In fkjpr71k9aqo209gi143h9g9hnuq125...@4ax.com, on 05/23/2012
at 08:54 AM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
On a logical basis I agree with you but has the 24/7/365 shortcut
for continuous availability become so pervasive that it is the
shorthand way for saying it
Shorthand? How
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In fkjpr71k9aqo209gi143h9g9hnuq125...@4ax.com, on 05/23/2012
at 08:54 AM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
On a logical basis I agree with you but has the 24/7/365 shortcut
for
zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:CAFO-8tqWyJKz+G7jJXvgooJ7QinzBAo=rw0+ywebrx8_jbv...@mail.gmail.com
...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In fkjpr71k9aqo209gi143h9g9hnuq125...@4ax.com, on 05/23/2012
at 08:54
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
zMan
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 6:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 24/7/365 appropriateness was Re: IBMLink outages in 2012
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote
On 22 May 2012 20:04:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
In hj3lr7lassfuf88ovoeg000i1pp935e...@4ax.com, on 05/21/2012
at 03:51 PM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
I'm the last to see my own errors. Hopefully it was obvious I
meant 24/7/365
That's no better. Either
In actuality, isn't 24x7 comprehensive enough?
The 24 infers that the availability is round the clock, as opposed to most
operating schedules that embrace a single day shift of 8 hours (banker's
hours), or a day of 14 or 16 hours.
The 7 infers that availability is every day of the week, as
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 24/7/365 appropriateness was Re: IBMLink outages in 2012
In actuality, isn't 24x7 comprehensive enough?
The 24 infers that the availability is round the clock, as opposed to most
operating schedules that embrace a single day shift of 8 hours (banker's
hours), or a day of 14
cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca (Clark Morris) writes:
On a logical basis I agree with you but has the 24/7/365 shortcut for
continuous availability become so pervasive that it is the shorthand
way for saying it and is it the way that the general public as opposed
to us professional nitpickers best
: bfairch...@rocketsoftware.com * w:
www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Clark Morris
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 6:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: 24/7/365 appropriateness was Re: IBMLink outages
chartreuse.
Fortunately architects and engineers know how to use mathematically
accurate and precise terminology when describing the bridges they
design and build, or we would have a lot more cars falling off of
collapsing bridges.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012g.html#29 24/7/365 appropriateness
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Bill Fairchild
bfairch...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
And the general public, many Dilbertian managers, and even some of us
professional nitpickers, think that a job running 1 hour instead of 10 is
900% faster, and that 1 is 10 times smaller than 10. 2+2 no
On Wed, 23 May 2012 14:20:03 +, Bill Fairchild wrote:
And the general public, many Dilbertian managers, and even some of us
professional nitpickers, think that a job running 1 hour instead of 10 is 900%
faster,
I believe that's correct usage, even as an airplane that flies from
New York
: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 6:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: 24/7/365 appropriateness was Re: IBMLink outages in 2012
On 22 May 2012 20:04:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Inhj3lr7lassfuf88ovoeg000i1pp935e...@4ax.com, on 05/21/2012
at 03:51 PM, Clark Morriscfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca
13 matches
Mail list logo
