Re: A z/OS Redbook Corrected - just about!

2012-03-26 Thread Jaya Relim
Well . . . my original post said almost homophonic, but a quick trip to m-w.com gave accept \ik-ˈsept, ak- also ek-\ except \ik-ˈsept\ So, since Webster gave the same primary pronunciation for both, I thought that I was maybe splitting hairs and removed the word almost. Suffice to say,

Re: Military Time?

2006-02-23 Thread jaya relim
At 18:47 o'clock PM, Joel C. Ewing said: Thinking in terms of discontinuities: if one ignores the definitions and insists on assigning noon and midnight some AM and PM designation, making noon be PM introduces two discontinuities in the notation around noon (1159 AM - 1200 PM - 0001 PM) and

Re: Military Time?

2006-02-23 Thread jaya relim
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:13, howard.brazee wrote: My take is that the best way to deal with it is to write my programs to recognize that not everybody will make the same assumptions on what 12:00 AM means. Yours seems to be to assume that one irrational choice is more preferred than the other

Re: Military Time?

2006-02-22 Thread jaya relim
At 2006-02-21 09:08, Howard Brazee wrote: But if someone enters 12:00 PM, obviously that is 12 after noon, not 12 before noon - but is midnight before or after noon?Nobody has a clock that accepts 12:00 m or 12:00 mm. Wrong as it is, the only reasonable way to interpret 12:00 PM is 12

Re: Military Time?

2006-02-22 Thread jaya relim
At 2006-02-22 14:18, Howard Brazee wrote: On 22 Feb 2006 10:13:26 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wrong as it is, the only reasonable way to interpret 12:00 PM is 12 Noon because of its proximity to 12:01 PM, 12:02 PM, ... , 12:59 PM. Similarly 12:00 AM would be 12:00 Midnight. 12 Noon