents. Guess
what, I want to put the HFS on some MOD-3's instead of MOD-9's.
27 matches
Mail list logo
