z/OS R4 going to z/OS R6 and currently we run with 16 CP's on-line INITIAL
at IPL on our largest CEC and normally run with the max on our other machine
except for systems programming test partitions. This is of course at IPL
what happens next varies widely and often. We use IRD CPU and weight
man
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Edward E. Jaffe
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 1:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: (muliple CPCs on a box?) Does anyone know
Richards.Bob wrote:
>Not us, and I do not think
Richards.Bob wrote:
Not us, and I do not think we will ever want to get there, if we can help it
As usual, it depends. It depends on configurations and why you have them the
way you do. In our environment, we want to be highly-available. To us, that is
multiple CECs, cross-configurations, DB2
possibility of a single point of
failure. Remote, but possible.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Justice
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 12:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: (muliple CPCs on a box
How many people are running max number of processors in a LPAR?
-Rob.
at 1.4 yes we are already at max # in all prod lpars, will be on 1.6 soon,
very, very soon.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruc
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward E. Jaffe
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 4:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: (muliple CPCs on a box?) Does anyone know
R.S. wrote:
> IMHO it does make a sense.
> 1. You can share processors for s
R.S. wrote:
IMHO it does make a sense.
1. You can share processors for systems which do not support more than
x (16) CPs, or support them badly, or there are tools installed which
do not support or...
Who said anything about assigning more logical CPs than an operating
system can handle?
Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Schramm, Rob wrote:
Why isn't there an option to run multiple groups of shared CPUs on a
single box?
If I can run 54 processors on a box.. it would seem to make more sense
to run groups of shared processors and setting up lpars to share them
appropriately than trying to
Schramm, Rob wrote:
Why isn't there an option to run multiple groups of shared CPUs on a
single box?
If I can run 54 processors on a box.. it would seem to make more sense
to run groups of shared processors and setting up lpars to share them
appropriately than trying to setup 54 procs to be sh
I am sure that I assumed that IBM would get around to this... but it
doesn't seem to be happening.
Ok.. so the z990 had multiple processor books and a multiple I/O
"cages"...
And while I can run one set of "shared" processors and I can
dedicate processors to a lpar...
Why isn't there an opti
10 matches
Mail list logo
