Re: Lookat under TSO

Dana, That is it. Thank you. Ed On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:08:13 -0500, Dana Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:09:03 -0500, Ed Micucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Dana, >> >>I've i

Re: Lookat under TSO

sorry, I mean ISPLLIB of course. On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:38:33 -0500, Ed Micucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Ted, > >Thanks. It is indeed in ISRSUBS, in a library named SISPLPA. I put this >library in my ISPPLIB concat, and I do get a different result, whether I >point-and

Re: Lookat under TSO

Ted, Thanks. It is indeed in ISRSUBS, in a library named SISPLPA. I put this library in my ISPPLIB concat, and I do get a different result, whether I point-and-click (%lookcsr), or just run "tso lookat" (from #6 or the ISPF command line): 1 +++ ? IRX0013I Error running LOOKAT, line

Re: Lookat under TSO

gt;email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >web: www.crawfordandcompany.com > > > >IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/24/2008 >08:09:03 AM: > >> -- Information from the mail header >> --- >

Re: Lookat under TSO

Dana, I've installed the TSO/Lookat, and I don't even get that far: IKJ56500I COMMAND SETMSG NOT FOUND, 57 *-* 'SETMSG MSG(ISRZ002)', +++ RC(-3) +++, Does this look familiar at all to anyone? Thanks. Ed

Re: Health Checker suspended writing to log stream

Peter, Maybe the "never does finish" was a bad assumption on my part. I've since noticed that if you later disable/enable (via "F hzsproc,LOGGER=OFF ..LOGGER=ON" cmds), you get the "LOG STREAM...CONNECTED" message without the "SUSPENDED" error. Ed ~~

Re: Health Checker suspended writing to log stream

ago about this confusing message, and they >>indicated that they might fix this (by eliminating it) at some point in the >>future. >> >>On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:56:56 -0500, Ed Micucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>I am trying to run Health Checker o

Re: Health Checker suspended writing to log stream

, since there is in fact no problem. I >complained to IBM a few months ago about this confusing message, and they >indicated that they might fix this (by eliminating it) at some point in the >future. > >On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:56:56 -0500, Ed Micucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: &g

Health Checker suspended writing to log stream

s the "staging data set...has not finished being formatted". Whatever formatting process its talking about never does finish. Does anyone have any tips/ideas? Thanks. Ed Micucci Sysprog, Penn State -- For IBM-MAIN subs

Re: Basic Sysplex and CFRM

Thanks, Jim. That makes sense. On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:30:19 -0500, Jim Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Ed, > >I'll state my past experience. If you do not have a coupling facility, you >could not have a CFRM policy. Hope this helps. > >

Basic Sysplex and CFRM

Does anyone know if you can use CFRM with a BASIC sysplex? (as opposed to a Parallel Sysplex) Thanks. Ed Micucci -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the

Re: CA7 Slowdown after 1.7 implementation

e you running? Thanks. Ed Micucci ~ On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:58:56 -0500, Casey Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Has anyone had any issues with CA7 since moving to 1.7. We have 14 >sysplex's and only have this problem

Re: CA7 Slowdown after 1.7 implementation

Casey, May I ask what release of CA7 you are on? Ed Micucci -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http

Re: HMC : Dynamic I/O

Thanks to all for replies. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Re: HMC : Dynamic I/O

Ted, We have NO storage available for this. I will have to steal some from a test LPAR. So I'm looking for the minimal amount needed. We're running a z890. Ed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruction

HMC : Dynamic I/O

orage from an LPAR, and I'd like to keep it to the minimum. Any info will be greatly appreciated. Ed Micucci -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the messag

Re: SHOWZOS v712

fine on R7 and R8. > >Roland > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Micucci >Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:44 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU >Subject: SHOWZOS v712 > > >Dear Fellow Respire

SHOWZOS v712

Dear Fellow Respirers, Has anyone tried SHOWZOS v712? ...under z/OS 1.7? If so, have you gotten any s0c1's when running it? Thanks. Ed Micucci -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send ema

Re: 3590 mount counts

Thanks to all for excellent info. Ed Micucci -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu

3590 mount counts

I'm trying to get 3590 mount counts for past fiscal year. EREP has mount counts for 34xx, but not 3590. Same problem with SMF #94 records. Looks like SMF #74 might have them, but we've been using "NO TAPE" parm setting. Does anyone have some ideas?