There is NO way to compare ISPF to CMS XEDIT. XEDIT beats all.
ISPF is and has been lacking, now things do get better now and then.
You can compare VSE ICCF MACRO logic to ISPF and come out even.
Last requirement I wrote was on the GUIDE VSE to MVS impediments with Pete
Clarke. Circa 1986?
IBM response - Future objective or rejected.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pinnacle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Call for XEDIT freaks, submit ISPF requirements
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: Call for XEDIT freaks, submit ISPF requirements
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:50 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
So quit B&M'ing about how ISPF sucks compared to XEDIT, and submit some
requirements. If not, STF up.
Yo Tom, feeling better ???.
Don't expect any input from me - I've never even seen XEDIT.
Shane ...
(you a Tarantino fan by any chance ?)
Shane,
Had to go on a rant, especially when I see people who I KNOW belong to
SHARE member companies, continually complain about some feature lack, but
they NEVER submit requirements! Still waiting for the XEDIT freaks to
submit a requirement or ask how to.
Kill Bill Vol. 1 and 2 were masterpieces (the freakin' Ironside theme?
Awesome!).
Tom
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
