sftp /usr/lib/ssh/sftp-server
and then we've generated the private and public keys in /etc/ssh too, using the
ssh-keygen command.
The IBM Ported Tools manuals should clarify everything for you though.
Regards
Patrick Loftus
Just found this information related to the ZFS delay I'd had, which I'd filed
away. It's copied from a redpiece. I chopped bits out here and there I think,
but the full text is in the following Redpiece:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/pdfs/sg246580.pdf
2.12.2 Mounting zFS file systems
Yeah, that could have been it. I believe it waits something like 1 minute, and
then continues.
If your ZFS shutdown wasn't clean, it may have also been checking each ZFS
filesystem, which can take a lot of time if you have a lot of ZFS filesystems.
You'd see messages on the SYSLOG for this
Do a D OMVS,L command, and check your SHRLIBRGNSIZE high water mark. You may
be able to decrease the SHRLIBRGNSIZE, to free up storage for your WASoem
server.
Regards
Patrick Loftus
Systems Programming Team Leader
Central Systems
TNT sure we can
to have an inherent cap to
the download speeds.
Regards
Patrick Loftus
Systems Programming Team Leader
Central Systems
patrick.lof...@tnt.com
TNT sure we can
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
Patrick Loftus
Systems Programming Team Leader
Central Systems
patrick.lof...@tnt.com
TNT sure we can
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM
60s*10*no.of.cps is correct no matter what the engine speed isn't it, for
CPU seconds? How much work gets done in those seconds will differ depending
on the engine speed though, e.g. a z10-604 and a z10-704 same amount of CPU
seconds, but the 704 will be processing more instructions, and if you
We use it here at TNT. Very happy with it.
When we first installed it, we cleaned out rafts of old defunct parmlib
definitions (z/OS, VTAM, JES) that Image Focus spotted.
I like receiving automated email telling me what is incorrect in parmlib
the day the mistake is made, rather than waiting to
I HIGHLY recommend setting romount_recovery=on as per the following link:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r10/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.r10.e0za100/dfsmroa.htm
Otherwise, you can end up in the situation where you're trying to recover a
system from a failure and your ZFS
Great idea - been thinking about same thing myself for a while now.
I'll add the few sites I know of.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
One thing I hate is when something/someone places a large amount of data
into a filesystem, which automatically grows. You then find that data was
placed there accidentally, or incorrectly. You're left with an over
allocated filesystem, with no way of dynamically (that I know of anyway)
We use OPS/MVS to raise all kinds of alerting - batch job failures, STCs
falling over, error messages from syslog, etc etc etc, you name it.
OPS/MVS uses OPSCAWTO and sends SNMP traps over to a server running BMC
software to raise the incidents.
We have a generic REXX which numerous rules pass
Might be worth checking with your network department to see if they've changed
anything that would stop the outbound FTP from establishing a connection.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
I think the improvements Ulrich was talking about must be the new CSSMTP
server in z/OS v1r11.
More information in the z/OS v1r11 Comms Server IP Config Guide here:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/F1A1B390/2.18.1?DT=20090330131407#HDRCSSMTP
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:35:45 -0400, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
It was intended primarily for customers with small enough amounts of zAAP
and zIIP offload that it might not make sense to purchase both a zAAP and a
zIIP.
What about the opposite? Any plans to allow zIIP on zAAP?
We've been using MSM beta version, and we're very impressed at this early stage.
As an example, it took me about 2 minutes work to get VTAPE installed (not
configured). Elapsed time longer obviously, due to downloading and SMP/E
batch work, but you can put your feet up whilst you wait, or
You could probably use the below somehow. The manuals on the CA website are
quite good, so I'd check those first.
table = 'SWZ_STCTBL'
ADDRESS SQL
SELECT NAME INTO :TASK FROM table WHERE CURRENT_STATE = 'UP'
We've been using the default of YES up to z/OS 1.8, but will now take the
default of NO for z/OS 1.9.
Shouldn't be any problem, as we will discover any issues when rolling out
through various systems. So far we've discovered a bug in our Sysprog
sysplex with a BMC DB2 utility, but they've
We seem to be experiencing noticeably less MIPS than expected on our z/OS
LPARs, and it almost looks like the speciality engines (zAAP, IFL etc) are
contributing to the multiproccesor overheads and reducing the CPU resource.
Has anyone else experienced greater multiprocessor overheads than
I'll add my result to the list too..
VendorProduct Votes
Mackinney VTAMSwitch 2
Macro4Vtubes 3
PassGoMultSess2
NC Access/NC Pass 1
IBM Supersession
Without paying additional license fees
Why have those words in the agreement? Doesn't that imply that you can pay
additional license fees and use it on a home PC?
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:12:34 +0100, Phil Payne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
means that you may not copy and use this Program on another
Not being an OS/2 aficianado, I don't have much of a reaction to the
news, but I am curious as to what IBM will run on our zBox HMC. I
would imagine some flavor of Linux. Anybody know?
IBM said No comment when asked if the new OS would be Linux, but
apparently it would be a 'closed box',
22 matches
Mail list logo
