Re: Problem with I/O

2009-08-06 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
It looks like unit 6005 should belong to subsystem X'6000'. You (or your CE), should check the subsystem definitions. You can use the DEVSERV command to interrogate your online DASD. John Hi. II have this messagges in the system log: IEE103I UNIT 6005 NOT BROUGHT ONLINE 677

Re: SMS Dataset Allocation Problem

2009-06-23 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
TIOT A lot of SMS sites provide for multi-volume allocation in the default DATACLAS, but 40 would be unusually high Unit Count to provide all datasets. Why? I've worked in shops that set the default, through ACS, to the max (59). I would also be careful with just setting the max (been

Re: CRECOVER or CESTPAIR MODE(RESYNC)

2009-06-21 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
I think that I'm reading too much. After I suspend (CSUSPEND) a pair, what the best/only way to get the pair resynch? From what I can read, a CESTPAIR MODE(RESYNC) will copy the changed cylinder from the PRIMARY to the PSECONDRY while a CRECOVER will recopy the PRIMARY to the PSECONDRY ? CESTPAIR

Re: Suggestions on how many Hyper PAVs to use per LCU

2009-03-09 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
You are moving to a new box, so you need to look at your current peak I/O load, for each LPAR and calculate (on an LCU basis) how loaded your new LCUs will be. The method shown below is a good starting point, but pick your factor to cope with bursts of I/O activity. Since HyperPAVs are assigned

Re: GDPS Implementation CPU Requirement

2008-12-23 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
Bob's estimate sounds about right. The control LPARs don't burn many CPU cycles. There will be a peak (or multiple peaks - depending) during the day when the status of the DASD is checked. Depending on how many devices you have, it is probably a good idea to plan this task for a quiet time. I

Re: z/VM and Mirrored DASD owned by z/OS

2008-11-26 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
-- snip -- Are you now saying that you want to use the same set of target volumes for Z\os AND Z\VM source volumes? Yes, and z/VM guest volumes as well. I could potentially bring up a z/OS guest under z/VM and want to share the DASD with other z/OS systems. Although that is not our current

Re: Interesting CS Course Syllabus

2008-11-20 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
While searching for CCW command codes (x'08' actually) I ran across this page of a computer science professor at Northern Illinois University. It seems they are learning some serious mainframe. More to the point, anyone with a spark of interest in Robert Rannie's NIU curriculum has a

Re: Listserver - XRC to GM

2008-11-16 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
-- snip -- If anyone has Migrated from XRC to Global Mirror, I was wondering if they could recommend any Docs. (best practices, guidelines...) and or share their experiences? Thanks in advance! -- snip -- Mike, the two methods are considerably different so it is important to review various

Re: HCD setup of CSS1 for PAV Aliases

2008-11-14 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
-- snip -- Not having any problems with base and aliases definitions in CSS0 but I'm trying to put the aliases in CSS1 (z9 BC). Haven't used CSS1 before. When I defined CSS1 in HCD, it seems to want unique LPARs and ChpIds in CSS1, which is not ideal. I did an experiment with a

Re: zHPF feature

2008-11-04 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
There is a very informative redbook on connectivity - IBM System z Connectivity Handbook You'll find a good description of how zHPF works (and other interesting stuff). http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/sg245444.html?Open I found this on IBM.COM

Re: GDPS Hyperswap Concurrent Copy

2008-09-25 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
You should also ensure that you protect CC with RACF so that you can control its use (which should be 0 with Hyperswap). FACILITY class and STGADMIN.ADR.COPY.CNCURRNT or STGADMIN.ADR.DUMP.CNCURRNT profiles. Also check your HSM settings. John - Original Message - From: Paolo

Re: Maximum Channel Busy Recommendation for 3494 VTS ESCON Attached

2008-09-22 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
I agree with Ted and Allan, that you really need to look at other values as well (throughput, queuing, parallel tape mounts, ..), And then you have the VTS staging/destaging, potential thrashing, .. What about future growth in your workload, the end of month runs. There are very many issues to

Re: SMS Pool Monitoring

2008-09-22 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
Well, how much money do you have available? :-) There are some very nice products that monitor mainframe DASD. They can do a LOT more than that. Long term trending, automate adding volumes to storage groups when they are full, and much more. If you want to roll your own, DCOLLECT (as Kees

Re: Tape Libraries

2008-09-20 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
The MDL can also replicate the data. One solution I am known of starts the replication at tape close. There are other options. For example. If the MAS/MDL uses a DS6800 to store the Tape volumes, then the DS6800 can PPRC (in real-time of course) to a second DS6800. This is valid for any kind of

Re: HYPERPAV

2008-09-18 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
You can also use the SETIOS command. Once the LCUs have been converted, the other LPARs can't move the aliases around. The IBM documentation states that they are ignored. RMF will show you the LCU and HyperPAV activity. The MVS DEVSERV command : D M=DEV will give you information about

Re: HYPERPAV

2008-09-17 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
You have to activate HyperPAV usage via the IECIOSxx Parmlib member (HyperPAV=Yes). The LSSes used by this LPAR will be converted to HyperPAV LSS. Sysplex 1 will have HyperPAV=No, and will continue to operate as before. Any LSS that has been converted to HyperPAV usage (by Sysplex 2) will be no

Re: Hyper PAVs vs. Dynamic PAVs

2008-09-14 Thread John Ticic IBM-MAIN
Yes. The I/O that needs an Alias will get one with HyperPAV. With Dynamic it may have to wait (depending on I/O concurrency to that UCB and current number of PAVs assigned). Additional benifts. A reduction in the number of Alias addresses that you need to define per LCU (Allows for more