t;
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.
Greetings Listers,
Could someone please advise if there is a way by which we may know the
exact maintenance level (say RSU or PUT level ) of the z/OS running on a
system ? I wonder if IBM has anything in place in SMP/e which could tell us
the maintenance level based on the highest level of PTF in
My great thanks to all who have responded to my query.
Raj
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.
> Peter Hunkeler writes:
>>Isn't it about time for one more name change since
>>z/OS is approaching release 10?
>
> Any nominations? :-)
> z/MVS for nostalgic reasons.
> Regards,
> John K
That sounds good and I'll vote for that.
warm regards,
Raj
I don't know if you can have the color setup for mails you receive from
IBM -main. However, you can set up a rule in your Lotus Notes to move
every email you receive from IBM-Main into a different folder.
here 's the procedure to do it :
1. Go to 'TOOLS' on your left hand side . Select 'Rules'
Hi Listers,
Don't know if anyone has already mentioned for CA- Hyperbuf. It is :
//CAHBEXCL DD DUMMY bypass CA- Hyperbuf
Thanks,
Raj
Jack Kelly wrote:
> a
>
>b
c to z .
Just completing the response so nobody has to go and do RTFM :-)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-M
Hi All,
Could someone please enlighten me on the below query ? :
Q. I have renamed a LNKLSTed load library ( say , ABC.LOAD on VOLSER =
XX ) to ABC.LOAD.OLD . I have then named a new version of the same
product load library to the same name ( ABC.LOAD.NEW on VOLSER=XX
to ABC.LOAD ;
the only option ?
OR
Is there anything else that can be done ? I tried recycling the VLF . It
did not really work . (Silly me :-) )
Raj
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rajesh Dharia
> Sent: Wednesday, Febru
Hi Mark,
Not local rules, really. I could update the LNKLST dynamically.However,
that won't be useful unless it is backed by the same changes done
statically (which will be taking effect during the next IPL ). The problem
is ... the change management procedures come into the scene here and I
f
Mark is absolutely correct on this too.
Raj
---
In the case of renaming "current to old" and "new to current" on the
same volume, I think LLA would restart without complaining. LLA just
wouldn't be managing the "new" library since the LNKLST still has the
old
to be fixed with the
report model dataset.
Can someone share his/her experience if faced/overcame such an issue?
Ragards,
Rajesh Dharia,
Mainframes Systems Programmer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
12 matches
Mail list logo
