If the GDG base is defined as scratch and you modify the GDG limit to x,
everything greater than x gets scratched.
Or at least, that's how we have done this in the past.
Bob Herring
Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies
Waco, TX
WWW.TXFB-INS.COM
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The foregoing
reply to the sender that you have
received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Herring, Bobby
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 9:36 AM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Clarification on IEHPROGM
We still use it to batch rename members
We still use it to batch rename members in a PDS. Is that covered by the IDCAMS
functions?
Bob Herring
Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies
Waco, TX
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The foregoing message (including attachments) is
covered by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
How do you keep something on the spool for years? We delete stuff over 5
*days*, every day at 17:00!
We had programmers that wanted us to guarantee that their stuff would still be
in the queue after a week and we told them it wasn't possible. Also, when it
gets 80% full, it changes the delete
We once tried this and fought it for several days before finding out that a
VSAM restore from a physical backup cannot be renamed. Rename is only valid for
VSAM if it is from a logical backup.
Bobby Herring
Systems Programmer
Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
and
then overwrite the existing and it will work , or am I wrong?
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Herring, Bobby bherr...@txfb-ins.comwrote:
We once tried this and fought it for several days before finding out
that a VSAM restore from a physical backup cannot be renamed. Rename
is only valid for VSAM
I thought I remembered it being there on the 138.
This picture says it's from the front of one. Found it on Google images.
http://www.purestockphotos.co.uk/cgi-bin/sitewise.pl?act=detpt=p=140
Bob
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The foregoing message (including attachments) is
covered by the
We are thinking about getting the RTD product from Dino Software.
Does anyone have any good or bad experience with the product?
Offlist if fine if you prefer.
Bobby Herring
Systems Programmer
Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies
Waco, TX
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The foregoing message
Yes, we do a yearly DR test. This year, we had a z10 and ran on a z10 at DR. We
have now installed the z196 and the question came up because we are not
guaranteed what machine type we will be running on at the BCRS site. It could
be a z10 or as old as a z900, like we did at the 2010 test.
We
We just recently installed a z196.
At IBM's BCRS, we will be running on a z10 or possibly as old as a z900.
Management is questioning our Language Environment settings. They are afraid
that if we use the new LE Cobol compiler, the load modules might be
incompatible with the older machine at
Also, make sure you get the case correct. We got burned once when it wasn't
folded to uppercase and didn't match.
Bobby Herring
System Programmer
Texas Farm Bureau Ins
Waco, TX
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The foregoing message (including attachments) is
covered by the Electronic Communication
We were told that 32760 sessions were not allowed on the Linux HMC. Something
about it causing problems.
We installed PComm on another workstation connected to the router that the HMC
uses. We used the same addresses we had used for the HMC console sessions.
We added VNC to that workstation so
You do realize that any DR site you go to is probably going to give you
a portion of a z9 or z10 equivalent to your needs and those boxes will
not have an OS/2 HMC? Sounds like you are planning for something that is
not available now, except at your site.
Thanks, Bobby Herring
-Original
Does anyone know of a way to obtain image counts and physical page
counts from SMF records? We've looked at file1 on the CBT tape and
didn't see anything that looked like it would collect printer statistics
from SMF.
We are at z/OS 1.10.
Thank you,
Bobby Herring
Texas Farm Bureau Insurance
We have IBM's DS-8100 DASD and are trying to get their Tivoli Storage
Productivity Center for Disk(TPC) software to work. It seems to mostly
work for the dark side people but we have not been able to get it to
work for the mainframe side. It doesn't show the volser of the volume.
It has something
Thanks for all the ideas and replies.
We weren't seeing a problem with the tapes. We were looking at something
else and happened to notice the channel utilization on the VTS virtual
drives. We were thinking that the virtual tape performance was ok.
We will do some more investigation and will
We have a 3494 VTS, with 64 virtual 3490 drives, connected with four
ESCON channels. At times, we are seeing 80-90% channel usage.
I have searched manuals, the web and IBMLink and cannot find a number
for what is considered a limit for Escon channel usage.
Does anyone know what that number
Well, we're not sure if it is a bottleneck or not. It we were hitting a
wall, we wanted to know so we could look at options. We weren't sure if
there was a saturation design point like the one advertised for the
CPU.
So, you think 100% is ok and we probably shouldn't worry about it?
Thanks,
We are trying to sort DASD addresses and it puts the alpha addresses in
front of the numerics. I seem to remember a long time ago, we used an
alternate sort sequence for something like this.
Does anyone use this?
Thanks, Bobby Herring
Texas Farm Bureau Ins
-Original Message-
From: IBM
I have searched the archives and Google and came up empty.
Does anyone know of a Rexx exec that can read the XCF dataset and
extract the definitions needed to re-create it for DR purposes? Someone
here thought they had heard it mentioned somewhere but can't remember
where.
Thanks,
Bobby
We didn't know about the CICS P RESET command.
How do you deal with DB2 subsystems? Do you bounce them?
Thanks,
Bobby Herring
Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent:
My manager went to the zSeries Expo a few months back and said he heard
a presentation that mentioned using negative weights when configuring
LPAR's. We have 4 LPAR's and want two of them to only get time when the
other two don't need it. We have them capped now but that also limits
them when
My management is asking if z/OS can use an atomic clock like the server
farm does. The last I remember was a sysplex timer with an external time
box of some kind. I'm speaking from memory and not experience.
Are these still used and can they be attached to a z890? Are they
expensive?
Any
23 matches
Mail list logo