Thomas,
looks like it is a HSM-Migrator message from EMC.
ECA1004E Recall of dsn Failed. Return Code: return code
ciao Lutz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
AFAIK z/OS 1.13 goes GA on 30th of September 2011.
But you can put your Shopz-Orders in the queue since 16th. of September ...
ciao Lutz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Neal,
what about using LOGCLS=x in your IEASYSxx (in your hlq.PARMLIB) ?
ciao Lutz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Bob,
please ask your friend whether there is a selection-option 'LINUX only'
for LPAR-mode on the z196's HMC. If yes, then he should give it a try.
AFAIK z/VM can run on these LINUX-only LPARs (did it on my z9).
ciao Lutz
But AFAIK you have to order PERL explicitly as a Ported Tool feature while
'composing' your ServerPac
in Shopz. It won't be delivered automatically as I remember.
Pls. correct me when I should be wrong ...
ciao Lutz
--
Matt,
and why did you specifiy TYPE(TFS) in your MOUNT-statement ? That means an
in-storage filesystem in a colony-address space ...
ciao Lutz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Yes of course, Jon.
But the question was in conjunction with a zFS filesystem and why the next
extent wasn't allocated.
And therefore I was pointing to TYPE(TFS) which includes that the mentioned
zFS filesystem is not mounted at all.
ciao Lutz
And if your /tmp directory is located in a HFS-Filesystem please
check also whether all extents could be allocated (123).
If not, probably your appropr. 3390 is full. After freeing some space you
could give it try oncee gain or allocate a new extent using the confighfs
command.
ciao
Bob,
z/OS 1.12 went GA on 24th of September and was orderable using Shopz even
about 10 days before.
Just received it here ...
ciao Lutz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Bob,
and just to mention a slight correction: I've placed my order on 10th. of
September so the limit is 2 weeks before GA for Shopz-Ordering ...
ciao
Lutz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:35:45 -0400, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
The zAAP on zIIP support should not be construed to imply that zAAPs are
going away.
It was intended primarily for customers with small enough amounts of zAAP
and zIIP offload that it might not make sense to purchase both a
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:41:27 -0500, Hal Merritt hmerr...@jackhenry.com wrote:
But let's turn your question around. The HMC emulator works just like any
other. It expects to connect to a 'controller' via TCP/IP. The 'controller'
might be an IBM 2074, Viscera, or an OSA configured as ICC. Or at
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:28:32 -0400, Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com wrote:
You certainly can specify both a port number and a resource name for the
x3270 sessions. IIRC, the implementation is a little strange, but it can be
done, I have done it.
Thank you for the hint, Scott !
So I have to
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:28:32 -0400, Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com wrote:
You certainly can specify both a port number and a resource name for the
x3270 sessions. IIRC, the implementation is a little strange, but it can be
done, I have done it.
And just found it - using online-help :-)
Ron,
may I ask what USSTAB you mean ? A 'native' USSTAB used by VTAM for
NON-SNA or SNA-major nodes or an USSTAB offered TN3270E-emulations
by the TN3270-Server (by using a STEPLIB) ?
ciao Lutz
--
For
Thank you for underlining this, Martin !
That exactly was the reason asking Ron about VTAM- or TN3270-USSTAB usage.
ciao Lutz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:49:41 -0500, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
obrie...@mail.nih.gov wrote:
We are currently running Linux under Z/VM as well as Z/os.
Since we are more familiar with the Z/os environment, we opted to backup
our Linux volumes using FDR under Z/os. It appears that no
Radoslaw,
yes - you can use shared OSC-devices as NIP-consoles in all LPAR's.
We implemented it here this way and it works without problem.
ciao Lutz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Radoslaw,
that's the advantage of a shared OSC-channel, coding UNIT=OSC for the CU and
UNIT=3270,MODEL=X for the IODEVICE.
AFAIK normally you can't share the same address of a 3174-CU over all LPARs.
And yes, define i.e. 100 as your NIP-console and 101, 102 as MCS-consoles
(if you need 2
If you say 'single' z/OS image you mean a z/OS virt. guest (under z/VM) or a
LPAR ?
If it should be virt. guest then there is the possibility that someone logged
into the guest and let it hang around in mode 'CP READ' (some kind of virtual
STOP ...)
ciao Lutz
We use 2 HMC's here on our z9 EC. One with icon- (for migration purposes)
and the other with tree-style.
Honestly spoken: I like tree-style more and I'm sure that next year I'll
change our second HMC to it too.
ciao Lutz
Yes, it does (at least since z/VM 5.1)
ciao Lutz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Yes, Rich - I stand corrected !
Just checked IBM's appropr. IFL-URL under
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/linux/solutions/ifl.html
And there zVM V4 is mentioned ...
ciao Lutz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
In our DS8100 we defined here 65520 Cyls. (for z/OS 1.6, z/VM 5.1 and SLES9).
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
24 matches
Mail list logo
